Shape-based acetabular cartilage segmentation: application to CT and MRI datasets
- 383 Downloads
A new method for acetabular cartilage segmentation in both computed tomography (CT) arthrography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets with leg tension is developed and tested.
The new segmentation method is based on the combination of shape and intensity information. Shape information is acquired according to the predictable nonlinear relationship between the U-shaped acetabulum region and acetabular cartilage. Intensity information is obtained from the acetabular cartilage region automatically to complete the segmentation procedures. This method is evaluated using 54 CT arthrography datasets with two different radiation doses and 20 MRI datasets. Additionally, the performance of this method in identifying acetabular cartilage is compared with four other acetabular cartilage segmentation methods.
This method performed better than the comparison methods. Indeed, this method maintained good accuracy level for 74 datasets independent of the cartilage modality and with minimum user interaction in the bone segmentation procedures. In addition, this method was efficient in noisy conditions and in detection of the damaged cartilages with zero thickness, which confirmed its potential clinical usefulness.
Our new method proposes acetabular cartilage segmentation in three different datasets based on the combination of the shape and intensity information. This method executes well in situations where there are clear boundaries between the acetabular and femoral cartilages. However, the acetabular cartilage and pelvic bone information should be obtained from one dataset such as CT arthrography or MRI datasets with leg traction.
KeywordsAcetabular cartilage CT arthrography Graph-Cut K-OPLS MRI Pelvic bone
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
For this type of study, formal consent is not required because this study is a retrospective study.
Written informed consent was not required for this study because this study is a retrospective study.
- 4.Williams TG, Holmes AP, Waterton JC, Maciewicz RA, Hutchinson CE, Moots RJ, Nash AFP, Taylor CJ (2010) Anatomically corresponded regional analysis of cartilage in asymptomatic and osteoarthritic knees by statistical shape modelling of the bone. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(8):1541–1559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Cheong J, Suter D, Cicuttini F (2005) Development of semi-automatic segmentation methods for measuring tibial cartilage volume. In: Proceedings of DICTA, pp 307–314Google Scholar
- 10.Glocker B, Komodakis N, Paragios N, Glaser C, Tziritas G, Navab N (2007) Primal/dual linear programming and statistical atlases for cartilage segmentation. Proc MICCAI 10:536–543Google Scholar
- 15.Khanmohammadi M, Zoroofi RA, Nishii T, Tanaka H, Sato Y (2009) A hybrid technique for thickness-map visualization of the hip cartilages in MRI. IEICE Trans Inf Syst E92-D(11):2253–2263Google Scholar
- 16.Du X, Velut J, Bolbos R, Beuf O, Odet C, Benoit-Cattin H (2008) 3-D knee cartilage segmentation using a smoothing b-spline active surface. In: Proceedings of ICIP, pp 2924–2927Google Scholar
- 17.Ali-Shah SA, Yahya K, Mubashar G, Bais A (2010) Quantification and visualization of MRI cartilage of the knee: a simplified approach. In: Proceedings of ICET, pp 175–180Google Scholar
- 19.Bylesjo M, Rantalainen M, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Trygg J (2008) K-OPLS package: kernel-based orthogonal projections to latent structures for prediction and interpretation in feature space. BMC Bioinform 9(106):1–7Google Scholar
- 22.Yokota F, Okada T, Takao M, Sugano N, Tada Y, Sato Y (2009) Automated segmentation of the femur and pelvis from 3D CT data of diseased hip using hierarchical statistical shape model of joint structure. Proc MICCAI 12:811–818Google Scholar
- 23.National Library of Medicine Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit. http://www.itk.org
- 25.Carr JC, Beatson RK, Cherrie JB, Mitchell TJ, Fright WR, McCallum BC, Evans TR (2001) Reconstruction and representation of 3D objects with radial basis functions. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, pp 67–76Google Scholar
- 26.Zhang N, Zhang J, Shi R (2008) An improved Chan-Vese model for medical image segmentation. Proc Comput Sci Softw Eng 1:864–867Google Scholar
- 27.Heimann T, van Ginneken B, Styner MA, Arzhaeva Y, Aurich V, Bauer C, Beck A, Becker C, Beichel R, Bekes G, Bello F, Binnig G, Bischof H, Bornik A, Cashman PM, Chi Y, Cordova A, Dawant BM, Fidrich M, Furst JD, Furukawa D, Grenacher L, Hornegger J, Kainmüller D, Kitney RI, Kobatake H, Lamecker H, Lange T, Lee J, Lennon B, Li R, Li S, Meinzer HP, Nemeth G, Raicu DS, Rau AM, van Rikxoort EM, Rousson M, Rusko L, Saddi KA, Schmidt G, Seghers D, Shimizu A, Slagmolen P, Sorantin E, Soza G, Susomboon R, Waite JM, Wimmer A, Wolf I (2009) Comparison and evaluation of methods for liver segmentation from CT datasets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(8):1251–1265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar