Advertisement

Rhizobacteria-Based Technology for Sustainable Cropping of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

  • B. N. AlooEmail author
  • E. R. Mbega
  • B. A. Makumba
Article

Abstract

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is one of the most important food crops worldwide but its cultivation is affected by numerous challenges including pests, diseases and high fertiliser requirements which have associated environmental problems. The exploitation of plant rhizospheres and their associated rhizobacterial interactions has gathered momentum worldwide in search of environmentally-friendly approaches to crop cultivation. A lot of literature exists on rhizobacterial associations and their biofertilisation or bioprotection roles in many plants. However, very scanty information is available on rhizobacterial functions and communities of the potato, an indication that they are still understudied. In this regard, more research is needed to understand and exploit them for the successful application of rhizobacteria-based technology in potato cropping. This review updates our knowledge of the beneficial rhizobacteria of the potato and documents their roles in its bioprotection, phytostimulation and biofertilisation while highlighting their potential in enhancing its production and productivity. The future prospects regarding the research on these important potato microflora are further discussed as a guide and a baseline for future research on them. This review shows that rhizobacteria-based technology is a viable option for potato biofertilisation and bioprotection and could be the missing link in its sustainable cropping. The adoption and full exploitation of this technology can be fast-tracked if we increase our understanding of the subject matter.

Keywords

Plant growth promotion Rhizobacteria Solanum tuberosum Sustainable agriculture 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adesemoye AO, Yuen G, Watts DB (2017) Microbial inoculants for optimized plant nutrient use in integrated pest and input management systems. In: Probiotics and plant health. Springer, Singapore, pp 21–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahemad M, Khan MS (2012) Effect of fungicides on plant growth promoting activities of phosphate solubilizing Pseudomonas putida isolated from mustard (Brassica compestris) rhizosphere. Chemosphere 86:945–950CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed HF, El-Araby MM (2012) Evaluation of the influence of nitrogen-fixing, phosphate solubilizing and potash mobilizing biofertilizers on growth, yield, and fatty acid constituents of oil in peanut and sunflower. Afr J Biotechnol 11:10079–10888Google Scholar
  4. Ali S, Hameed S, Imram A, Iqbal M, Lazarovits G (2014) Genetic, physiological and biochemical characterization of Bacillus sp. strain RMB7 exhibiting plant growth promoting and broad spectrum antifungal activities. Microb Cell Factories 13:144.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-014-0144-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aliye N, Fininsa C, Hiskias Y (2008) Evaluation of rhizosphere bacterial antagonists for their potential to bioprotect potato (Solanum tuberosum) against bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum). Biol Control 47:282–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alori ET, Glick BR, Babalola OO (2017) Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Front Microbiol 8:971.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00971 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Andreote FD, De Araújo WL, De Azevedo JL, Van Elsas JD, Da Rocha UN, van Overbeek LS (2009) Endophytic colonization of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) by a novel competent bacterial endophyte, Pseudomonas putida strain P9, and its effect on associated bacterial communities. Appl Environ Biol 75:3396–3406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Archana DS, Nandish MS, Savalagi VP, Alagawadi AR (2013) Characterization of potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB) from rhizosphere soil. Bioinfolet 10:248–257Google Scholar
  9. Ardanov P, Ovcharenko L, Zaets L, Kozyrovska N, Anna MP (2011) Endophytic bacteria enhancing growth and disease resistance of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Biol Control 56:43–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Arora NK, Tewari S, Singh S, Lal N, Maheshwari DK (2012) PGPR for protection of plant health under saline conditions. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Bacteria in agrobiology: stress management. Springer, Berlin, pp 239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arseneault T, Goyer C, Filion M (2013) Phenazine production by Pseudomonas sp. LBUM233 contributes to the biological control of potato common scab. Phytopathology 103:995–1000CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Arseneault T, Goyer C, Filion M (2015) Pseudomonas fluorescens LBUM233 increases potato yield and reduces common scab symptoms in the field. Phytopathology 105:1311–1317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Asok AK, Jisha MS (2006) Role of phosphate solubilizers as biofertilizer and antifungal agents. Pollut Res 25:515–518Google Scholar
  14. Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ, van Loon LC (2007) Induced systemic resistance by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 97:239–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Barnett BA, Holm DG, Koym JW, Wilson RG, Manter DK (2015) Potato yield and nutrient acquisition are supported by the soil bacteriome. Masters, Colorado State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Bationo A, Hartemink A, Lungu O, Naimi M, Okoth P, Smaling E, Thimbiano L (2012) African soils: their productivity and profitability of fertilizer use. In: Kihara J, Fatondji D, Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Tabo R, Bationo A (eds) Improving soil fertility recommendation in Africa using decision support system for agrotechnology transfer. Springer, New York, pp 19–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Berg G (2009) Plant-microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:11–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Berg G, Smalla K (2009) Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 68:1–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Berg G, Krechel A, Ditz M, Sikora RA, Ulrich A, Hallman J (2005) Endophytic and ectophytic potato-associated bacterial communities differ in structure and antagonistic function against plant pathogenic fungi. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51:215–229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bharadwaj DP, Lundquist PO, Alstrom S (2008) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal spore-associated bacteria affect mycorrhizal colonization, plant growth and potato pathogens. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2494–2501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. Microb Biotechnol 28:1327–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Borowicz VA (2001) Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter plant-pathogen relations? Ecology 82:3057–3068Google Scholar
  23. Brewer MT, Larkin RP (2005) Efficacy of several potential biocontrol organisms against Rhizoctonia solani on potato. Crop Prot 24:936–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Calvo P, Ormeño-Orrillo E, Martínez-Romero E, Zúñiga D (2010) Characterization of Bacillus isolates of Potato Rhizosphere from Andean soils of Peru and their potential PGPR characteristics. Braz J Microbiol 41:899–906CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Cirou A, Diallo S, Kurt C, Latour X, Faunre D (2007) Growth promotion of quorum-quenching bacteria in the rhizosphere of Solanum tuberosum. Environ Microbiol 9:1511–1522CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Clermont N, Lerat S, Beaulieu C (2011) Genome shuffling enhances biocontrol abilities of Streptomyces strains against two potato pathogens. J Appl Microbiol 111:671–682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clement C, Barka EA (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: Principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Biol 71:4951–4959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Daman M, Kaloori K, Gaddam B, Kausar R (2016) Plant growth promoting substances (phytohormones) produced by rhizobacterial strains isolated from the rhizosphere of medicinal plants. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res 37:130–136Google Scholar
  29. Davies JFT, Calderon CM, Huaman Z, Gomez R (2005) Influence of a flavonoid (formononetin) on mycorrhizal activity and potato crop productivity in the highlands of Peru. Sci Hortic 106:318–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. De Vrieze M, Pandey P, Bucheli TD, Varadarajan AR, Ahrens CH, Weisskopf L, Bailly A (2015) Volatile organic compounds from native potato-associated Pseudomonas as potential anti-oomycete agents. Front Microbiol 6:1295.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01295
  31. Devi AR, Kotoky R, Pandey P, Sharma GD (2016) Application of Bacillus spp. for sustainable cultivation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and the benefits. In: Islam MT (ed) Bacilli and agrobiotechnology. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, pp 185–211Google Scholar
  32. Diallo S, Crépin A, Barbey C, Orange N, Burini JF, Latour X (2011) Mechanisms and recent advances in biological control mediated through the potato rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 75:351–364.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01023.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Dighe NS, Shukla D, Kalkotwar RS, Laware RB, Bhawar SB, Gaikwad RW (2010) Nitrogenase enzyme: a review. J Pharm Sci 1:77–84Google Scholar
  34. Dragivec I, Konjevic R, Vinterhalter B, Vinterhalter D, Nescovic M (2008) The effects of IAA and tetcyclacis on tuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) shoot cultures in vitro. Plant Growth Regul 54:189–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Duffy EM, Cassells AC (2000) The effect of inoculation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) microplants with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on tuber yield and tuber size distribution. Appl Soil Ecol 15:137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fahad S, Hussain S, Bano A, Saud S, Hassan S, Shah D (2015) Potential role of phytohormones and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in abiotic stresses: consequences for changing environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2:4907–4921.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3754-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. FAO (2008) International Year of the Potato: new light on a hidden treasure. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  38. FAO (2014) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  39. FAO (2017) FAOSTAT database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  40. Farmer MJ, Li X, Feng G, Zhao B, Chatagnier O, Gianinazzi S, Gianinazi-Pearson V, van Tuinen D (2007) Molecular monitoring of field-inoculated AMF to evaluate persistence in sweet potato crops in China. Appl Soil Ecol 35:599–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gachango E, Kirk W, Schafer R, Wharton P (2012) Evaluation and comparison of biocontrol and conventional fungicides for control of postharvest potato tuber diseases. Biol Control 63:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Garbeva P, van Overbeek LS, van Vuurde JWL, Van Elsas JD (2001) Analysis of endophytic bacterial communities of potato by plating and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S rRNA based PCR fragments. Microb Ecol 41:369–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Garcia C, Roldan A, Hernandez T (2005) Ability of different plant species to promote microbiological processes in semi-arid soil. Geoderma 124:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. George H, Ed H (2011) A Summary of N, P, and K Research with tomato in Florida. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  45. Goswami D, Thakker JN, Dhandhukia PC (2016) Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review. Congent Food Agric 2:1–9Google Scholar
  46. Gouda S, Kerry RG, Das G, Paramithiotis S, Patra JK (2018) Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture. Microbiol Res 206:131–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Govindasamy V, Senthilkumar M, Magheshwaran V, Kumar U, Bose P, Sharma V, Annapurna K (2010) Bacillus and Paenibacillus spp.: potential PGPR for sustainable agriculture. In: Maheshwari DK (ed) Plant growth and health promoting bacteria. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 333–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Grover M, Ali SKZ, Sandhya V, Rasul A, Venkateswarlu B (2011) Role of microorganisms in adaptation of agriculture crops to abiotic stresses. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1231–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Guimarães SL, Neves LCRD, Bonfim-Silva EDNA, Campos DTDS (2016) Development of pigeon pea inoculated with Rhizobium isolated from cowpea trap host plants. Rev Caatinga 29:789–795.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252016v29n402rc CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gupta G, Parihar SS, Ahirwar NK, Sneni SK, Singh V (2015) Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. J Microbiol Biochem 7:96–102Google Scholar
  51. Gyaneshwar P, Naresh KG, Parekh LG, Poole PS (2002) Role of soil microorganisms in improving P nutrition of plants. Plant Soil 245:83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hanif MK, Hameed S, Imram A, Naqqash T, Shahid M, Van Elsas (2015) Isolation and characterization of a β-propeller gene containing phosphobacterium Bacillus subtilis strain KPS-11 for growth promotion of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Front Microbiol 6:583.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00583 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Hassen AI, Bopape FL, Sanger LK (2016) Microbial inoculants as agents of growth promotion and abiotic stress tolerance in plants. In: Singh D, Singh H, Prabha R (eds) Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity. Springer, New Delhi, pp 23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Henagamage AP, Seneviratne G, Abayasekera C, Kodikara KMS (2016) Screening for crop response to Diazotrophic bacteria isolated from potato rhizosphere. Ceylon J Sci 45:55–53.  https://doi.org/10.4038/cjs.v45i3.7401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Heydari S, Moghadam PR, Arab SM (2008) Hydrogen cyanide production ability by Pseudomonas fluorescence bacteria and their inhibition potential on weed. Paper presented at Competition for Resources in a changing world: New drive for rural development, Tropentag, Hohenheim. http://www.tropentag.de/2008/abstracts/full/676.pdf
  56. Hill J, Lazarovits G (2005) A mail survey of growers to estimate potato common scab prevalence and economic loss in Canada. Can J Plant Pathol 27:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hiltumen LH, Ojanperä T, Kortemaa H, Ritcher E, Lehtonen MJ, Valkonen JPT (2009) Interactions and biocontrol of pathogenic Streptomyces strains co-occurring in potato scab lesions. J Appl Microbiol 160:199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hong-Xian T, Rui-Xia W, Yin-Fan L, Xiong W, Fu-Zai S, Yun Y (2005) Isolation, screening and identification of endophytic antagonistic bacteria to potato ring rot bacteria. Chin J Agric Biotechnol 2:173178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hosni F, Asgharzadih A, Ardakani M, Hamidi A (2016) The impact of potato mini-tuber inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on tuber yield and nutrients uptake. Crop Improv 17:911–924Google Scholar
