Immobilization and catheter guidance for breast brachytherapy

  • A. Pompeu-Robinson
  • M. Kunz
  • C. B. Falkson
  • L. J. Schreiner
  • C. P. Joshi
  • G. Fichtinger
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Brachytherapy is an important mode of breast cancer treatment; however, improvements in both treatment planning and delivery are needed. In order to meet these specific needs, integration of pre-operative imaging, supplemented by computerized surgical planning and mathematical optimization were used to develop and test an intra-operative immobilization and catheter guidance system.

Method

A custom template specific to each patient with optimally placed guide holes for catheter insertion was designed and fabricated. Creation of the template is based on a virtual reality reconstruction of the patient’s anatomy from computed tomography imaging. The template fits on the patient’s breast, immobilizing the soft tissue, and provides pre-planned catheter insertion holes for guidance to the tumor site. Agar-based phantom and target models were used for quantitative validation of the template by ascertaining the precision and accuracy of the templates.

Results

Tests were performed on agar-based tissue models using computed tomography imaging for template planning and validation. Planned catheter tracks were compared to post-insertion image data and distance measurements from target location were used to create an error measure. Initial results yielded an average error of 4.5mm. Once the workflow and template design were improved, an average error of 2.6mm was observed, bringing the error close to a clinically acceptable range.

Conclusion

Use of a patient-specific template for breast brachytherapy is feasible and may improve the procedure accuracy and outcome.

Keywords

Breast cancer Brachytherapy Radiotherapy Immobilization Guidance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tice JA (2008) “Brachytherapy as primary radiation following breast-conserving surgery for stage i or ii breast cancer”. Tech Rep. California Technology Assessment ForumGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wong R, Ngan RKC, Tang F (2005) Wide-volume partial breast interstitial brachytherapy alone after lumpectomy in breast-conserving treatment for early breast cancer. J HK Coll Radiology 8: 256–260Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Devlin, PM (eds) (2007) Brachytherapy Applications and Techniques, ch Breast Brachytherapy. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verhey LJ (1995) Immobilizing and positioning patients for radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 5(2): 100–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mitchell J, Formenti SC, DeWyngaert JK (2010) Interfraction and intrafraction setup variability for prone breast radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biology Phys 76(5): 1571–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKinnon R, Christie D, Peres H, Burke M, Le T, Lah M (2009) The prone technique for breast irradiation—is it ready for clinical trials?. The Breast 18(1): 30–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kudchadker R, Ha C, Stokes C, Kirsner S, Wilder R (2006) “2834: Breast dose reduction in women undergoing mediastinal radiotherapy using a custom prone immobilization device”. Int J Radiat Oncol 66(3, Supplement 1), S679–S679. Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the American society for therapeutic radiology and oncology, 48th annual meeting of the American society for therapeutic radiology and oncologyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP (2006) Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444: 184–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kunz M, Rudan JF, Xenoyannis GL, Ellis RE (2010) Computer-assisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates. J of Arthroplast 25(4): 600–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Owen BD, Christensen GE, Reinhardt JM, Ryken TC (2007) Rapid prototype patient-specific drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Comput Aided Surg 12(5): 303–308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ, Xie L, Guo H, Li DP (2009) A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for placement of C2 laminar screws. Eur Spine J 18: 379–1385Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M et al (1998) Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354: 28–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berry E, Cuppone M, Porada S et al (2005) Personalised image-based templates for intra-operative guidance. Proc Inst Mech Eng 219: 111–118Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lombardi A, Berend K, Adams J (2008) Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 31(9): 927–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rajon DA, Bova FJ, Chi YY, Friedman WA (2009) Rapid fabrication of custom patient biopsy guides. J Appl Clin Med Phys 10(4): 2897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Pompeu-Robinson
    • 1
  • M. Kunz
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. B. Falkson
    • 3
    • 4
  • L. J. Schreiner
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • C. P. Joshi
    • 4
    • 5
  • G. Fichtinger
    • 1
  1. 1.School of ComputingQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  3. 3.Departments of OncologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  4. 4.Cancer Center of Southeastern Ontario (CCSEO)Kingston General HospitalKingstonCanada
  5. 5.Medical PhysicsQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations