Reconstruction of 4D deformed CT for moving anatomy

Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a 4DCT reconstruction technique that improves time resolution when the anatomy moves with respiration.

Method

A cone-beam CT (CBCT) scan is performed and a breathing signal is acquired. At the same time a set of simulated CBCT projections is created from a prior source CT deformed by a time-dependent parametric deformation model. The model parameters are iteratively adjusted until the simulated projections optimally resemble the acquired images. This concept was tested with three different simulated deformation scenarios approximating a moving lung tumor with rigid and elastic deformation and a 3D anatomical expansion/contraction.

Results

The known deformation was accurately reconstructed in all three scenarios. The method is reasonably robust to noise and contrast mismatch in the projections

Conclusion

Matching simulated to actual CBCT projections can adequately constrain a 4D model of breathing-induced motion that occurs during acquisition of the CBCT data.

Keywords

4DCT Iterative CT reconstruction Deformable image registration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ford EC, Mageras GS, Yorke E, Ling CC (2003) Respiration-correlated spiral CT: a method of measuring respiratory-induced anatomic motion for radiation treatment planning. Med Phys 30(1): 88–97. doi:10.1118/1.1531177 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keall PJ, Starkschall G, Shukla H et al (2004) Acquiring 4D thoracic CT scans using a multisplice helical method. Phys Med Biol 49(10): 2053–2067. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/49/10/015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mageras GS, Pevsner A, Yorke ED et al (2004) Measurement of lung tumor motion using respiration-correlated CT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(3): 933–941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taguchi K (2007) Temporal resolution and the evaluation of candidate algorithms for four-dimensional CT. Med Phys 30(4): 640–650. doi:10.1118/1.1561286 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Low DA, Nystrom M, Kalinin E et al (2003) A method for the reconstruction of four-dimensional synchronized CT scans acquired during free breathing. Med Phys 30(6): 1254–1263. doi:10.1118/1.1576230 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Docef A, Murphy MJ, Keall PJ, Siebers JV, Williamson JF (2005) Deformed CT reconstruction from limited projection data. International congress series, vol 1281. CARS, Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, pp 104–108Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zeng RP, Fessler JA, Balter JM (2005) Respiratory motion estimation from slowly rotating x-ray projections. Med Phys 32(4): 984–991. doi:10.1118/1.1879132 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kybic J, Unser M (2003) Fast parametric elastic image registration. IEEE Trans Image Process 12(11): 1427–1442. doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.813139 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murphy MJ, Dieterich S (2006) Comparative performance of linear and nonlinear neural networks to predict irregular breathing. Phys Med Biol 51(22): 5903–5914. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/51/22/012 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seppenwoolde Y, Shirato H, Kitamura K (2002) Precise and real-time measurement of 3D tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat, measured during radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53: 822–834. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02803-1 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moré JJ (1977) The Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory, numerical analysis. Lecture notes in mathematics, vol 630. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 105–116Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ben-Israel A, Greville T (2003) Generalized inverses: theory and applications. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiation OncologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations