3D-visualization of the temporomandibular joint with focus on the articular disc based on clinical T1-, T2-, and proton density weighted MR images

  • Cornelia Kober
  • Yoshihiko Hayakawa
  • Gero Kinzinger
  • Luigi Gallo
  • Mika Otonari-Yamamoto
  • Tsukasa Sano
  • Robert Alexander Sader
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Objective

An approach of 3D-visualization of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with special focus on the articular disc based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was developed for the purpose of diagnosis support.

Materials and methods

Mandibular condyle and fossa were reconstructed as 3D-surfaces. Articular disc, retrocondylar tissue, and the lateral pterygoid muscle were visualized by means of direct volume rendering. By simultaneous visualization of both, the bony surfaces and the soft tissue, anterior disc displacement could be recognized in 3D-context. Additional superposition of the 3D-visualization with the original 2D-MRI slices allowed for a combination with conventional diagnostics. The method was tested for clinical T1-, T2-, and proton density weighted MRI data from four independent medical institutions.

Results

For all cases, the skeletal anatomy could be reproduced. Applied validation approaches showed good results. Anterior disc displacement could be clearly depicted as well as the incidence of reduction of the disc. By several experienced observers, the approach was rated as significant.

Conclusion

Although partially non-standard in the clinical routine the new method provided promising results for efficient diagnosis support. Its validity in the medical practice, namely, its impact for dislocation/deformity of the mandibular disc will be further analyzed.

Keywords

MRI Temporomandibular joint Articular disc 3D-reconstruction Visualization 

Abbreviations

TMJ

Temporomandibular

MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging

CT

Computer tomography

CBCT

Cone-beam computer tomography

PDWI

Proton density weighted images

T2WI

T2-weighted images

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gray H (1918). Anatomy of the Human Body. Lea and Febiger, New York Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Katzberg RW, Westesson PL, Tallents RH, Anderson R, Kurita K, Manzione JV and Tottermann S (1988). Temporomandibular joint: MR assessment of rotational and sideways disk displacements. Radiology 169: 741–748 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sano T, Yamamoto M and Okano T (2003). Temporomandibular joint: MR imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 12: 583–595 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Larheim TA and Westesson PL (2006). Maxillofacial imaging. Springer, Berlin Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM and Hans MG (2005). Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod 32(4): 282–293 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Landes CA, Goral WA, Sader R and Mack MG (2007). Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional sonography of the temporomandibularjoint in comparison to MRI. Eur J Radiol 61(2): 235–244 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Landes CA, Goral WA, Sader R and Mack MG (2006). 3-D sonography for diagnosis of disk dislocation of the temporomandibular jointcompared with MRI. Ultrasound Med Biol 32(5): 633–639 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sano T, Widmalm SE, Yamamoto M, Sakuma K, Araki K, Matsuda Y and Okano T (2003). Usefulness of proton density and T2-weighted vs T1-weighted MRI in diagnoses of TMJ disk status. Cranio 21: 253–258 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kinzinger GS, Roth A, Gulden N, Bucker A and Diedrich PR (2006). Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances on the condyle-fossa relationship in the temporomandibular joint: a magneticresonance imaging study (Part I). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35(5): 339–346 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kinzinger GS, Roth A, Gulden N, Bucker A and Diedrich PR (2006). Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic applianceson the disc-condyle relationship in the temporomandibular joint: a magneticresonance imaging study (Part II). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35(5): 347–356 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Musgrave MT, Westesson P-L, Tallents RH, Manzione JV and Katzberg RW (1991). Improved magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint by oblique scanning planes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 71: 525–528 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Widmalm SE, Brooks SL, Sano T, Upton LG and McKay DC (2006). Limitation of the diagnostic value of MR images for diagnosing temporomandibular joint disorders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35(5): 334–338 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chirani RA, Jacq JJ, Meriot P and Roux C (2004). Temporomandibular joint: a methodology of magnetic resonance imaging 3-D reconstruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97: 756–761 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goessi D (2004) On the relationship between functional properties and anatomical structure of the temporomandibular joint. Ph.D. Thesis, Swiss Fed Inst Tech ZurichGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krebs M, Gallo LM, Airoldi RL and Palla S (1995). A new method for three-dimensional reconstruction and animation of the temporomandibular joint. Ann Acad Med Singapore 24(1): 11–16 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kitai N, Kreiborg S, Murakami S, Bakke M, Møller E, Darvann TA and Takada K (2002). A three-dimensional method of visualizing the temporomandibular joint based on magnetic resonance imaging in a case of juvenile chronic arthritis. Int J Paediatr Dent 12(2): 109–115 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kitai N, Eriksson L, Kreiborg S, Wagner A and Takada K (2004). Three-dimensional reconstruction of TMJ MR images: a technical note and case report. Cranio 22(1): 77–81 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chu SA, Suvinen TI, Clement JG and Reade PC (2001). The effect of interocclusal appliances on temporomandibular joints as assessed by 3D reconstruction of MRI scans. Aust Dent J 46(1): 18–23 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chu SA, Skultety KJ, Suvinen TI, Clement JG and Price C (1995). Computerized three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstructions of temporomandibular joints for both a model and patients with temporomandibular pain dysfunction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 80(5): 604–611 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Price C, Connell DG, MacKay A and Tobias DL (1992). Three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetic resonance images of the temporomandibular joint by I-DEAS. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 21: 148–153 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Motoyoshi M, Sadowsky PL, Bernreuter W, Fukui M and Namura S (1999). Three-dimensional reconstruction system for imaging of the temporomandibular joint using magnetic resonance imaging. J Oral Sci 41: 5–8 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hayakawa Y, Kober C, Otonari-Yamamoto M, Otonari T, Wakoh M and Sano T (2007). An approach for three-dimensional visualization using high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36(6): 341–347 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kober C, Hayakawa Y, Kinzinger G, Yamamoto M, Sano T and Sader RA (2006). An approach for three-dimensional rendering of the mandibular disc based on high-resolution MR images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1(Suppl 1): 405–406 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kober C, Leiggener C, Boerner BI, Hayakawa Y, Kinzinger G, Sader R and Zeilhofer HF (2007). First steps in 4D-rendering of craniofacial soft tissue in the TMJ region. In: Freysinger, W, Weber, S, and Caversaccio, M (eds) Computer aided surgery around the head, pp 76–78. Pro BUSINESS, Berlin Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gallo LM (2005). Modeling of temporomandibular joint function using MRI and jaw-tracking technologies-mechanics. Cells Tissues Organs 180(1): 54–68 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mercury Computer Systems (2006) Amira : Advanced 3D visualization and volume modeling. http://www.amiravis.com
  28. 28.
    Stalling D, Westerhoff M and Hege HC (2005). Amira. A highly interactive system for visualdata analysis. In: Hansen, CD and Johnson, CR (eds) The visualization handbook, pp 749–767. Elsevier, Amsterdam Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kober C, Sader R and Zeilhofer HF (2004). 3D-reconstruction and visualization of bone mineral density of the ethmoid bone. In: Buzug, TM and Lueth, TC (eds) Perspective in image-guided surgery, pp 490–496. World Scientific, Singapore Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kinzinger G, Kober C and Diedrich P (2007). Topography and morphology of the Mandibular Condyle during fixed functional orthopedic treatment: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Orofac Orthop 68(2): 124–147 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CARS 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cornelia Kober
    • 1
  • Yoshihiko Hayakawa
    • 2
  • Gero Kinzinger
    • 3
  • Luigi Gallo
    • 4
  • Mika Otonari-Yamamoto
    • 5
  • Tsukasa Sano
    • 5
  • Robert Alexander Sader
    • 6
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Computer ScienceUniversity of Applied Science - OsnabrueckOsnabrueckGermany
  2. 2.Department of Computer SciencesKitami Institute of TechnologyKitamiJapan
  3. 3.Department of OrthodonticsRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  4. 4.Dental SchoolKFS-KAB, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  5. 5.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial RadiologyTokyo Dental CollegeChibaJapan
  6. 6.Klinik fuer Mund-, Kiefer- und Plastische GesichtschirurgieUniversity of FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations