Preoperative assessment of simple and complex anorectal fistulas: Tridimensional endoanal ultrasound? Magnetic resonance? Both?
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) and magnetic resonance (MR) in the preoperative assessment of both simple and complex anorectal fistulas.
All the patients referred for the treatment of anal fistulas were enrolled in this study and underwent, as preoperative assessment, anamnestic evaluation, clinical examination, and unenhanced and H2O2-enhanced 3D-EAUS and MR. The results of imaging evaluation were compared with surgical findings, considered as reference standard.
During the study period, 124 patients operated on for anal fistulas underwent complete preoperative imaging assessment. Perfect agreement between 3D-EAUS and surgery in the anal fistulas’ severity grading was found (K = 1). The fistulas were classified as simple in 68/126 (53.9%) and complex in 58/126 (46.03%) cases, according to fistulas’ Parks’ classification and the most recent American Guidelines. In both simple and complex anal fistulas, 3D-EAUS did not show a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of internal openings, if compared with MR (P = 0.47; McNemar’s Chi-square test). In the complex anal fistulas, MR showed a significantly higher accuracy in the evaluation of secondary extensions if compared with 3D-EAUS (P = 0.041; McNemar’s Chi-square test), whereas in the simple anal fistulas, no significant difference was found.
In the preoperative work-up of patients with anorectal fistulas, 3D-EAUS may represent the first-line diagnostic tool. In cases of fistulas classified as complex by 3D-EAUS, MR may be indicated as adjunctive diagnostic imaging examination, to more carefully describe the fistulas’ complete anatomy.
Keywords3D-EAUS Endoanal ultrasound Magnetic resonance Anal fistulas Anal abscess Diagnostic accuracy
Tridimensional endoanal ultrasound
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 9.Lo Re G, Tudisca C, Vernuccio F, Picone D, Cappello M, Agnello F, Galia M, Galfano MC, Biscaldi E, Salerno S, Pinto A, Midiri M, Lagalla R (2016) MR imaging of perianal fistulas in Crohn’s disease: sensitivity and specificity of STIR sequences. Radiol Med 121(4):243–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0603-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Foti PV, Farina R, Coronella M, Palmucci S, Ognibene N, Milone P, Conti Bellocchi C, Samperi L, Inserra G, Laghi A, Ettorre GC (2015) Crohn’s disease of the small bowel: evaluation of ileal inflammation by diffusion-weighted MR imaging and correlation with the Harvey–Bradshaw index. Radiol Med 120(7):585–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0502-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Emile SH, Magdy A, Youssef M, Thabet W, Abdelnaby M, Omar W, Khafagy W (2017) Utility of endoanal ultrasonography in assessment of primary and recurrent anal fistulas and for detection of associated anal sphincter defects. J Gastrointest Surg 21(11):1879–1887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3574-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Brillantino A, Iacobellis F, Di Sarno G, D’Aniello F, Izzo D, Paladino F, De Palma M, Castriconi M, Grassi R, Di Martino N, Renzi A (2015) Role of tridimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in the preoperative assessment of perianal sepsis. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(4):535–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-015-2167-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.West RL, Zimmerman DD, Dwarkasing S, Hussain SM, Hop WC, Schouten WR, Kuipers EJ, Felt-Bersma RJ (2003) Prospective comparison of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging of perianal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 46(10):1407–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, Fernandes GO, Buchen G, Kenmoti VT, Soares Gdos S, Holanda Ede C (2011) Anatomic characteristics of anal fistula on three-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography. Dis Colon Rectum 54(4):460–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182060c84 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, Holanda Ede C, Barreto RG, Oliveira L (2010) The role of 3-dimensional anorectal ultrasonography in the assessment of anterior transsphincteric fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 53(7):1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181dce163 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Carbonetti F, Cremona A, Carusi V, Guidi M, Iannicelli E, Di Girolamo M, Sergi D, Clarioni A, Baio G, Antonelli G, Fratini L, David V (2016) The role of contrast enhanced computed tomography in the diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis and comparison with the laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC). Radiol Med 121(2):106–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0575-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar