Capturing large shape variations of liver using population-based statistical shape models
- 252 Downloads
Statistical shape models (SSMs) represent morphological variations of a specific object. When there are large shape variations, the shape parameters constitute a large space that may include incorrect parameters. The human liver is a non-rigid organ subject to large deformations due to external forces or body position changes during scanning procedures. We developed and tested a population-based model to represent the shape of liver.
Upper abdominal CT-scan input images are represented by a conventional shape model. The shape parameters of individual livers extracted from the CT scans are employed to classify them into different populations. Corresponding to each population, an SSM model is built. The liver surface parameter space is divided into several subspaces which are more compact than the original space. The proposed model was tested using 29 CT-scan liver image data sets. The method was evaluated by model compactness, reconstruction error, generality and specificity measures.
The proposed model is implemented and tested using CT scans that included liver shapes with large shape variations. The method was compared with conventional and recently developed shape modeling methods. The accuracy of the proposed model was nearly twice that achieved with the conventional model. The proposed population-based model was more general compared with the conventional model. The mean reconstruction error of the proposed model was 0.029 mm while that of the conventional model was 0.052 mm.
A population-based model to represent the shape of liver was developed and tested with favorable results. Using this approach, the liver shapes from CT scans were modeled by a more compact, more general, and more accurate model.
KeywordsStatistical shape model Population-based shape model Shape representation Medical image analysis
Conflict of interest
Amir H. Foruzan, Yen-Wei Chen, Masatoshi Hori, Yoshinobu Sato and Noriyuki Tomiyama declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Heimann T, Meinzer HP (2009) Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: a review. Med Image Anal 13(4):543–563Google Scholar
- 3.Pepe, A, Zhao L, Koikkalainen J, Hietala J, Ruotsalainen U, Tohka J (2013) Automatic statistical shape analysis of cerebral asymmetry in 3D T1-weighted magnetic resonance images at vertex-level: application to neuroleptic-naïve schizophrenia. Magn Reson Imaging 31(5):676–687. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.10.021
- 6.Chen YW, Luo J, Dong C, Han X, Tateyama T, Furukawa A, Kanasaki S (2013) Computer-aided diagnosis and quantification of cirrhotic livers based on morphological analysis and machine learning. Comput Math Methods Med 2013:264809. doi: 10.1155/2013/264809
- 8.Lamecker H, Lange T, Seebass M (2002) A statistical shape model for the liver. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2002. Springer, Berlin, pp 421–427Google Scholar
- 9.Okada T, Linguraru MG, Yoshida Y, Hori M, Summers RM, Chen Y.-W, Tomiyama N, Sato Y (2012) Abdominal multi-organ segmentation of CT images based on hierarchical spatial modeling of organ interrelations. In: Abdominal imaging, computational and clinical applications. Springer, Berlin pp 173–180 Google Scholar
- 12.Zhang W, Yan P, Li X (2011) Estimating patient-specific shape prior for medical image segmentation. In: Biomedical imaging: from nano to macro, 2011 IEEE international symposium on. IEEE 2011, pp 1451–1454Google Scholar
- 16.Goodall C (1991) Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol), 285–339Google Scholar
- 18.Styner MA, Rajamani KT, Nolte L.-P, Zsemlye G, Székely G, Taylor CJ, Davies RH (2003) Evaluation of 3D correspondence methods for model building. In: Information processing in medical imaging. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–75Google Scholar
- 19.Lorensen WE, Cline HE (1987) Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. In: ACM Siggraph computer graphics, vol 21, no 4. ACM, pp 163–169Google Scholar
- 20.Heimann T, Oguz I, Wolf I, Styner M, Meinzer H.-P (2006) Implementing the automatic generation of 3d statistical shape models with ITK. In: Open science workshop at MICCAI, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- 21.Insight toolkit. http://www.itk.org. Accessed on 6 July 2011 (2013)
- 22.Visualization toolkit. http://www.vtk.org, Accessed on 6 July 2011 (2013)
- 23.3D Slicer Software. http://www.slicer.org, Accessed on 6 July 2011 (2013)
- 24.Heitz G, Rohlfing T, Maurer Jr CR (2005) Statistical shape model generation using nonrigid deformation of a template mesh. In: Medical imaging. International society for optics and photonics, pp 1411–1421Google Scholar
- 25.Su Z, Lambrou T, Todd-Pokropek A (2006) A minimum entropy approach for automatic statistical model building. In: (Proceedings) IEEE 5th international special topic conference on information technology in biomedicineGoogle Scholar