  60. Hultberg M, Bengtsson T, Liljeroth E (2010) Late blight on potato is suppressed by the biosurfactant-producing strain Pseudomonas koreensis 2.74 and its biosurfactant. BioControl 55:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hungria M, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS (2013) Co-inoculation of soybeans and common beans with Rhizobia and Azospirilla: strategies to improve sustainability. Biol Fertil Soils 49:991–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hunziker L, Bönisch D, Groenhagen U, Bailly A, Schulz S, Weisskopf L (2015) Pseudomonas strains naturally associated with potato plants produce volatiles with high potential for inhibition of Phytophthora infestans. Appl Environ Biol 81:821–830.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02999-14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Indiragandhi P, Anandham R, Madhaiyan M, Sa TM (2008) Characterization of plant growth-promoting traits of bacteria isolated from larval guts of diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Curr Microbiol 56:327–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Istifadah N, Pratama N, Taqwim S, Sunarto T (2018) Effects of bacterial endophytes from potato roots and tubers on potato cyst nematode (Globodera rostochiensis). Biodiversitas 19:47–51.  https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jha CK, Saraf M (2015) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review. E3. J Agric Res Dev 5:108–119Google Scholar
  66. Jorquera MA, Crowley DE, Marschner P, Greiner R, Fernández MT, Romero D (2011) Identification of β-propeller phytase-encoding genes in culturable Paenibacillus and Bacillus spp. from the rhizosphere of pasture plants on volcanic soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 75:163–172.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00995 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Kai M, Effmert U, Piechulla B (2016) Bacterial-plant-interactions: approaches to unravel the biological function of bacterial volatiles in the rhizosphere. Front Microbiol 7:108.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00108 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Kamal R, Gusain YS, Kumar V (2014) Interaction and symbiosis of AM fungi, Actinomycetes and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria with plants: strategies for the improvement of plants health and defense system. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3:564–585Google Scholar
  69. Khalil S, El-Noemani A (2015) Effect of biofertilizers on growth, yield, water relations, photosynthetic pigments and carbohydrates contents of Origanum vulgare L. plants grown under water stress conditions. Am-Eurasian J Sustain Agric 9:60–73Google Scholar
  70. Khan MS, Zaidi A, Wani PA (2006) Role of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture – a review. Agron Sustain Dev 27:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Klironomos JN (2003) Variation in plant response to native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84:2292–2301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Klironomos JN, Hart MM (2002) Colonization of roots by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi using different sources of inoculum. Mycorrhiza 12:181–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Kotan R, Sahin F, Demicri E, Eken C (2009) Biological control of the potato dry rot caused by Fusarium species using PGPR strains. Biol Control 50:194–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kotan R, Sahin F, Demicri E, Eken C (2011) Biological control of the potato tubers dry rot caused by Fusarium species using PGPR strains. Biol Control 59:390–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kuan KB, Othman R, Rahim KA, Shamsuddin ZH (2016) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation to enhance vegetative growth, Nitrogen fixation and nitrogen remobilization of maize under greenhouse conditions. PLoS ONE 11:1–19Google Scholar
  76. Kumar P, Dubey RC (2012) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for biocontrol of phytopathogens and yield enhancement of Phaseolus vulgaris. J Curr Perspect Appl Microbiol 1:6–38Google Scholar
  77. Kumar SS, Ram KR, Kumar DR, Panwar S, Prasad CS (2013) Biocontrol by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria against black scurf and stem canker disease of potato caused by R. solani. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect 46:487–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Larkin RP, Tavantvis S (2013) Use of biocontrol organisms and compost amendments for improved control of soilborne diseases and increased potato production. Am J Potato Res 90:261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lin C, Tsai CH, Chen PY, Wu CY, Chang YL, Yang YL, Chen YL (2018) Biological control of potato common scab by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba01. PLoS ONE 13:e0196520CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Loaces I, Ferrando L, Scavino AF (2011) Dynamics, diversity and function of endophytic siderophore-producing bacteria in rice. Microb Ecol 61:606–618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Lu G, Goneva V, Casaretto JA, Ying S, Mahmood K, Liu F, Rothstein SJ (2015) OsPIN5b modulates rice (Oryza sativa) plant architecture and yield by changing auxin-homeostasis, transport and distribution. Plant J 83:913–925.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.2015.83.issue-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Lugtenberg BJ, Dekkers L, Bloemberg GV (2001) Molecular determinants of rhizosphere colonization by Pseudomonas. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:461–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Manter DK, Delgado JA, Holm DG, Strong RA (2010) Pyrosequencing reveals a highly diverse and cultivar-specific bacterial endophyte community in potato roots. Microb Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9658-x
  84. Marathe RJ, Phatake YB, Shaikh AC, Shinde BP, Grajbhiye MH (2017) Effect of IAA produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6A (BC4) on seed germination and plant growth of Glycine max. J Exp Biol Agric Sci 5:351–358Google Scholar
  85. Marschner P, Crowley DE, Rangel Z (2011) Rhizosphere interactions between microorganisms and plants govern iron and phosphorus acquisition along the root axis–model and research methods. Soil Biol Biochem 43:883–894.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mathew A, Eberl L, Carlier AL (2014) A novel siderophore-independent strategy of iron uptake in the genus Burkholderia. Mol Biol 91:805–820.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.2014.91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Meena MK, Gupta S, Datta S (2016) Antifungal Potential of PGPR, their growth promoting activity on seed germination and seedling growth of winter wheat and genetic variability among bacterial isolates. Int J Curr Appl Sci 5:235–243Google Scholar
  88. Mhlongo MI, Piater LA, Madala NE, Labuschagne N, Dubery IA (2018) The chemistry of plant–microbe interactions in the rhizosphere and the potential for metabolomics to reveal signaling related to defense priming and induced systemic resistance. Front Plant Sci 9:112.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00112 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Mishra N, Mohan A, Mishra US (2007) Effect of bio-fertilizers on bio-chemical and macronutrients of barley seeds. Biosci Biotechnol Res 4:285–288Google Scholar
  90. Mohammadi K, Sohrabi Y (2012) Bacterial biofertilizers for sustainable crop production: a review. ARPN J Agric Biol Sci 7:307–316Google Scholar
  91. Mohammed TA, Mervat AH, Hanan HN, Gehan HY, Mohamed M (2013) Bio-preparates support the productivity of potato plants grown under desert farming conditions of north Sinai: five years of field trials. J Adv Res 5:41–48Google Scholar
  92. Murphy JF, Zehnder GW, Schuster DJ, Sikora EJ, Polston JE, Kloepper JW (2000) Plant growth promoting rhizobacterial mediated protection in tomato against tomato mottle virus. Plant Dis 84:779–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Nadeem SM, Naveed M, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN (2013) Plant-microbe interactions for sustainable agriculture: fundamentals and recent advances. In: Arora NK (ed) Plant microbe symbiosis: fundamentals and advances. Springer, New York, pp 51–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Naqqash T, Hameed S, Imram A, Hanif MK, Majeed A, Van Elsas JD (2016) Differential response of potato toward inoculation with taxonomically diverse plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Front Plant Sci 7:144.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00144 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Nivya RM (2015) A study on plant growth promoting activity of the endophytic bacteria isolated from the root nodules of Mimosa pudica. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 4:6959–6968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Normander B, Prosser JI (2000) Bacterial origin and community composition in the barley photosphere as a conditions function of habitat and presowing. Appl Environ Biol 66:4372–4377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Oerke EC (2006) Crop losses to pests. J Agric Sci 144:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ownley BH, Duffy B, Weller DM (2003) Identification and manipulation of soil properties to improve the biological control performance of phenazine-producing Pseudomonas fluorescens. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:3333–3343CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Palvo A, Leonid O, Lryna Z, Natalia K, Maria PA (2011) Endophytic bacteria enhancing growth and disease resistance of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Biol Control 56:4349Google Scholar
  100. Parmar P, Sindhu SS (2013) Potassium solubilization by rhizosphere bacteria: influence of nutritional and environmental conditions. J Microbiol Res 31:25–31Google Scholar
  101. Radzki W, Gutierrez Mañero FG, Alga E, Lucas García JL, García-Villaraco A, Ramos Salano BR (2013) Bacterial siderophores efficiently provide iron to iron starved tomato plants in hydroponics culture. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 104:321–330CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  102. Rajkumar M, Ae N, Prasad MNV, Freitas H (2010) Potential of siderophore-producing bacteria for improving heavy metal phytoextraction. Trends Biotechnol 28:142–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Ramamoorthy V, Viswanathan R, Raguchander T, Prakasam V, Samiyappan R (2001) Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in crop plants against pests and diseases. Crop Prot 20:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Ramos Salano BR, Barriuso MJ, Pereyra de la Iglesia MT, Domenech J, Gutiérrez Mañero FJ (2008) Systemic disease protection elicited by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria strains: relationship between metabolic responses, systemic disease protection, and biotic elicitors. Phytopathology 98:451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rasche F, Velvis H, Zachow C, Berg G, Van Elsas JD, Sessitsch A (2006) Impact of transgenic potatoes expressing antibacterial agents on bacterial endophytes is comparable with the effects of plant genotype, soil type and pathogen infection. J Appl Ecol 43:555–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Raza W, Yousaf S, Rajer FU (2016) Plant growth promoting activity of volatile organic compounds produced by bio-control strains. Sci Lett 4:40–43Google Scholar
  107. Reiter B, Wermbter N, Gyamfi S, Schwab H, Sessitsch A (2003) Endophytic Pseudomonas spp. populations of pathogen infected potato plants analysed by 16S rDNA- and 16S rRNAbased denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Plant Soil 257:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Reitz M, Holfmann-Hergarten S, Hallman J, Sikora RA (2001) Induction of systemic resistance in potato by rhizobacterium Rhizobium etli strain G12 is not associated with accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins and enhanced lignin biosynthesis. J Plant Dis Prot 108:11–20Google Scholar
  109. Richardson AE, Simpson RJ (2011) Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability. Plant Physiol 159:986–996Google Scholar
  110. Richardson AE, Baréa JM, McNeil AM, Prigent-Combaret C (2009) Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant Soil 321:305–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Rosen CJ, Stark JC, Porter GA (2014) Optimizing phosphorus fertilizer management in potato production. Am J Potato Res 91:145–160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-014-9371-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Sadfi N, Cherif M, Fliss I, Boudabbous A, Antoun H (2001) Evaluation of bacterial isolates from salty soils and Bacillus thuringiensis strains for the biocontrol of Fusarium dry rot of potato tubers. J Plant Pathol 83:101–118Google Scholar
  113. Saha M, Sarkar S, Sarkar B, Sharma BK, Bhattacharjee S, Tribedi P (2016) Microbial siderophores and their potential applications: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:3984–3999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Sangeeth K, Bhai RS, Srinivasan V (2012) Paenibacillus glucanolyticus, a promising potassium solubilizing bacterium isolated from black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) rhizosphere. J Spices Aromat Crops 21:118–124Google Scholar
  115. Saraf M, Pandya U, Tahkkar A (2014) Role of allelochemicals in plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for biocontrol of phytopahtogens. Microbiol Res 19:18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Schlisler DA, Slininger PJ, Kleinkopf G, Bothast DJ, Ostrowski RC (2000) Biological control of Fusarium dry rot of potato tubers under commercial storage conditions. Am J Potato Res 77:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Sessitsch A, Reiter B, Berg G (2004) Endophytic bacterial communities of field-grown potato plants and their plant growth-promoting and antagonistic abilities. Can J Microbiol 50:239–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Shah SK, Shah RP, Xu HL, Aryal UK (2007) Biofertilizers: an alternative source of nutrients for sustainable production of tree crops. J Sustain Agric 29:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Shahid M, Hameed S, Imram A, Ali S, Van Elsas JD (2012) Root colonization and growth promotion of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by phosphate solubilizing Enterobacter sp. Fs-11. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:2749–2758.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1086-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Singh RP, Jha PN (2015) Molecular identification and characterization of rhizospheric bacteria for plant growth promoting ability. Int J Curr Biotechnol 3:12–18Google Scholar
