Abstract
Purpose
The aim of our study was to evaluate the presence of dynamic foraminal stenosis using a new low-field dedicated magnetic resonance (MR) unit with a balancing system that allows images to be acquired both in the recumbent and upright position. Imaging of lumbar spine with the patient in a supine, nonweight-bearing position is likely to misrepresent the degree and potential risk of spinal stenosis.
Materials and methods
In the period between September 2008 and May 2011, we selected 630 symptomatic patients aged 40–65 years (mean age 56) who underwent conventional MR in clinostatic position. The study only included selected patients (total 160) who underwent clinostatic and orthostatic evaluation using a dedicated MR system (G-scan). The biomechanical parameters were also considered. Changes in the dimension of the neural foramina were compared using the presence of disc and facet degeneration by statistical analysis.
Results
Stenosis of the intervertebral foramen was never found in the presence of normal intervertebral discs either in the presence or in the absence of facet disease, in either clinostatic or orthostatic position. Sixty-one stenotic levels were detected which were visualised exclusively in scans obtained under weight-bearing conditions. We named this dynamic condition “occult stenosis”. In all of these cases, disc disease was associated with facet pathology.
Conclusion
Our data show that the association between disc pathology and facet osteoarthrosis can cause occult foraminal stenosis. Strategies to image the spine under physiological load conditions may improve the clinical diagnosis of radicular pain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Verbiest H (1954) A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg 36/B:230–237
Verbiest H (1955) Further experience in the pathological influence of a developmental narrowness of the body lumbar vertebral canal. J Bone Joint Surg 37/B:576–583
Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH et al (2009) Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham study. Spine J 9:545–550
Taylor VM, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Kreuter W (1994) Low back pain hospitalization. Recent United States trends and regional variations. Spine 19:1207–1212
Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N et al (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without low back pain. New Eng J Med 331(2):69–73
Danielson B, Willen J (2001) Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals. Spine 26(23):2601–2606
Benoist M (2002) The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis. Joint Bone Spine 69:450–457
Weishaupt D (1998) MR imaging of the lumbar spine: disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, endplate abnormalities and osteoarthritis of the facet joint are rare in asymptomatic volunteers. Radiology 209(3):661–666
Nowicki BH, Haughton VM, Schmidt TA (1996) Occult lumbar lateral spinal stenosis. AJNR 17:1605–1614
Gregory E, Hicks PT, Morone N, Weiner DK (2009) Degenerative lumbar disc and facet disease in older adults: prevalence and clinical correlates. Spine 34(12):1301–1306
Kent DL, Haynor DR, Larson EB, Deyo RA (1992) Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR and myelography. AJR 158:1135–1144
Jinkins JR, Dworkin JS, Damadian RV (2005) Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic-kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results. Eur Radiol 15:1815–1825
Wildermuth S, Zanetti M, Duewell S et al (1998) Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography. Radiology 208(3):834
Schönström N, Lindahl S, Willén J, Hansson T (1989) Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: an experimental study in vitro. J Orthop Res 7(1):115–121
Ferreiro Perez A, Garcia Isidro M, Ayerbe E et al (2007) Evaluation of intervertebral disc herniation and hypermobile intersegmental instability in symptomatic adult patients undergoing recumbent and upright MRI of the cervical or lumbosacral spines. Eur J Radiol 62:444–448
Alyas F, Sutcliffe J, Connell D, Saifuddin A (2010) Morphological change and development of high-intensity zones in the lumbar spine from neutral to extension positioning during upright MRI. Clin Radiol 65(2):176–180
Haugton VM, Lim TH (1999) Intervertebral disk appearance correlated with stiffness of lumbar spinal motion segments. AJNR 20(6):1161–1165
Weishaupt D, Schmid MR, Zanetti M et al (2000) Positional MR imaging of the lumbar spine: does it demonstrate nerve root compromise not visible at conventional MR imaging? Radiology 215(1):247–253
Hutton WC, Toribatake Y, Elmer WA et al (1998) The effect of compressive force applied to the intervertebral disc in vivo: A study of proteoglycans and collagen. Spine 23(23):2524–2537
Adams MA, Hutton WC (1980) The effect of posture on the role of the apophysial joints in resisting intervertebral compressive forces. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62(3):358–362
Gilbert JW, Wheeler GR, Lingreen RA, Johnson RRJ (2006) Open stand-up MRI: a new instrument for positional neuroimaging. Spinal Disord Tech 19(2):151–154
Moojen WA, Arts MP, Brand R et al (2010) The Felix-trial. Double blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication. BMC Muscoloskelet Disord 11:100
Chiu JC (2006) Interspinous process decompression (IPD) system (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Surg Technol Int 15:265–275
Conflict of interest
Alessandra Splendiani, Fabiana Ferrari, Antonio Barile, Carlo Masciocchi, Massimo Gallucci declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Splendiani, A., Ferrari, F., Barile, A. et al. Occult neural foraminal stenosis caused by association between disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis: demonstration with dedicated upright MRI system. Radiol med 119, 164–174 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0330-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-013-0330-7