Errors in multidetector row computed tomography
- 242 Downloads
Multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) represents the technique of choice for the majority of pathologies today and is responsible for the majority of diagnoses. However, despite the low number of studies dedicated to errors in MDCT, CT reporting seems especially prone to generating errors and errors are an inevitable part of MDCT practice. Most of these arise during image interpretation but, differently from other radiological techniques, the awareness of radiologists regarding technical CT aspects and pathologies substantially contribute in generating errors, in particular because CT technology expands rapidly and radiologists do not routinely receive specific and appropriate training for its use and because CT examinations are not the same for each patient and each pathology and the choice of the most appropriate CT examination (including the dose exposure to the patient) presumes a very large awareness from radiologists. This review is aimed at increasing awareness regarding the type of errors in MDCT and in particular to also highlight technical and procedural errors.
KeywordsMultidetector row computed tomography Medical error Diagnostic error Dose CT
The Authors thank Ms. Julia Hassall for reviewing the English language and Dr. Susanna Guerrini for editorial assistance in the manuscript and images preparation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The submission of this manuscript for publication has been approved by all the authors and by the appropriate authority at the Institution where the work was carried out.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 4.AHRQ (2003) AHRQ’s Patient safety initiative building foundations, reducting risk. Interim report to the senate Committee on appropriateness. Rockville, AHRQ Publications, 04-RG005. http://archive.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/pscongrpt/psini2.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2015
- 13.Mazzei MA, Khader L, Cirigliano A, Cioffi Squitieri N, Guerrini S, Forzoni B, Marrelli D, Roviello F, Mazzei FG, Volterrani L (2013) Accuracy of MDCT in the preoperative definition of Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent peritonectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Abdom Imaging 38:1422–1430. doi: 10.1007/s00261-013-0013-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Mazzei MA, Scialpi M, Mazzei FG, Giacobone G, Volterrani L (2010) Three-dimensional volumetric assessment with thoracic CT: a reliable approach for non calcified lung nodules? Radiology 254:634; author reply 635. doi: 10.1148/radiol.091655
- 16.Marrelli D, Mazzei MA, Pedrazzani C, Di Martino M, Vindigni C, Corso G, Morelli E, Volterrani L, Roviello F (2011) High accuracy of multislices computed tomography (MSCT) for para-aortic lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: a prospective single-center study. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2265–2272. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1541-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Mazzei MA, Mazzei FG, Marrelli D, Imbriaco G, Guerrini S, Vindigni C, Civitelli S, Roviello F, Grassi R, Volterrani L (2012) Computed tomographic evaluation of mesentery: diagnostic value in acute mesenteric ischemia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:1–7. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31823b4465 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Fillippone A, Cianci R, Iezzi R, Legnini M, Storto ML (2009) Effect of clinical history in focal liver lesion detection and classification on 4-detector row computed tomography and gadoxetic acid enhanced MR imaging in oncologic patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:851–857. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181a63e1e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.American College of Radiology (2010) ACR practice guideline for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. In: 2010 ACR practice guideline for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, p 6Google Scholar