Crossed cerebellar hyperperfusion in patients with seizure-related cerebral cortical lesions: an evaluation with arterial spin labelling perfusion MR imaging
Crossed cerebellar (CC) diaschisis refers to a decrease in cerebellar perfusion in the presence of contralateral supratentorial lesions. Most of the previous studies have examined stroke patients. In contrast to strokes, seizure-related cerebral cortical lesions (SCCLs) usually show hyperperfusion, and therefore, cerebellar perfusion patterns are expected to be different from those of strokes. With arterial spin labelling (ASL), we evaluated the cerebellar perfusion status in patients with SCCLs.
Materials and methods
Using a search of the recent database over the last 31 months, 26 patients were enrolled in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) a history of seizures, (2) MR examination taken within 24 h from the last seizure, (3) the presence of SCCLs on T2/FLAIR or DWI, (4) hyperperfusion in the corresponding areas of SCCLs on ASL, and (5) no structural abnormality in the cerebellum. The perfusion status in the contralateral cerebellum was evaluated and categorized as hyper-, iso- and hypoperfusion. The asymmetric index (AI) of cerebellar perfusion was calculated by ROI measurement of the signal intensity on ASL.
The mean time between the last seizure and MR examinations was 5 h 30 min. CC hyperperfusion was observed in 17 patients (65.4%), hypoperfusion in 7 (26.9%) and isoperfusion in 2 (7.7%). Regarding the location of SCCLs, CC hyperperfusion was more frequent (71.4 vs. 58.3%), and the mean AI was higher (42.0 vs. 11.5) when the lesion involved the frontal lobe.
In patients with SCCLs, CC hyperperfusion occurred more often than hypo- and isoperfusion, especially when the lesions involved the frontal lobe.
KeywordsSeizure Cerebral cortical lesion Perfusion MR Arterial spin labelling (ASL) Crossed cerebellar diaschisis Crossed cerebellar hyperperfusion
The authors would like to thank ‘Wiley Editing Services’ for the English: http://authorservices.wiley.com/bauthor/english_language.asp.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional review board (IRB) after its approval and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Our IRB determined that patient approval and informed consent were not required because of retrospectively reviewing images and records.
- 21.Shinohara Y, Kato A, Kuya K et al (2017) Perfusion MR imaging using a 3D pulsed continuous arterial spin-labeling method for acute cerebral infarction classified as branch atheromatous disease involving the lenticulostriate artery territory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:1550–1554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar