Advertisement

Image quality in non-gated versus gated reconstruction of tongue motion using magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison using automated image processing

  • Christopher AlveyEmail author
  • C. Orphanidou
  • J. Coleman
  • A. McIntyre
  • S. Golding
  • G. Kochanski
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The use of gated or ECG triggered MR is a well-established technique and developments in coil technology have enabled this approach to be applied to areas other than the heart. However, the image quality of gated (ECG or cine) versus non-gated or real-time has not been extensively evaluated in the mouth. We evaluate two image sequences by developing an automatic image processing technique which compares how well the image represents known anatomy.

Methods

Four subjects practised experimental poly-syllabic sentences prior to MR scanning. Using a 1.5 T MR unit, we acquired comparable gated (using an artificial trigger) and non-gated sagittal images during speech. We then used an image processing algorithm to model the image grey along lines that cross the airway. Each line involved an eight parameter non-linear equation to model of proton densities, edges, and dimensions.

Results

Gated and non-gated images show similar spatial resolution, with non-gated images being slightly sharper (10% better resolution, less than 1 pixel). However, the gated sequences generated images of substantially lower inherent noise, and substantially better discrimination between air and tissue. Additionally, the gated sequences demonstrate a very much greater temporal resolution.

Conclusion

Overall, image quality is better with gated imaging techniques, especially given their superior temporal resolution. Gated techniques are limited by the repeatability of the motions involved, and we have shown that speech to a metronome can be sufficiently repeatable to allow high-quality gated magnetic resonance imaging images. We suggest that gated sequences may be useful for evaluating other types of repetitive movement involving the joints and limb motions.

Keywords

MR imaging ECG gated Non-ECG gated Image quality Comparison Automatic processing Non-linear Image processing Optimization Markov Monte-Carlo Signal Noise Ratio Tongue Speech Phrase Utterance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baer T, Gore JC, Boyce S, Nye PW (1987) Application of MRI to the analysis of speech production. Magn Reson Imaging 5: 1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Soquet A, Lecuit V, Metens T, Demolin D (2002) Mid-sagittal cut to area function transformations: direct measurements of mid-sagittal distance and area with MRI. Speech Commun 36: 169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ozturk C, McVeigh ER (2000) Four-dimensional B-spline based motion analysis of tagged MR images: introduction and in vivo validation. Phys Med Biol 45: 1683–1702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abbott MB, Donnelly LF, Dardzinski BJ, Poe SA, Chiney BA, Amin RS (2004) Obstructive sleep apnea: MR imaging volume segmentation analysis. Radiology 232(3): 889–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donnelly LF (2005) Obstructive sleep apnea in pediatric patients: evaluation with cine MR sleep studies. Radiology 236(3): 768–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bresch E, Nielsen J, Nayak K, Narayanan S (2006) Synchronized and noise-robust audio recordings during realtime magnetic resonance scans. J Acoust Soc Am 120(4): 1791–1794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crary MA, Kotzur IM, Gauger J, Gorham M, Burton S (1996) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the study of vocal tract configuration. J Voice 10(4): 378–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Demolin D, Lecuit V, Metens T, Nazarian B, Soquet A (1998) Magnetic resonance measurements of the velum port opening. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on spoken language processing (ICSLP), Sydney, pp 425–429. http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/icslp_1998/i98_0532.html. Accessed 5 2008
  9. 9.
    Demolin D, Metens T, Soquet A (2000) Real time MRI and articulatory coordinations in vowels. In: Proceedings of the 5th seminar on speech production: models and data. Universität München, Kloster Seeon, pp 93–96Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Engwall O (2004) From non-gated MRI to 3D tongue movements.In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on spoken language processing (ICSLP 2004), Jeju Island, Korea, vol II, pp 1109–1112. http://www.speech.kth.se/ctt/publications/papers04/icslp2004_realtime.pdf Accessed 5 2008
  11. 11.
    Stone M, Davis EP, Douglas AS, NessAiver M, Gullapalli R, Levine WS, Lundberg A (2001) Modeling the motion of the internal tongue from tagged cine-MRI images. J Acoust Soc Am 109(6): 2974–2982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parthasaranthy V, Prince JL, Stone M, Murano EZ, NessAiver M (2007) Measuring tongue motion from tagged cine-MRI using harmonic phase (HARP) processing. J Acoust Soc Am 121(1): 491–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    NessAiver MS, Stone M, Parthasaranthy V, Kahana Y, Paritsky A (2006) Recording high quality speech during tagged cine-MRI studies using a fiber optic microphone. J Magn Reson Imaging 23: 92–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kane AA, Butman JA, Mullick R, Skopec M, Choyke P (2002) A new method for the study of velopharyngeal function using gated magnetic resonance imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(2): 472–481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gaige TA, Benner T, Wang R, Wedeen VJ, Gilbert RJ (2007) Three dimensional myoarchitecture of the human tongue determined in vivo by diffusion tensor imaging with tractography. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(3): 654–661PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mathiak K, Klose U, Ackermann H, Hertrich I, Kincses W-E, Grodd W (2000) Stroboscopic articulography using fast magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Lang Commun Disord 35(3): 419–425. doi: 10.1080/136828200410663 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kochanski G, Orphanidou C (2008) What marks the beat of speech?. J Acoust Soc Am 123(5): 2780–2791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Joye WA, Mandel E (2003) New features of SAOImage DS9. In: Payne HE, Jedrzejewski RI, Hook RN (eds) Astronomical data analysis software and systems XII ASP conference series, vol 295, p 489Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Semjen A, Ivry RB (2001) The coupled oscillator model of between-hand coordinations in alternate-hand tapping: a reappraisal. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 27(2): 251–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stemerman DH, Krinsky GA, Lee VS, Johnson G, Yang BM, Rofsky NM (1999) Thoracic aorta: rapid black-blood MR Imaging with half-fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement with or without electrocardiographic triggering. Radiology 213(1): 185–191PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Alvey
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Orphanidou
    • 1
  • J. Coleman
    • 1
  • A. McIntyre
    • 1
  • S. Golding
    • 1
  • G. Kochanski
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations