Advertisement

The pathology of soft tissue sarcomas

  • Marta Sbaraglia
  • Angelo P. Dei Tos
ONCOLOGY IMAGING

Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies exhibiting mesenchymal differentiation with an overall incidence of around 5/100,000/year. Rarity and morphologic heterogeneity significantly affect diagnostic accuracy; therefore, expertise can be achieved only through access to large number of cases. Soft tissue sarcomas are currently classified on the basis of the 2013 WHO classification of soft tissue tumors that integrate conventional morphology with immunohistochemistry and molecular genetics. The morphologic diagnosis of sarcoma relies on the evaluation as well as the integration of four main features: the shape of the neoplastic cells; the pattern of growth; the quality of the background; the architecture of the vascular network. Immunohistochemical characterization plays a key role in the diagnostic workup of soft tissue sarcomas. The majority of classic differentiation markers tend to show good sensitivity, however, associated with rather limited specificity, making interpretation in context with morphology mandatory. Molecular genetics is increasingly used for diagnostic purposes to distinguish specific subtypes of sarcomas, to support diagnosis in non-canonical clinical presentations and also to distinguish true sarcomas from benign mimickers. With many exceptions, histologic typing does not provide sufficient information for predicting the clinical course of the disease and, therefore, grading systems based on histological parameters were introduced to provide a more accurate estimation of the degree of malignancy of tumors. The three-tiered system devised by the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group (FNCLCC) systems is widely adopted; however, several limitations exist that have led to the development of prognostic nomograms that incorporate the specific histotype as one of the relevant parameters.

Keywords

Soft tissue sarcoma Immunohistochemistry Molecular genetics 

Notes

Funding

This study was not funded.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

AP Dei Tos has received speaker honoraria from PFIZER, Lilly Oncology; PharmaMar. M. Sbaraglia as received a speaker honorarium from PharmaMar.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Ray-Coquard I, Montesco MC, Coindre JM et al (2012) Sarcoma: concordance between initial diagnosis and centralized expert review in a population-based study within three European regions. Ann Oncol 23:2442–2449CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F (eds) (2013) Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone, 4th edn. IARC Press, LyonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F (eds) (2002) Pathology and genetics of tumors of soft tissue and bone. WHO classification of tumours. IARC Press, LyonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ballinger ML, Goode DL, Ray-Coquard I et al (2016) International Sarcoma Kindred Study. Monogenic and polygenic determinants of sarcoma risk: an international genetic study. Lancet Oncol 17:1261–1271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barretina J, Taylor BS, Banerji S et al (2010) Subtype-specific genomic alterations define new targets for soft-tissue sarcoma therapy. Nat Genet 42:715–721CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brenca M, Maestro R (2015) Massive parallel sequencing in sarcoma pathobiology: state of the art and perspectives. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 15:1473–1488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Electronic address: elizabeth.demicco@sinaihealthsystem.ca; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2017) Comprehensive and integrated genomic characterization of adult soft tissue sarcomas. Cell 171:950–965.e28Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hornick JL (2014) Novel uses of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and classification of soft tissue tumors. Mod Pathol 27:S47–S63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miettinen M (2014) Immunohistochemistry of soft tissue tumors—review with emphasis on 10 markers. Histopathology 64:101–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neuville A, Ranchère-Vince D, Dei Tos AP et al (2013) Impact of molecular analysis on the final sarcoma diagnosis: a study on 763 cases collected during a European epidemiological study. Am J Surg Pathol 37:1259–1268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dei Tos AP (2013) A current perspective on the role for molecular studies in soft tissue tumor pathology. Semin Diagn Pathol 30:375–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schaefer IM, Cote GM, Hornick JL (2018) Contemporary sarcoma diagnosis, genetics and genomics. J Clin Oncol 36:101–110Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walther C, Tayebwa J, Lilljebjorn H et al (2014) A novel SERPINE1-FOSB fusion gene results in transcriptional up-regulation of FOSB in pseudomyogenic haemangioendothelioma. J Pathol 23:534–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Le Loarer F, Pissaloux D, Coindre JM, Tirode F, Vince DR (2017) Update on families of round cell sarcomas other than classical ewing sarcomas. Surg Pathol Clin 10:587–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sirvent N, Coindre JM, Maire G et al (2007) Detection of MDM2-CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 200 paraffin-embedded tumor samples: utility in diagnosing adipocytic lesions and comparison with immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR. Am J Surg Pathol 31:1476–1489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mertens F, Fletcher CD, Antonescu CR et al (2005) Clinicopathologic and molecular genetic characterization of low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, and cloning of a novel FUS/CREB3L1 fusion gene. Lab Invest 85:408–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Colombo C, Bolshakov S, Hajibashi S et al (2011) ‘Difficult to diagnose’ desmoid tumours: a potential role for CTNNB1 mutational analysis. Histopathology 59:336–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chibon F, Lagarde P, Salas S et al (2010) Validated prediction of clinical outcome in sarcomas and multiple types of cancer on the basis of a gene expression signature related to genome complexity. Nat Med 16:781–787CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Casali PG, Dei Tos AP, Gronchi A (2015) Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. In: Rosenberg SA, DeVita VT, Hellman S (eds) De Vita, Hellman, Rosenberg’s cancer. Principles and practice of oncology, 10th edn. Wolters Kluver, Philadelphia, pp 745–756Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Butrynski JE, D’Adamo DR, Hornick JL et al (2010) Crizotinib in ALK-rearranged inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. N Engl J Med 28(363):1727–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stacchiotti S, Pantaleo MA, Negri T et al (2016) Efficacy and biological activity of imatinib in metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). Clin Cancer Res 22:837–846CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brenca M, Rossi S, Polano M et al (2016) Transcriptome sequencing identifies ETV6-NTRK3 as a gene fusion involved in GIST. J Pathol 238:543–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tap WD, Wainberg ZA, Anthony SP et al (2015) Structure-guided blockade of CSF1R kinase in tenosynovial giant-cell tumor. N Engl J Med 30(373):428–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guillou L, Coindre JM, Bonichon F et al (1997) Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 15:350–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coindre JM, Terrier P, Guillou L et al (2001) Predictive value of grade for metastasis development in the main histologic types of adult soft tissue sarcomas: a study of 1240 patients from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group. Cancer 91:1914–1926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Callegaro D, Miceli R, Bonvalot S et al (2016) Development and external validation of two nomograms to predict overall survival and occurrence of distant metastases in adults after surgical resection of localised soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 1:671–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PathologyAzienda ULSS 2 “Marca Trevigiana”TrevisoItaly
  2. 2.Department of MedicineUniversity of Padua School of MedicinePaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations