Application of ASiR in combination with noise index in the chest CT examination of preschool-age children
- 19 Downloads
To evaluate the application of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) for chest CT scans of preschool-age children.
Sixty children, ages 0 to < 1, 1 to < 3, and 3 to < 6 years, who underwent CT non-contrast-enhanced and enhanced scans were included. The non-contrast-enhanced scan sequences were performed with noise indexes (NIs) of 11, 14, and 16 for the 0 to < 1, 1 to < 3, and 3 to < 6 year age groups, respectively. Collected data were reconstructed using ASIR in increments of 10%, ranging from 0 to 100%, to generate 11 image groups. The signal-to-noise ratio, image noise, and other features of images obtained using ASIR with different weights were compared and analyzed. The best weight ranges for ASIR of chest CT scans of children at different ages within the range of 0–6 years were obtained. Enhanced scan sequence: The NI default was 9, and the data were subjected to the filtered back projection reconstruction algorithm. All other scanning parameters were the same as those used in the non-contrast-enhanced scan sequence.
In the 0 to < 1 year group, the image qualities were scored as 3 or above with ASIR weights of 50% for the lung window and 40% for the mediastinal window; in the 1 to < 3 year group, the image qualities were scored as 3 or above with ASIR weights of 60% for the lung window and 50% for the mediastinal window; in the 3 to < 6 year group, the image qualities were scored as 3 or above with ASIR weights of 70% for the lung window and 60% for the mediastinal window.
For low-dose chest CT scans of preschool-age children, application of the ASIR technique significantly improved image quality and reduced image noise. The optimum weights of image ASIR were 50%, 60%, and 70% for the lung window and 40%, 50%, and 60% for the mediastinal window for the 0 to < 1, 1 to < 3, and 3 to < 6 year groups, respectively.
KeywordsAdaptive statistical iterative reconstruction Noise index Children Chest X-ray computed tomography
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 4.Gervaise A, Naulet P, Henry C, Pernin M, Portron Y, Lapierre-Combes M (2014) Low-dose CT with automatic tube current modulation, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and low tube voltage for the diagnosis of renal colic: impact of body mass index. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202(3):553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.American Association of Physicists in Medicine. AAPM report no. 96: the measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/RPT_96.pdf. Accessed 2011-01-04
- 13.Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, Howe NL, Ronckers CM, Rajaraman P, Sir Craft AW, Parker L, Berrington deGonzalez A (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380(9840):499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Widmann G, Bischel A, Stratis A, Kakar A, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Gassner EM, Puelacher W, Pauwels R (2016) Ultralow dose dentomaxillofacial CT imaging and iterative reconstruction techniques: variability of Hounsfield units and contrast-to-noise ratio. Br J Radiol 89(1060):20151055CrossRefGoogle Scholar