Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics
- 217 Downloads
Virtual reconstruction of large cranial defects is still a challenging task. The current reconstruction procedures depend on the surgeon’s experience and skills in planning the reconstruction based on mirroring and manual adaptation. The aim of this study is to propose and evaluate a computer-based approach employing a statistical shape model (SSM) of the cranial vault.
An SSM was created based on 131 CT scans of pathologically unaffected adult crania. After segmentation, the resulting surface mesh of one patient was established as template and subsequently registered to the entire sample. Using the registered surface meshes, an SSM was generated capturing the shape variability of the cranial vault. The knowledge about this shape variation in healthy patients was used to estimate the missing parts. The accuracy of the reconstruction was evaluated by using 31 CT scans not included in the SSM. Both unilateral and bilateral bony defects were created on each skull. The reconstruction was performed using the current gold standard of mirroring the intact to the affected side, and the result was compared to the outcome of our proposed SSM-driven method. The accuracy of the reconstruction was determined by calculating the distances to the corresponding parts on the intact skull.
While unilateral defects could be reconstructed with both methods, the reconstruction of bilateral defects was, for obvious reasons, only possible employing the SSM-based method. Comparing all groups, the analysis shows a significantly higher precision of the SSM group, with a mean error of 0.47 mm compared to the mirroring group which exhibited a mean error of 1.13 mm. Reconstructions of bilateral defects yielded only slightly higher estimation errors than those of unilateral defects.
The presented computer-based approach using SSM is a precise and simple tool in the field of computer-assisted surgery. It helps to reconstruct large-size defects of the skull considering the natural asymmetry of the cranium and is not limited to unilateral defects.
KeywordsStatistical shape model (SSM) Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) Virtual defect reconstruction 3D planning
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 3.Unterhofer C, Wipplinger C, Verius M, Recheis W, Thome C, Ortler M (2017) Reconstruction of large cranial defects with poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) using a rapid prototyping model and a new technique for intraoperative implant modeling. Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska 51(3):214–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Lamecker H (2008) Variational and statistical shape modeling for 3D geometry reconstruction. Freie Universität Berlin, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 13.Tarsitano A, Ciocca L, Cipriani R, Scotti R, Marchetti C (2015) Mandibular reconstruction using fibula free flap harvested using a customised cutting guide: how we do it. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Italica 35(3):198Google Scholar
- 15.Scolozzi P, Terzic A (2011) Mirroring computational planning, navigation guidance system, and intraoperative mobile C-arm cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detector: A new rationale in primary and secondary treatment of midfacial fractures? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69(6):1697–1707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Wien W (2012) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 23.Wu T, Engelhardt M, Fieten L, Popovic A, Radermacher K (2006) Anatomically constrained deformation for design of cranial implant: methodology and validation. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2006, pp 9–16Google Scholar
- 25.Zachow S, Kubiack K, Malinowski J, Lamecker H, Essig H, Gellrich N (2010) Modellgestützte chirurgische Rekonstruktion komplexer Mittelgesichtsfrakturen. In: Proceedings of the BMT biomed tech, Rostock, 2010. vol (Suppl. 01), pp 107–108Google Scholar
- 27.Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J-C, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imag 30(9):1323–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Avants BB, Tustison N, Song G (2009) Advanced normalization tools (ANTS). Insight J 2:1–35Google Scholar
- 30.Goodall C (1991) Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological) 5(2):285–339Google Scholar
- 31.Schlager S (2015) RvtkStatismo: Integrating statismo and R using the vtkStandardMeshRepresenter. https://github.com/zarquon42b/RvtkStatismo. Accessed 2015
- 32.Lüthi M, Blanc R, Albrecht T, Gass T, Goksel O, Büchler P, Kistler M, Bousleiman H, Reyes M, Cattin P (2012) Statismo-a framework for PCA based statistical models. Insight J 1:1–18Google Scholar
- 44.Metzger M, Bittermann G, Dannenberg L, Schmelzeisen R, Gellrich N-C, Hohlweg-Majert B, Scheifele C (2013) Design and development of a virtual anatomic atlas of the human skull for automatic segmentation in computer-assisted surgery, preoperative planning, and navigation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8(5):691–702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Besson A, Leger J, Doual A (2000) A study of craniofacial asymmetry using computed tomography. Bulletin du Groupement international pour la recherche scientifique en stomatologie & odontologie 43(2):68–73Google Scholar