Adaptive noise correction of dual-energy computed tomography images
- 195 Downloads
Noise reduction in material density images is a necessary preprocessing step for the correct interpretation of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) images. In this paper we describe a new method based on a local adaptive processing to reduce noise in DECT images
An adaptive neighborhood Wiener (ANW) filter was implemented and customized to use local characteristics of material density images. The ANW filter employs a three-level wavelet approach, combined with the application of an anisotropic diffusion filter. Material density images and virtual monochromatic images are noise corrected with two resulting noise maps.
The algorithm was applied and quantitatively evaluated in a set of 36 images. From that set of images, three are shown here, and nine more are shown in the online supplementary material. Processed images had higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) than the raw material density images. The average improvements in SNR and CNR for the material density images were 56.5 and 54.75 %, respectively.
We developed a new DECT noise reduction algorithm. We demonstrate throughout a series of quantitative analyses that the algorithm improves the quality of material density images and virtual monochromatic images.
KeywordsMaterial density Dual-energy computed tomography Noise reduction Adaptive Wiener filter
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
Rafael Simon Maia, Christian Jacob, Amy K. Hara, Alvin C. Silva, William Pavlicek and J.Ross Mitchell declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Balda M, Heismann B, Hornegger J (2010) Value-based noise reduction for low-dose dual-energy computed tomography. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 3.Grant KL, Flohr TG, Krauss B, Sedlmair M (2014) Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media. Investig Radiol 49(9):586–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Hinshaw DA, Dobbins JT III (1995) Recent progress in noise reduction and scatter correction in dual-energy imaging. In: Van Metter RL, Beutel J (eds) Medical imaging. SPIE, Washington, pp 134–142Google Scholar
- 7.Li B, Li B, Luo J, Tang P, Mao J, Wu X (2013) Simultaneous reduction in noise and cross-contamination artifacts for dual-energy X-ray CT. BioMed Res Int 2013(6):1–8Google Scholar
- 10.Park KK, Oh CH, Akay M (2011) Image enhancement by spectral-error correction for dual-energy computed tomography. In: 2011 33rd annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE, pp 8491–8494Google Scholar
- 11.Park KK, Pavlicek W, Boltz T, Paden R, Hara A, Akay M (2009) Image-based dual energy CT improvements using Gram–Schmidt method. In: Samei E, Hsieh J (eds) SPIE medical imaging. SPIE, Washington, pp 72583S–72583S-9Google Scholar
- 12.Prewitt JM (1970) Object enhancement and extraction. chap. In: Lipkin BS, Rosenfeld A (eds) Picture processing and psychopictorics. Academic Press, New York, pp 75–149Google Scholar