La radiologia medica

, Volume 118, Issue 7, pp 1212–1219 | Cite as

Fiducial markers for image-guided partial breast irradiation

  • Marco Trovo
  • Jerry Polesel
  • Cristina Biasutti
  • Giovanna Sartor
  • Mario Roncadin
  • Gaetano Mauro Trovo
Radiotherapy / Radioterapia



This study was undertaken to study the role of fiducial markers for image-guided partial breast irradiation (IG-PBI), and to compare the shifts based on bony anatomy and fiducial markers.

Materials and methods

Fifteen patients underwent IGPBI. Three fiducial markers were placed in the tumour bed at the time of surgery. Daily orthogonal anterior/ posterior and lateral kV-images were taken before each fraction and compared with the digitally-reconstructed radiographs, both using bony landmarks and fiducial markers as reference. The Student’s t test was used to detect a meaningful difference of 3 mm in between the two methods.


A total of 105 image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) sessions were obtained. The mean superior/inferior, right/left, and anterior/posterior shifts obtained using the bony landmarks vs. the fiducial markers were 2 mm [standard deviation (SD) 10 mm] vs. 0 mm (SD 7 mm), 0 mm (SD 7 mm) vs. 1 mm (SD 4 mm), and 1 mm (SD 7 mm) vs. 0 mm (SD 5 mm), respectively. The mean shift differences in absolute value between the two methods, along the superior/inferior, right/left and anterior/posterior directions were 5 mm (p=0.001), 3 mm [p=not significant (ns)], and 3 mm (p=ns), respectively.


Fiducial markers for IG-PBI increase set-up accuracy compared to the bony landmarks, in particular along the superior/inferior direction.


Image-guided radiation therapy Partial breast irradiation Fiducial markers 

Marcatori fiduciali nella radioterapia parziale della mammella guidata dalle immagini



Scopo del presente lavoro è stato studiare il ruolo dei marcatori fiduciali nell’irradiazione parziale della mammella guidata dalle immagini (IG-PBI) e confrontare gli spostamenti basati sui reperi ossei rispetto ai marcatori fiduciali.

Materiali e metodi

Sono state sottoposte a IG-PBI 15 pazienti. Al momento della chirurgia sono stati posizionati tre marcatori fiduciali nel letto tumorale. Prima di ogni frazione giornaliera di radioterapia sono state ottenute immagini kV ortogonali e confrontate con le radiografie ricostruite digitalmente, utilizzando come riferimento reperi ossei e marcatori fiduciali. è stato utilizzato il test t di Student per identificare differenze significative di 3 mm tra i due metodi.


Sono state studiate 105 sessioni di radioterapia guidata dalle immagini (IGRT). Gli spostamenti medi nella direzione superiore/inferiore, destra/sinistra e anteriore/posteriore ottenuti utilizzando i reperi ossei vs. i marcatori fiduciali sono risultati di 2 mm [deviazione standard (SD) 10 m] vs. 0 mm (SD 7 mm), 0 mm (SD 7 mm) vs. 1 mm (SD 4 mm), e 1 mm (SD 7 mm) vs. 0 mm (SD 5 mm), rispettivamente. La differenza media in valore assoluto tra gli spostamenti ottenuti con i due metodi nelle direzioni superiore/inferiore, destra/sinistra e anteriore/ posteriore sono risultati di 5 mm (p=0,001), 3 mm [p=non significativo (ns)], e 3 mm (p=ns), rispettivamente.


L’ utilizzo di marcatori fiduciali nella IG-PBI permette di migliorare l’accuratezza del set-up rispetto all’allineamento basato sui reperi ossei, in particolare nella direzione superiore/inferiore.

Parole chiave

Radioterapia guidata dalle immagini Irradiazione parziale della mammella Marcatori fiduciali 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1227–1232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baglan KL, Sharpe MB, Jaffray D et al (2003) Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy (3D-CRT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:302–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vicini F, Remouchamps M, Wallace M et al (2003) Ongoing clinical experience utilizing 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy to deliver partial breast irradiation in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy. Proc Am Soc Radiol Oncol 57:364Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dawson LA, Sharpe MB (2006) Imageguided radiotherapy: rationale, benefits, and limitations. Lancet Oncol 7:848–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leonard CE, Tallhamer M, Johnson T et al (2010) Clinical experience with image-guided radiotherapy in an accelerated partial breast intensitymodulated radiotherapy protocol. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:528–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Trovo M, Sartor G, Chiovati P et al (2010) Forward Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Partial Breast Irradiation Confers High Dose Homogeneity and Conformation to the Target Volume. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:S747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    White EA, Cho J, Vallis KA et al (2007) Cone beam computed tomography guidance for setup of patients receiving accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:547–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Trovo
    • 1
  • Jerry Polesel
    • 2
  • Cristina Biasutti
    • 1
  • Giovanna Sartor
    • 3
  • Mario Roncadin
    • 1
  • Gaetano Mauro Trovo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento OncologicoCROAviano (PN)Italy
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centro di Riferimento OncologicoCROAviano (PN)Italy
  3. 3.Department of Medical Physics, Centro di Riferimento OncologicoCROAviano (PN)Italy

Personalised recommendations