An algorithm for noise correction of dual-energy computed tomography material density images
- 303 Downloads
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) images can undergo a two-material decomposition process which results in two images containing material density information. Material density images obtained by that process result in images with increased pixel noise. Noise reduction in those images is desirable in order to improve image quality.
A noise reduction algorithm for material density images was developed and tested. A three-level wavelet approach combined with the application of an anisotropic diffusion filter was used. During each level, the resulting noise maps are further processed, until the original resolution is reached and the final noise maps obtained. Our method works in image space and, therefore, can be applied to any type of material density images obtained from any DECT vendor. A quantitative evaluation of the noise-reduced images using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and 2D noise power spectrum was done to quantify the improvements.
The noise reduction algorithm was applied to a set of images resulting in images with higher SNR and CNR than the raw density images obtained by the decomposition process. The average improvement in terms of SNR gain was about 49 % while CNR gain was about 52 %. The difference between the raw and filtered regions of interest mean values was far from reaching statistical significance (minimum \(p> 0.89\), average \(p> 0.97\)).
We have demonstrated through a series of quantitative analyses that our novel noise reduction algorithm improves the image quality of DECT material density images.
KeywordsMaterial density Dual-energy computed tomography Noise reduction Anisotropic diffusion
Conflict of interest
Rafael Simon Maia, Christian Jacob, Amy K. Hara, Alvin C. Silva, William Pavlicek and J.Ross Mitchell declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
- 2.Balda M, Heismann B, Hornegger J (2010) Value-based noise reduction for low-dose dual-energy computed tomography. In: link.springer.com. Springer, Berlin, pp 547–554Google Scholar
- 4.Hinshaw DA, Dobbins JT III (1995) Recent progress in noise reduction and scatter correction in dual-energy imaging. In: Van Metter RL, Beutel J (eds) Medical imaging. SPIE, pp 134–142Google Scholar
- 5.Hsieh J (2003) Computed tomography. In: Principles, design, artifacts, and recent advances. Society of photo opticalGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hsieh J, Thibault JB et al (2010) Methods and apparatus for noise estimation for multi-resolution anisotropic diffusion filtering. US Patent 7,706,497Google Scholar
- 8.Joshi M, Langan D, Sahani D, Kambadakone A, Aluri S, Procknow K, Wu X, Bhotika R, Okerlund D, Kulkarni N, et al. (2010) Effective atomic number accuracy for kidney stone characterization using spectral CT. In: SPIE medical imaging. International society for optics and photonics, pp 76,223K–76,223KGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kalender WA (2011) Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 11.Landry G, DeBlois F, Bazalova M, Verhaegen F (2009) MO-D-303A-06: ImaSim, an animated tool for teaching imaging. Med Phys 36(6):2696–2697Google Scholar
- 17.Park KK, Oh CH, Akay M (2011) Image enhancement by spectral-error correction for dual-energy computed tomography. In: 2011 33rd Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE, pp 8491–8494Google Scholar
- 18.Park, KK, Pavlicek W, Boltz T, Paden R, Hara A, Akay M (2009) Image-based dual energy CT improvements using Gram–Schmidt method. In: Samei E, Hsieh J (eds) SPIE medical imaging. SPIE, pp 72,583S–72,583S-9Google Scholar
- 20.Petersilka M, Krauss B, Stierstorfer K (2011) Noise reduction in dual-source ct scanning. In: SPIE medical imaging. International society for optics and photonics, pp 79,613Q–79,613QGoogle Scholar
- 21.Prewitt JM (1970) Picture processing and psychopictorics, chap. Object enhancement and extraction. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
- 22.Qiang Y (2011) Image denoising based on Haar wavelet transform. In: Electronics and optoelectronics (ICEOE)Google Scholar
- 23.Johnson TRC, Fink C, Schönberg SO, Reiser MF (eds) (2011) Dual energy CT in clinical practice, vol 201, no 1. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 25.Tsiotsios C, Petrou M (2013) On the choice of the parameters for anisotropic diffusion in image processing. Pattern Recognit 46(5):1369–1381Google Scholar
- 27.Watanabe Y (1999) Derivation of linear attenuation coefficients from ct numbers for low-energy photons. Phys Med Biol 44(9):2201Google Scholar
- 28.Wu X, Langan DA, Xu D, Benson TM et al (2009) Monochromatic CT image representation via fast switching dual kVp. Proc SPIE 7258(725):845Google Scholar
- 29.Xu D, Langan DA, Wu X, Pack JD (2010) Method and system for correlated noise suppression in dual energy imaging. US Patent OfficeGoogle Scholar
- 30.Zbijewski W, Gang G, Wang A, Stayman J, Taguchi K, Carrino J, Siewerdsen J (2013) Noise reduction in material decomposition for low-dose dual-energy cone-beam CT In: SPIE medical imaging. International society for optics and photonics, pp 866,819–866,819Google Scholar