  121. Singhai PK, Sarma BK, Srivastava JS (2011) Biological management of common scab of potato through Pseudomonas species and vermicompost. Biol Control 57:105–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Smalla K, Weiland G, Buchner A, Zock A, Parzy J, Kaiser S, Roskot N, Heuer H, Berg G (2001) Bulk and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis: plant-dependent enrichment and seasonal shifts revealed. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4742–4751CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  123. Solanki MK, Singh RK, Srivastava S, Kumar S, Kashyap PL, Stivastava AK, Arora NK (2014) Isolation and characterization of siderophore producing antagonistic rhizobacteria against Rhizoctonia solani. J Basic Microbiol 54:585–597.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.v54.6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Sturz AV, Christie BR (2003) Beneficial microbial allelopathies in the root zone: the management of soil quality and plant disease with rhizobacteria. Soil Tillage Res 72:107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Sturz AV, Christie BR, Matheson BG, Arsenault WJ, Buchanan NA (1999) Endophytic bacterial communities in the epiderm of potato tubers and their potential to improve resistance to soil-borne plant pathogens. Plant Pathol 48:360–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Sureshbabu K, Amaresan N, Kumar K (2016) Amazing multiple function properties of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in the rhizosphere soil. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 5:661–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Tahir MI, Inam-ul-Haq M, Ashfaq M, Abbasi NA, Butt H, Ghazal H (2016) Screening of effective antagonists from potato rhizosphere against bacterial wilt pathogen. Int J Biosci 8:228–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Tank N, Rajendran N, Patel B, Saraf M (2012) Evaluation and biochemical characterization of a distinctive pyoverdin from a Pseudomonas isolated from chickpea rhizosphere. Braz J Microbiol:639–648Google Scholar
  129. Tewari S, Arora NK (2013) Transactions among microorganisms and plant in the composite rhizosphere habitat. In: Arora NK (ed) Plant microbe symbiosis: fundamentals and advances. Springer, New Delhi, pp 1–50Google Scholar
  130. Thamer S, Schädler M, Bonte D, Ballhorn DJ (2011) Dual benefit from a belowground symbiosis: nitrogen fixing rhizobia promote growth and defense against a specialist herbivore in a cyanogenic plant. Plant Soil 34:209–219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0635-4
  131. Thaweenut N, Hachisuka Y, Ando S, Yanagisawa S, Yoneyama T (2011) Two seasons’ study on nifH gene expression and nitrogen fixation by diazotrophic endophytes in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids): expression of nifH genes similar to those of rhizobia. Plant Soil 338:435–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Tyc O, Zweers H, de Boer W, Gardeva P (2015) Volatiles in inter-specific bacterial interactions. Front Microbiol 6:1412.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01412 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. Upadyay SK, Maurya SK, Singh DP (2012) Salinity tolerance in free living plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Indian J Sci Res 3:73–78Google Scholar
  134. Van Overbeek LS, Van Elsas JD (2008) Effects of plant genotype and growth stage on the structure of bacterial communities associated with potato (Solanum tuberosum L). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64:283–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Venieraki A, Dimou M, Pergalis P, Kefalogianni I, Chatzipavlidis I, Katinakis P (2011) The genetic diversity of culturable nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the rhizosphere of wheat. Microb Ecol 61:277–285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9747-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Vijay K, Nivedita S, Parmar Y (2017) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as growth promoters for wheat: a review. Agric Res Technol.  https://doi.org/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2017.12.555857
  137. Vosatka M, Gryndler M (2000) Response of micropropagated potatoes transplanted to peat media to post-vitro inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil bacteria. Appl Soil Ecol 15:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Wafa HM (2002) Sustainable agriculture management of plant diseases. Online J Biol Sci 2:280–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Wanner LA, Kirk W, Qu XS (2014) Field efficacy of non-pathogenic Streptomyces species against potato common scab. J Appl Microbiol 116:123–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Whipps JM (2004) Prospects and limitations for mycorrhizas in biocontrol of root pathogens. Can J Bot 82:1198–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wu F, Wang W, Ma Y, Lin Y, Ma X, An I, Feng H (2013) Prospect of beneficial microorganisms applied in potato cultivation for sustainable production. Afr J Microbiol Res 7:2150–2158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Yasin M, Munir I, Faisal M (2016) Can Bacillus spp. Enhance K+ uptake in crop species? In: Meena VS, Maurya BR, Verma JP, Meena RS (eds) Potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. Springer, India, pp 163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Youssef MMA, Eissa MFM (2014) Biofertilizers and their role in management of plant parasitic nematodes. A review. J Biotechnol Pharm Res 5:1–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association for Potato Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Department of Sustainable AgricultureBiodiversity and Ecosystems ManagementArushaTanzania
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesMoi UniversityEldoretKenya

Personalised recommendations