Consistency of parametric registration in serial MRI studies of brain tumor progression
The consistency of parametric registration in multi-temporal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies was evaluated.
Materials and methods
Serial MRI scans of adult patients with a brain tumor (glioma) were aligned by parametric registration. The performance of low-order spatial alignment (6/9/12 degrees of freedom) of different 3D serial MR-weighted images is evaluated. A registration protocol for the alignment of all images to one reference coordinate system at baseline is presented. Registration results were evaluated for both, multimodal intra-timepoint and mono-modal multi-temporal registration. The latter case might present a challenge to automatic intensity-based registration algorithms due to ill-defined correspondences. The performance of our algorithm was assessed by testing the inverse registration consistency. Four different similarity measures were evaluated to assess consistency.
Careful visual inspection suggests that images are well aligned, but their consistency may be imperfect. Sub-voxel inconsistency within the brain was found for allsimilarity measures used for parametric multi-temporal registration. T1-weighted images were most reliable for establishing spatial correspondence between different timepoints.
The parametric registration algorithm is feasible for use in this application. The sub-voxel resolution mean displacement error of registration transformations demonstrates that the algorithm converges to an almost identical solution for forward and reverse registration.
KeywordsInverse registration consistency Parametric serial MR image registration Tumor disease progression
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Shah GD, Kesari S, Xu R et al (2006) J Neurooncol 8(1): 38–46Google Scholar
- 2.Galanis E, Buckner JC, Maurer MJ et al (2006) J Neurooncol 8(2): 145–165Google Scholar
- 8.Leow AD, Huang SC, Geng A et al (2005) Inf Process Med Imaging (IPMI 2005) LNCS 3565: 493–503Google Scholar
- 9.Cachier P, Rey D (2000) Med Image Comput Assist Interv (MICCAI 2000) LNCS 1935: 472–481Google Scholar
- 14.Modersitzki J (2004) Numerical methods for image registration. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hajnal JV, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ (2001) Medical Image Registration. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar