3D variational brain tumor segmentation using Dirichlet priors on a clustered feature set
- 486 Downloads
Brain tumor segmentation is a required step before any radiation treatment or surgery. When performed manually, segmentation is time consuming and prone to human errors. Therefore, there have been significant efforts to automate the process. But, automatic tumor segmentation from MRI data is a particularly challenging task. Tumors have a large diversity in shape and appearance with intensities overlapping the normal brain tissues. In addition, an expanding tumor can also deflect and deform nearby tissue. In our work, we propose an automatic brain tumor segmentation method that addresses these last two difficult problems.
We use the available MRI modalities (T1, T1c, T2) and their texture characteristics to construct a multidimensional feature set. Then, we extract clusters which provide a compact representation of the essential information in these features. The main idea in this work is to incorporate these clustered features into the 3D variational segmentation framework. In contrast to previous variational approaches, we propose a segmentation method that evolves the contour in a supervised fashion. The segmentation boundary is driven by the learned region statistics in the cluster space. We incorporate prior knowledge about the normal brain tissue appearance during the estimation of these region statistics. In particular, we use a Dirichlet prior that discourages the clusters from the normal brain region to be in the tumor region. This leads to a better disambiguation of the tumor from brain tissue.
We evaluated the performance of our automatic segmentation method on 15 real MRI scans of brain tumor patients, with tumors that are inhomogeneous in appearance, small in size and in proximity to the major structures in the brain. Validation with the expert segmentation labels yielded encouraging results: Jaccard (58%), Precision (81%), Recall (67%), Hausdorff distance (24 mm).
Using priors on the brain/tumor appearance, our proposed automatic 3D variational segmentation method was able to better disambiguate the tumor from the surrounding tissue.
KeywordsMRI segmentation Variational methods Clustering methods Tumors Edema
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Batista J, Kitney R (1995) Extraction of tumors from MR images of the brain by texture and clustering. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on image analysis and processing (ICIAP ’95). Springer, London, pp 235–240Google Scholar
- 3.Capelle AS, Alata O, Fernandez-Maloigne C, Ferrié JC (2000) Unsupervised segmentation for automatic detection of brain tumors in MRI. In: IEEE international conference on image processing, ICIP 2000, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cobzas D, Birkbeck N, Schmidt M, Jagersand M, Murtha A (2007) 3d variational brain tumor segmentation using a high dimensional feature set. In: IEEE 11th international conference on computer vision, pp 1–8Google Scholar
- 9.Droske M, Bernhard M, Martin R, Carlo S (2001) An adaptive level set method for medical image segmentation. In: IPMI ’01: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on information processing in medical imaging, Springer, London, pp 416–422Google Scholar
- 12.Kaus M, Warfield S, Nabavi A, Black P, Jolesz F, Kikinis R (1999) Adaptive template moderated brain tumor segmentation in MRI. Bildverarbeitung fur die Medizin. Springer, Berlin, pp 102–106Google Scholar
- 13.Kaus M, Warfield S, Nabavi A, Simon K, Chatzidakis E, Black P, Jolesz F, Kikinis R (1999) Segmentation of meningiomas and low grade gliomas in MRI. In: MICCAI ’99: Proceedings of the second international conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, Springer, London, pp 1–10Google Scholar
- 14.Khotanlou H, Atif J, Colliot O, Bloch I (2006) 3D brain tumor segmentation using fuzzy classification and deformable models. Fuzzy logic and applications. Springer, New York, pp 312–318Google Scholar
- 15.Koller D, Friedman N (2005) Structured probabilistic models, (unpublished manuscript)Google Scholar
- 18.Liu J, Chelberg D, Smith C, Chebrolu H (2007) Distribution-based level set segmentation for medical images. In: 18th British machine vision conference (BMVC’07). Warwick, UK, 10–13 Sept, 2007Google Scholar
- 19.Macqueen JB (1967) Some methods of classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematics, statistics and probability, pp 281–297Google Scholar
- 22.Popuri K, Cobzas D, Jagersand M, Shah S, Murtha A (2009) 3D variational brain tumor segmentation on a clustered feature set. In: Society of photo-optical instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) conference seriesGoogle Scholar
- 24.Roth S, Black M (2005) Fields of experts: a framework for learning image priors. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, IEEE Computer Society, 1999, vol 2, p 860Google Scholar
- 25.Rousson M, Deriche R (2002) A variational framework for active and adaptative segmentation of vector valued images. In: IEEE workshop on motion and video comp, pp 56–61Google Scholar
- 26.Rousson M, Brox T, Deriche R (2003) Active unsupervised texture segmentation on a diffusion based feature space. In: Computer vision and pattern recognition, 2003. Proceedings. 2003 IEEE computer society conference on, vol 2, pp 699–704Google Scholar
- 27.Schmidt M, Levner I, Greiner R, Murtha A, Bistritz A (2005) Segmenting brain tumors using alignment-based features. In: Proceedings fourth international conference on machine learning and applications, 2005. pp 215–220Google Scholar
- 28.Sean H, Elizabeth B, Guido G (2002) Level set evolution with region competition: automatic 3-d segmentation of brain tumors. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on pattern recognition. IEEE Computer Society, pp 532–535Google Scholar
- 33.Varma M, Zisserman A (2005) A statistical approach to texture classification from single images. Int J Comput Vis V62(1): 61–81Google Scholar
- 34.Velthuizen R (1995) Validity guided clustering for brain tumor segmentation [treatment planning]. In: IEEE 17th annual conference engineering in medicine and biology society, 1995, vol 1, pp 413–414Google Scholar
- 37.Yazdan-Shahmorad A, Jahanian H, Patel S, Soltanian-Zadeh H (2007) Automatic brain tumor segmentation using tissue diffisivity characteristics. In: ISBI 2007 4th IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging from nano to macro, 2007, pp 780–783Google Scholar
- 38.Zhang J, Ma K, Er M, Chong V (2004) Tumor segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging by learning via one-class support vector machine. In: International workshop on advanced image technology, pp 207–211Google Scholar
- 39.Zuiderveld K (1994) Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization. In: Graphics gems IV, Academic Press, Waltham, pp 474–485Google Scholar