Indexing and retrieving DICOM data in disperse and unstructured archives

  • Carlos Costa
  • Filipe Freitas
  • Marco Pereira
  • Augusto Silva
  • José L. Oliveira
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

This paper proposes an indexing and retrieval solution to gather information from distributed DICOM documents by allowing searches and access to the virtual data repository using a Google-like process.

Methods and materials

The medical imaging modalities are becoming more powerful and less expensive. The result is the proliferation of equipment acquisition by imaging centers, including the small ones. With this dispersion of data, it is not easy to take advantage of all the information that can be retrieved from these studies. Furthermore, many of these small centers do not have large enough requirements to justify the acquisition of a traditional PACS.

Results

A peer-to-peer PACS platform to index and query DICOM files over a set of distributed repositories that are logically viewed as a single federated unit. The solution is based on a public domain document-indexing engine and extends traditional PACS query and retrieval mechanisms.

Conclusion

This proposal deals well with complex searching requirements, from a single desktop environment to distributed scenarios. The solution performance and robustness were demonstrated in trials. The characteristics of presented PACS platform make it particularly important for small institutions, including educational and research groups.

Keywords

PACS DICOM Information retrieving Search engine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Costa C, Silva A (2007) Oliveira JL Current perspectives on PACS and cardiology case study. In: Vaidya S, Jain LC, (eds) Studies in computational intelligence: advanced computational intelligence paradigms in healthcare, chap 5. Springer, Berlin, pp 79–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang HK (2004) PACS and imaging informatics: basic principles and applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oosterwijk H (2005) Dicom basics, 3rd edn. OTech, AubreyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DICOM-P4 (2007) Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), Part 4: Service Class Specifications. National Electrical Manufacturers AssociationGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DICOM-P18 (2004) Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), Part 18: Web Access to DICOM Persistent Objects (WADO). National Electrical Manufacturers AssociationGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reiner BI et al (2005) Multi-institutional analysis of computed and direct radiography—Part II. Economic analysis. Radiology 236: 420–426. doi:10.1148/radiol.2362040673 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bradley WG (2004) Offshore teleradiology. J Am Coll Radiol 1(4): 4. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2003.12.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Larson PA, Janower ML (2005) The Nighthawk: Bird of Paradise or Albatross?. J Am Coll Radiol 2(12): 3. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2005.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Millard WB (2007) Nighthawks across a flat world: Emergency radiology in the era of globalization. Ann Emerg Med 50(5): 545–549. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silva A et al (1998) A cardiology oriented PACS. In: Proceedings of SPIE: Medical Imaging, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Costa C et al (2004) Himage PACS: a new approach to storage, integration and distribution of cardiologic images. In: PACS and Imaging Informatics—Proceedings of SPIE, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Costa C et al (2007) Enhanced PACS to support demanding telemedicine and telework scenarios. In: CARS 2007—International Congress and Exibition: Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol 2, pp S322–S323Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    DICOM-P3 (2001) Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), Part 3: Information Object Definitions. National Electrical Manufacturers AssociationGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Apache SF (2007) Lucene Index Server. http://lucene.apache.org
  15. 15.
    Gospodnetic O, Hatcher E (2004) Lucene in Action. HanningGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kalpathy-Cramer J, Hersh W (2007) Automatic image modality based classification and annotation to improve medical image retrieval. Medinfo 12(Pt 2): 1334–1338Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hersh W, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Jensen J (2007) Medical Image Retrieval and Automated Annotation: OHSU at ImageCLEF 2006, in Lecture Notes In Computer Science. Springer, Berlin pp–669Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jones KS (1988) A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. J Doc 28: 11–21. doi:10.1108/eb026526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    dcm4che. Sourceforge project (2007) http://sourceforge.net/projects/dcm4che/
  20. 20.
    Warnock MJ et al (2007) Benefits of Using the DCM4CHE DICOM Archive. J Digital Imaging 20(Suppl 1): 125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Costa CMA et al (2006) A demanding web-based PACS supported by web services technology. In: Cleary KR, Galloway RL Jr (eds) Medical Imaging 2006: Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display. Proc SPIE 6145:84–92Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Costa
    • 1
  • Filipe Freitas
    • 1
  • Marco Pereira
    • 1
  • Augusto Silva
    • 1
  • José L. Oliveira
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Aveiro, DETI/IEETAAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations