Advertisement

Position paper on magnetic resonance imaging protocols in the musculoskeletal system (excluding the spine) by the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology

  • Alberto Bellelli
  • Enzo Silvestri
  • Antonio Barile
  • Domenico AlbanoEmail author
  • Alberto Aliprandi
  • Roberto Caudana
  • Vito Chianca
  • Francesco Di Pietto
  • Carlo Faletti
  • Eugenio Genovese
  • Andrea Giovagnoni
  • Carlo Masciocchi
  • Carmelo Messina
  • Luca Maria Sconfienza
  • Vincenzo Spina
  • Marcello Zappia
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a pivotal radiological examination in clinical practice, being widely applied for musculoskeletal examinations. In this setting, strict adherence to standardized protocol is crucial to increase diagnostic performance and minimize variability among different diagnostic centres and readers. The aim of this paper is to provide standardized technical recommendations for musculoskeletal MRI scans proposed by the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology. These recommendations are designed to give a uniform application of MRI protocols over the national territory, to increase reproducibility and improve diagnostic performance.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging Musculoskeletal Position paper Protocol 

Abbreviations

FOV

Field of view

PD

Proton density

INT

Intermediate. They are sequences with long time of repetition (TR) and intermediate time of echo (TE) halfway between PD-weighted sequences (TE = 10–20 ms) and T2-weighted sequences (TE = 80–100 ms). The advantage of these sequences is that TE is short enough to maintain optimal anatomic detail (as PD-weighted sequences) and high sensitivity to fluid (as T2-weighted sequences). As a guidance, the appropriate TE is about 40–60 ms

Notes

Acknowledgements

All authors are Members of the College of Musculoskeletal Radiology of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology. Antonio Barile and Enzo Silvestri are the president-elect and present chair of the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology, respectively. Alberto Bellelli, Roberto Caudana, Carlo Faletti, Eugenio Genovese, Carlo Masciocchi and Vincenzo Spina are past chairs of the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Institutional review board approval and informed consent for this paper were not needed.

References

  1. 1.
    Ciarrapico AM, Ugenti R, Di Minco L et al (2017) Diagnostic imaging and spending review: extreme problems call for extreme measures. Radiol Med 122:288–293.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0721-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tan S, Suraya A, Sa’don S et al (2010) Musculoskeletal MRI protocol. Biomed Imaging Interv J 6:e16.  https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.6.2.e16 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G et al (1999) Fat suppression in MR Imaging: techniques and Pitfalls. RadioGraphics 19:373–382.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.2.g99mr03373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Messina C, Banfi G, Aliprandi A et al (2016) Ultrasound guidance to perform intra-articular injection of gadolinium-based contrast material for magnetic resonance arthrography as an alternative to fluoroscopy: the time is now. Eur Radiol 26:1221–1225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3945-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sconfienza LM, Albano D, Messina C et al (2018) How, when, why in magnetic resonance arthrography: an international survey by the european society of musculoskeletal radiology (ESSR). Eur Radiol 28:2356–2368.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5208-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zappia M, Castagna A, Barile A et al (2017) Imaging of the coracoglenoid ligament: a third ligament in the rotator interval of the shoulder. Skeletal Radiol 46:1101–1111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2667-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME (2002) Special focus session. MR arthrography. Radiographics 22:1223–1246.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.22.5.g02se301223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chianca V, Albano D, Messina C et al (2017) Diffusion tensor imaging in the musculoskeletal and peripheral nerve systems: from experimental to clinical applications. Eur Radiol Exp 1:12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0018-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bencardino JT, Gyftopoulos S, Palmer WE (2013) Imaging in anterior glenohumeral instability. Radiology 269:323–337.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Genovese E, Spanò E, Castagna A et al (2013) MR-arthrography in superior instability of the shoulder: correlation with arthroscopy. Radiol Med 118:1022–1033.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0942-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zappia M, Reginelli A, Russo A et al (2013) Long head of the biceps tendon and rotator interval. Musculoskelet Surg 97:99–108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-013-0290-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Nazarian LN (2009) Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol 192:1701–1707.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barile A, Bruno F, Mariani S et al (2017) What can be seen after rotator cuff repair: a brief review of diagnostic imaging findings. Musculoskelet Surg 101:3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0455-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tirman PF, Bost FW, Steinbach LS et al (1994) MR arthrographic depiction of tears of the rotator cuff: benefit of abduction and external rotation of the arm. Radiology 192:851–856.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.192.3.8058959 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bancroft L, Pettis C, Wasyliw C, Varich L (2013) Osteochondral lesions of the elbow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 17:446–454.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1360665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nakanishi K, Masatomi T, Ochi T et al (1996) MR arthrography of elbow: evaluation of the ulnar collateral ligament of elbow. Skeletal Radiol 25:629–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dubberley JH, Faber KJ, Patterson SD et al (2005) The detection of loose bodies in the elbow: the value of MRI and CT arthrography. J Bone Jt Surg Br 87-B:684–686.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.87b5.14851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moser T, Dosch J-C, Moussaoui A, Dietemann J-L (2007) Wrist ligament tears: evaluation of MRI and combined MDCT and MR arthrography. Am J Roentgenol 188:1278–1286.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rüegger C, Schmid MR, Pfirrmann CWA et al (2007) Peripheral tear of the triangular fibrocartilage: depiction with MR arthrography of the distal radioulnar joint. Am J Roentgenol 188:187–192.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.2056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maizlin ZV, Brown JA, Clement JJ et al (2009) MR arthrography of the wrist: controversies and concepts. Hand (N Y) 4:66–73.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-008-9149-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mariconda M, Cozzolino A, Di Pietto F et al (2014) Radiographic findings of femoroacetabular impingement in capoeira players. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 22:874–881.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-2850-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aprato A, Massè A, Faletti C et al (2013) Magnetic resonance arthrography for femoroacetabular impingement surgery: is it reliable? J Orthop Traumatol 14:201–206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-013-0227-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aliprandi A, Di Pietto F, Minafra P et al (2014) Femoro-acetabular impingement: what the general radiologist should know. Radiol Med 119:103–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0314-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Naraghi A, White LM (2015) MRI of labral and chondral lesions of the hip. Am J Roentgenol 205:479–490.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12581 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Datir A, Xing M, Kang J et al (2014) Diagnostic utility of MRI and MR arthrography for detection of ligamentum teres tears: a retrospective analysis of 187 patients with hip pain. Am J Roentgenol 203:418–423.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.12258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aubry S, Bélanger D, Giguère C, Lavigne M (2010) Magnetic resonance arthrography of the hip: technique and spectrum of findings in younger patients. Insights Imaging 1:72–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0023-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McCall DA, Safran MR (2012) MRI and arthroscopy correlations of the hip: a case-based approach. Instr Course Lect 61:327–344Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Di Pietto F, Chianca V, de Ritis R et al (2017) Postoperative imaging in arthroscopic hip surgery. Musculoskelet Surg 101:43–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0459-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Draghi F, Torresi M, Urciuoli L, Gitto S (2017) Magnetic resonance signal abnormalities within the pericruciate fat pad: a possible secondary sign for acute anterior cruciate ligament Tears. Can Assoc Radiol J 68:438–444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2017.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Masciocchi C, Barile A, Lelli S, Calvisi V (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthro-MRI in the evaluation of the chondral pathology of the knee joint. Radiol Med 108:149–158Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barile A, Conti L, Lanni G et al (2013) Evaluation of medial meniscus tears and meniscal stability: weight-bearing MRI vs arthroscopy. Eur J Radiol 82:633–639.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bruno F, Barile A, Arrigoni F et al (2018) Weight-bearing MRI of the knee: a review of advantages and limits. Acta Biomed 89:78–88Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zappia M, Reginelli A, Chianca V et al (2018) MRI of popliteo-meniscal fasciculi of the knee: a pictorial review. Acta Biomed 89:7–17Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Barile A, Bruno F, Arrigoni F et al (2017) Emergency and trauma of the ankle. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 21:282–289.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1602408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Albano D, Martinelli N, Bianchi A et al (2017) Clinical and imaging outcome of osteochondral lesions of the talus treated using autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis technique with a biomimetic scaffold. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18:306.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1679-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Albano D, Martinelli N, Bianchi A et al (2017) Evaluation of reproducibility of the MOCART score in patients with osteochondral lesions of the talus repaired using the autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis technique. Radiol Med 122:909–917.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0794-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Donovan A, Rosenberg ZS (2010) MRI of Ankle and Lateral Hindfoot Impingement Syndromes. Am J Roentgenol 195:595–604.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.4199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chou M-C, Yeh L-R, Chen CK-H et al (2006) Comparison of plain MRI and MR arthrography in the evaluation of lateral ligamentous injury of the ankle joint. J Chin Med Assoc 69:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reginelli A, Zappia M, Barile A, Brunese L (2017) Strategies of imaging after orthopedic surgery. Musculoskelet Surg 101:1.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-017-0458-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Corazza A, Orlandi D, Baldari A et al (2013) Thigh muscles injuries in professional soccer players: a one year longitudinal study. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 3:331–336Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Maffulli N, Del Buono A, Oliva F et al (2015) Muscle injuries: a brief guide to classification and management. Transl Med UniSa 12:14–18Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Doniselli FM, Albano D, Chianca V et al (2017) Gadolinium accumulation after contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: what rheumatologists should know. Clin Rheumatol 36:977–980.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-017-3604-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Barile A, Arrigoni F, Bruno F et al (2017) Computed tomography and MR imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. Radiol Clin North Am 55:997–1007.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2017.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pozzi G, Albano D, Messina C et al (2018) Solid bone tumors of the spine: diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient measured using diffusion-weighted MRI using histology as a reference standard. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:1034–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25826 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Robba T, Chianca V, Albano D et al (2017) Diffusion-weighted imaging for the cellularity assessment and matrix characterization of soft tissue tumour. Radiol Med 122:871–879.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0787-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lee YJ, Sadigh S, Mankad K et al (2016) The imaging of osteomyelitis. Quant Imaging Med Surg 6:184–198.  https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2016.04.01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Koltzenburg M, Bendszus M (2004) Imaging of peripheral nerve lesions. Curr Opin Neurol 17:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Albano D, Grutta L, Grassedonio E (2016) Pitfalls in whole body MRI with diffusion weighted imaging performed on patients with lymphoma: what radiologists should know. Magn Reson Imaging.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2016.04.023 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Barile A, Regis G, Masi R et al (2007) Musculoskeletal tumours: preliminary experience with perfusion MRI. Radiol Med 112:550–561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-007-0161-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Bellelli
    • 1
  • Enzo Silvestri
    • 2
  • Antonio Barile
    • 3
  • Domenico Albano
    • 4
    Email author
  • Alberto Aliprandi
    • 5
  • Roberto Caudana
    • 6
  • Vito Chianca
    • 4
  • Francesco Di Pietto
    • 7
  • Carlo Faletti
    • 8
  • Eugenio Genovese
    • 9
  • Andrea Giovagnoni
    • 10
  • Carlo Masciocchi
    • 3
  • Carmelo Messina
    • 4
    • 11
  • Luca Maria Sconfienza
    • 4
    • 11
  • Vincenzo Spina
    • 12
  • Marcello Zappia
    • 13
  1. 1.Unità Operativa Complessa di Radiologia Diagnostica ed InterventisticaRomeItaly
  2. 2.S.C. di Diagnostica per Immagini ed Ecografia InterventisticaOspedale Evangelico InternazionaleGenovaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Applied Clinical Science and BiotechnologyUniversity of L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly
  4. 4.Unità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica ed InterventisticaIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico GaleazziMilanoItaly
  5. 5.Unità di Radiologia, Istituti Clinici ZucchiMonzaItaly
  6. 6.Private practiceVeronaItaly
  7. 7.Dipartimento di Diagnostica per ImmaginiPineta Grande HospitalCastel Volturno (CE)Italy
  8. 8.Unità di Diagnostica per ImmaginiTorinoItaly
  9. 9.Università degli Studi di VareseBusto ArsizioItaly
  10. 10.Radiologia Pediatrica e Specialistica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali RiunitiUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly
  11. 11.Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  12. 12.U.O. Radiologia generale ed Urgenza Ospedale Civile Sant’Agostino EstenseAzienda Universitaria Ospedaliera ModenaModenaItaly
  13. 13.Dipartimento di Medicina e di Scienze della SaluteUniversità degli Studi del MoliseCampobassoItaly

Personalised recommendations