Advertisement

Potential of the Blattisocius mali Mite (Acari: Blattisociidae) as a Biological Control Agent of Potato Tubermoth (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Stored Potatoes

  • J. R. Gallego
  • M. Gamez
  • T. CabelloEmail author
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Potato tubermoth (PTM) Phthorimaea operculella (Lep.: Gelechiidae) is one of the pest species affecting Solanaceae worldwide. It can cause up to 80% of losses in potato open air crops as well as damage up to 100% of tubers during storage. Blattisocius (= Typhlodromus) mali (Acari: Blattisociidae), a predatory mite, was studied as a potential biological control agent of PTM. A prey acceptance bioassay of PTM eggs was carried out. Additionally, two bioassays have been conducted under microcosm conditions, which assessed the densities of mite releases at two levels of PTM infestation. The results showed that B. mali female adults accept PTM eggs as prey, and they cause a mortality rate 89.63 ± 2.47%, 48 h later. In addition to this, under microcosm conditions with potato tubers, we found at low infestation level that the effectiveness of the predatory mite varied from 72.50 ± 28.50 to 100%, 28 days later, according to the release rate of mites. Under high infestation level, the effectiveness of biological control of the pest varied from 53.36 ± 25.55 to 92.51 ± 7.88%, also according to the release rate of the mites. The possible use of biological control with B. mali of PTM, in different types of potato storage, is analysed and discussed.

