Automatic breast parenchymal density classification integrated into a CADe system
- 150 Downloads
Breast parenchymal density is an important risk factor for breast cancer. It is known that mammogram interpretation is more difficult where dense tissue is involved. Therefore, automated breast density classification may aid in breast lesion detection and analysis.
Several image pattern classification techniques for screen-film (SFM) mammography datasets were tested and classified according to BIRADS categories using known cases. A hierarchical classification procedure based on k-NN, SVM and LBN combined with principal component analysis on texture features uses the breast density features. The classification techniques have been incorporated into a CADe system to drive the detection algorithms.
The results obtained on 322 mammograms demonstrate that up to 84% of samples were correctly classified. The results of the lesion detection algorithms were obtained from modules integrated within the CADe system developed by the authors.
The ability to detect suspicious lesions on dense and heterogeneous tissue has been tested. The tools enhance the detectability of lesions and they are able to distinguish their local attenuation without local tissue density constraints.
KeywordsBreast tissue classification CADe system Texture analysis Lesion detection
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bueno G (2008) In: Fuzzy systems and deformable models. Series in medical physics and biomedical engineering. Taylor and Francis group, London, pp 305–329 (Intelligent and Adaptive Systems in Medicine)Google Scholar
- 4.Brem R, Hoffmeister J, Rapelyea J et al (2005) Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 184: 439–444Google Scholar
- 9.Gorgel P, Sertbas A, Kilic N, Ucan O, Osman O (2009) Mammographic mass classification using wavelet based support vector machine. J Electr Electron Eng 9(1): 867–875Google Scholar
- 14.American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system atlas (BIRADS). ACR, Reston, VaGoogle Scholar
- 15.Bovis K, Singh S (2002) Classification of mammographic breast density using a combined classifier paradigm. In: 4th international workshop on digital mammography, pp 177–180Google Scholar
- 16.Bosch A, Munoz X, Oliver A, Marti J (2006) Modeling and classifying breast tissue density in mammograms. In: Proceedings IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 21, pp 1552–1558Google Scholar
- 17.Oliver A, Lladó X, Martí R, Freixenet J, Zwiggelaar R (2007) Classifying mammograms using texture information. In: Proceedings medical image understanding and analysis, pp 223–227Google Scholar
- 20.Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2001) Pattern Classification. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 21.Bueno G, Ruiz M, Sánchez S (2006) B-spline filtering for automatic detection of calcification lesions in mammograms. In: Proceedings of the Intern. conference on information optics, WIO’06. pp 60–70Google Scholar
- 22.Petroudi S, Kadir T, Brady M (2003) Automatic classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns: a statistical approach. In: Proceedings IEEE conference engineering medicine Biology Society vol 1, pp 798–801Google Scholar