Keywords

Non-refrigerated storage Phthorimaea operculella Prey acceptance 

Notes

Funding Information

This work has been funded within the project titled: Development of new methods for the integrated management of potato moths Phthorimaea operculella and Tecia solanivora (Ref.: RTA2015-00074-C02-00). It was funded within the programme of main research projects in 2015 and complementary actions within the framework of the state programme R + D + I aimed at society challenges (safety and food quality challenge, sustainable and productive agrarian activity, sustainability of natural resources and sea and marine research). The National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA) and Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spain (and European Regional Development Fund, ERDF).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al-Ali AS, Al-Neamy IK, Abbas SA, Abdul-Masih AME (1975) Observations on the biology of the potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella zell. (Lep.: Gelechidae) in Iraq. 79:345–351Google Scholar
  2. Alonso-Arce F (2011) Prácticas de cultivo para realizar posteriormente un buen almacenaje de la patata. Vida Rural 335:50–54Google Scholar
  3. Andreadis SS, Poulia Y, Noukari S, Aslanidou B, Savopoulou-Soultani M (2016) Cold hardiness attributes of a field population of the potato tuberworm, Phthorimaeae operculella. Entomol Exp Appl 160:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthurs SP, Lacey LA, Roda FR (2008) Evaluation of a granulovirus (PoGV) and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki for control of the potato tuberworm (Lep.: Gelechiidae) in stored tubers. J Econ Entomol 101:1540–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aryal S, Jung C (2015) IPM tactics of potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lep.: Gelechiidae): literature study. Korean J Soil Zool 19:42–51Google Scholar
  6. Athanassious CG, Rumbos CI (2018) Emerging pests in durable stored products. In: Athanassiou CG, Arthur FH (eds) Recent advances in stored product. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baggen LR, Gurr GM (1998) The influence of food on Copidosoma koehleri (Hym.: Encyrtidae), and the use of flowering plants as habitat management tool to enhance biological control of potato moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lep.: Gelechiidae). Biol Control 11:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bethke PC (2014) Postharvest storage and physiology. In: Mark P (ed) The potato: botany, production and uses. Navarre R. CABI, Wallingford, pp 255–271Google Scholar
  9. CABI (2018) Phthorimaea operculella (potato tuber moth) http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/40686. Accessed 7 July 2017
  10. Credland P (2010) Stored products research in Europe—a very personal perspective! Julius Kühn Archiv 425:14–25Google Scholar
  11. Darst PH, King EW (1969) Biology of Melichares tarsalis in association with Plodia interpunctella. Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:747–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Das GP, Raman KV (1994) Alternate hosts of the potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella. Crop Prot 13:83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Moraes GJ, Venancio R, dos Santos VLV, Paschoal D (2015) Potential of Ascidae, Blattisociidae and Melicharidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) as biological control agents of pest organisms. In: Carrillo D, de Moraes GJ, Peña JE (eds) Prospects for biological control of plant feeding mites and other harmful organisms. Springer, Cham, pp 33–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dean BB (1994) Managing the potato production system. Food Products Press, BinghamtonGoogle Scholar
  15. Dogramaci M, Tingey WM (2008) Comparison of insecticide resistance in a North American field population and a laboratory colony of potato tuberworm (Lep.: Gelechiidae). J Pest Sci 81:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Douches D, Visser D, Coombs J, Zarka K, Felcher K, Bothma G, Brink J, Koch M, Quemada H (2010) Field and storage evaluations of ‘SpuntaG2’ for resistance to potato tuber moth and agronomic performance. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 135:333–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fenemore PG (1977) Oviposition of potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lep.: Gelechiidae); fecundity in relation to mated state, age, and pupal weight. N Z J Zool 4:187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flanders SE, Badgley ME (1963) Prey–predator interactions in self-balanced laboratory populations. Hilgardia 35(8):145–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallego JR, Mellado-López L, Cabello T (2019) Selection of a Trichogramma species (Hym., Trichogrammatidae) for the biological control of the potato moth Phthorimaea operculella (Lep., Gelechiidae) by host-parasitism behavioral study. ITEA-Inf Tec Econ Agr (in print)Google Scholar
  20. Gao Y (2018) Potato tuberworm: impact and methods for control. CAB Rev 13:1–3Google Scholar
  21. Gerson U, Smiley RL, Ochoa R (2003) Mites (Acari) for pest control. Blackwell Science Ltd., OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagstrum DW, Klejdysz T, Subramanyam B, Nawrot J (2013) Atlas of stored-product insects and mites. AACC International, Inc, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  23. Haines CP (1978) A revision of the genus Blattisocius Keegan (Mesostigmata: Ascidae) with especial reference to B. tarsalis and the description of a new species. Acarologia 20:19–38Google Scholar
  24. Haines CP (1981) Laboratory studies on the role of an egg predator, Blattisoicus tarsalis (Acari: Ascidae), in relation to the natural control of Ephestia cautella (Lep.: Pyralidae) in warehouses. Bull Entomol Res 71:557–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanafi A (1999) Integrated pest management of potato tuber moth in field. Potato Res 42:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hanafi A (2007) The canon of potato science: 17. Arthropods/insects. Potato Res 50:271–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hansen LS (2007a) Biological control of stored-product pests. In: Pimentel D (ed) Encyclopedia of pest management, vol II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 42–44Google Scholar
  28. Hansen LS (2007b) Potential for widespread application of biological control of stored-products pests-the European perspective. J Stored Prod Res 43:312–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansen LS, Nielsen PS, Jespersen JB, Eilenberg J, Enkegaard A, Hansen LM (2001) Biological control of the Mediterranean flour moth (Ephestia kuehniella) in flour mills. DJF Rapport Markbrug 49:105–110Google Scholar
  30. Hassan MF, Ali FS, Hussein AM, Mahgoub MH (2002) Biological studies on Macrocheles muscaedomesticae fed on different stages of potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 12:43–46Google Scholar
  31. Kathage J, Castañera P, Alonso-Prados JL, Gómez-Barbero M, Rodríguez-Cerezo E (2018) The impact of restrictions on neonicotinoid and fipronil on pest management in maize, oilseed rape and sunflower in eight European Union regions. Pest Manag Sci 74:88–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Keasar T, Sadeh A (2007) The parasitoid Copidosoma koehleri provides limited control of the potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella, in stored potatoes. Biol Control 42:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khorrami F, Mehrkhou F, Mahmoudian M, Ghosta Y (2018) Pathogenicity of three different entomopathogenic fungi, Metarhizium anisopliae, Nomuraea riley and Paecilomyces tenuipes against the potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lep.: Gelechiidae). Potato Res 61:297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krantz GW, Walter DE (2009) A manual of acarology, 3rd edn. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock 807 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Kroschel J, Koch W (1996) Studies on the use of chemicals, botanicals and Bacillus thuringiensis in the management of the potato tuber moth in potato stores. Crop Prot 15:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kroschel J, Schaub B (2013) Biology and ecology of potato tuber moths as major pests of potato. In: Giordanengo P, Vincent C, Alyokhin A (eds) Insect pests of potato. Academic, Amsterdam, pp 165–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuhar TP, Kamminga K, Philips C, Walingford A, Wimer A (2013) Chemical control of potato pest. In: Giordanengo P, Vincent C, Alyokhin A (eds) Insect pests of potato. Academic, Amsterdam, pp 375–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mandour NS, Sarhan AA, Atwa DH (2012) The integration between Trichogramma evanescens (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae) and selected bioinsecticides for controlling the potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella (Lep.: Gelechiidae) of stored potatoes. J Plant Prot Res.  https://doi.org/10.2478/v10045-012-0007-6
  39. Narenderan ST, Meyyanathan SN (2019) Sample treatment and determination of pesticide residues in potato matrices: a review. Potato Res 62:47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nesbitt НJ (1951) А taxonomic study of the Phytoseiinae (family Laelaptidae) predaceous upоп Tetranychidae of economic importance. Zool Verh Leiden 12:1–64Google Scholar
  41. Nielsen PS (1998) Blattisocius tarsalis, would this predatory mite be effective against moth eggs in Scandinavian flour mills? IOBC Bull 21:83–87Google Scholar
  42. Nielsen PS (1999a) The use of Blattisocius tarsalis (Acari: Ascidae) for biological control of flour mills. In: Jin Z, et al (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Working Conference on Stored-Product Protection, Beijing, pp 1265–1268Google Scholar
  43. Nielsen PS (1999b) The impact of temperature on activity and consumption rate of moth eggs by Blattisocius tarsalis (Acari: Ascidae). Exp Appl Acarol 23:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nielsen PS (2003) Predation by Blattisocius tarsalis (Acari: Ascidae) on eggs of Ephestia kuehniella (Lep.: Pyralidae). J Stored Prod Res 39:395–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oerke EC (2006) Crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci 144:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oudemans AC (1929) Acarologial notes, XCIX, C. Ent Ber 8:28–36Google Scholar
  47. Pascual-Villalobos MJ, Carreres R, Riudavets J, Aguilar M, Bozal JM, Garcia MC, Soler A, Baz A, de Estal P (2006) Plagas del arroz almacenado y sus enemigos naturales en España. Bol San Veg Plagas 32:223–229Google Scholar
  48. Pokharkar DS, Jogi RR (2000) Biological suppression of potato tubermoth, Phthorimaea operculella with exotic parasitoids and microbial agents under field and storage conditions. J Biol Control 14:23–28Google Scholar
  49. Radcliffe EB (1982) Insect pests of potato. Annu Rev Entomol 27:173–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rios D (2012) Las papas antiguas de Tenerife. Centro Conservación de la Biodiversidad Agrícola de Tenerife, TenerifeGoogle Scholar
  51. Riudavets J (2018) Biological control of stored products pests. IOBC WPRS Bull 130:107–109Google Scholar
  52. Riudavets J, Lucas E, Pons MJ (2002a) Insects and mites of stored products in the northeast of Spain. IOBC Bull 25(3):41–44Google Scholar
  53. Riudavets J, Maya M, Monserrat M (2002b) Predation by Blattisocius tarsalis (Acari: Ascidae) on stored product pests. IOBC Bull 25(3):121–126Google Scholar
  54. Robertson JL, Preisler HK (1992) Pesticide bioassays with arthropods. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  55. Rondon SI (2010) The potato tuberworm: a literature review of its biology, ecology, and control. Am J Potato Res 87:149–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Santos JC, Rueda-Ramirez D, Demite PR, Moraes GJ (2018) Ascidae, Blattisociidae and Melicharidae (Acari: Mesostigmata): zoogeographic analyses on newly available databases. Zootaxa 4377(4):542–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saour G (2004) Efficacy assessment of some Trichogramma species (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae) in controlling the potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella (Lep.: Gelechiidae). J Pest Sci 77:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saour G (2009) Effect of early oviposition experience on host acceptance in Trichogramma (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae) and application of F1 sterility and T. principium to suppress the potato tuber moth (Lep.: Gelechiidae). Biocontrol Sci Tech 19:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schöller M (2004) Potential use of biological control of stored-product pests in bakeries and mills. In: Hansen LS, Wakefield M, Lukas J, Stejskal V (eds) Proceedings WG IV: Biocontrol of arthropod pests in stored products. Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague, pp 31–37Google Scholar
  60. Schöller M (2010) Prospects for biological control of stored-product pests. Julius Kühn Archv 429:25–31Google Scholar
  61. Thomas HQ, Zalom FG, Nicola NL (2011) Laboratory studies of Blattisocius keegani (Acari: Ascidae) reared on eggs of navel orange worm: potential for biological control. Bull Entomol Res 11:1–6Google Scholar
  62. Trivedi TP, Rajagopal D (1992) Distribution, biology, ecology and management of potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lep.: Gelechiidae): a review. Int J Pest Manag 38:279–285Google Scholar
  63. Trivedi TP, Rajagopal D, Tandon PL (1994) Life table for establishment of potato tubermoth Phthorimaea operculella. J Indian Potato Assoc 21:97–105Google Scholar
  64. Urquijo L (1944) Ensayo del parasito útil Trichogramma minutum en la lucha contra la polilla de la patata. Bol Pat Veg Entomol Agri 13:281-300Google Scholar
  65. Vila E, Cabello T (2014) Biosystems engineering applied to greenhouse pest control. In: Torres I, Guevara R (eds) Biosystems engineering: biofactories for food production in the XXI century. Springer, Cham, pp 99–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. White EG, Huffaker CB (1969) Regulatory processes and population cyclicity in laboratory populations of Anagasta kuhniella (Lep.: Phycitidae). I. Competition for food and predation. Res Popul Ecol 11:57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association for Potato Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology and Geology, Higher Engineering SchoolUniversity of AlmeriaAlmeriaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Higher Engineering SchoolUniversity of AlmeriaAlmeriaSpain

Personalised recommendations