Advertisement

Sustainability of Popcorn-Potato Cropping System Improves Due to Organic Manure Application and Its Effect on Soil Health

  • Bharat Prakash MeenaEmail author
  • Ashok Kumar
  • B. Lal
  • Rang Lal Meena
  • A. O. Shirale
  • M. L. Dotaniya
  • Kuldeep Kumar
  • N. K. Sinha
  • S. N. Meena
  • Asha Ram
  • Priyanka Gautam
Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

For nutrient management in a cropping system, one needs to know the residual effect of organics on the succeeding crops. The work was carried out for better understanding the impact of different organic manures on the popcorn-potato cropping system which is common in many regions of India. To assess the effect of recommended N rates applied as inorganic fertilizers (IF), farmyard manure (FYM), leaf compost (LC) and vermicompost (VC) on soil health and productivity in popcorn-potato cropping system, field experiments were conducted for two consecutive years. Application of IF significantly improved crop growth and yield in popcorn but had a detrimental effect on soil health. Whole N (120 kg N ha−1) applied through FYM boosted growth and yield leading to 48.3% and 15.6% higher system productivity over control and inorganic N application, respectively. FYM equivalent to 120 kg N ha−1also significantly improved the soil fertility in terms of residual available soil N, P and K, soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil carbon stocks in popcorn-potato system. Further, the application of organic manures, particularly FYM (equivalent to 120 kg N ha−1) increased SOC over initial values by 23.8% and 35.8% during 2008–09 and 2009–10, respectively. A multiple correlation analysis (RSY.NPKSOC = 0.87; p < 0.001) showed that SOC and available forms of N, P and K significantly influenced the system yield. Regression analysis clearly indicated that system productivity was positively correlated with available soil nutrients. The application of organic manure also improved microbial populations (bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes), soil microbial carbon biomass (SMCB), dehydrogenase activity and soil bulk density (BD). The latter effect was not observed when inorganic fertilizers were applied. A FYM application rate equivalent to 120 kg N ha−1 to popcorn and 60 kg N ha−1 to potato resulted in maximum system productivity and profitability in terms of highest gross and net returns and cost:benefit ratio. The beneficial effect of applying organic manures in the cropping system was due to the improvement of soil health by addition of organic manure and easy supply of other plant nutrients.

Keywords

Farmyard manure Leaf compost Popcorn Potato Residual fertility, soil health System productivity Vermicompost 

Notes

Funding Information

This study received financial assistance from the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This paper does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abou MM, El-Bassiony M, Fawzy ZF (2006) Effect of organic manure with or without chemical fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of some varieties of Broccoli plants. J Appl Sci Res 2(10):791–798Google Scholar
  2. Allen ON (1959) Experiments in soil bacteriology, 3rd edn. Burgess publishing Co, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  3. Arulmozhiselvan K, Elayarajan M, Sathya S (2013) Effect of long term fertilization and manuring on soil fertility, yield and uptake by finger millet on Inceptisol. Madras Agric J 100(4–6):490–494Google Scholar
  4. Banik P, Sharma RC (2009) Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on the winter crops-rice cropping system in sub-humid tropics of India. Arch Agron Soil Sci 55(3):285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodman GB (1942) Nomogran for rapid calculation of soil density, water content and total porosity relationship. J Am Soc Agron 34:883–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casida J, Klein LE, Santoro T (1964) Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci 93:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dotaniya ML, Prasad D, Meena HM, Jajoria DK, Narolia GP, Pingoliya KK, Meena OP, Kumar K, Meena BP, Ram A, Das H, Chari MS, Pal S (2013) Influence of phytosiderophore on iron and zinc uptake and rhizospheric microbial activity. Afr J Microbiol Res 7(51):5781–5788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Economic survey (2017-2018) Ministry of finance, Government of India, New Delhi, pp. A34–37Google Scholar
  9. Edmendes CD (2003) The long-term effects of manures and fertilizers on soil productivity and quality: a review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 66:165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Humphreys E, Kukal SS, Christen EW, Hira GS, Singh B, Yadav S, Sharma RK (2010) Halting the groundwater decline in north-west India - which crop technologies will be winners. Adv Agron 109:155–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson ML (1967) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, p 498Google Scholar
  12. Jamwal JS (2005) Productivity and economics of maize-wheat cropping system under irrigated nutrient supply system in rainfed areas of Jammu. Indian J Agron 2(50):110–112Google Scholar
  13. Jenkinson DS, Powlson DS (1976) The effect of biological treatments on metabolism in soil A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 8:209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar A (2008) Direct and residual effect of nutrient management in maize-wheat cropping system. Indian J Agron 1(53):37–41Google Scholar
  15. Kumar A, Dhar S (2010) Evaluation of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients in maize and their residual effect on wheat under different fertility levels. Indian J Agric Sci 5(80):364–371Google Scholar
  16. Kumar V, Shivay YS (2010) Integrated nutrient management: an ideal approach for enhancing agricultural production and productivity. Indian J Fert 6(5):41–57Google Scholar
  17. Kumar A, Gautam RC, Singh R, Rana KS (2005) Growth, yield and economics of maize–wheat cropping sequences as influenced by integrated nutrient management. Indian J Agric Sci 11(75):709–711Google Scholar
  18. Kunnan P, Saravanan A, Krishnakumar S, Natarajan SK (2005) Biological properties of soil as influenced by different organic manures. Res J Agric Biol Sci 1(2):181–183Google Scholar
  19. Ladha JK, Fischer KS, Hossain M, Hobbs PR, Hardy B (2000) Improving the productivity and sustainability of rice-wheat systems of the indo-gangetic plains. In: a synthesis of NARS-IRRI partnership research, Discussion paper No. 40. International Rice Research Institute, Philippines, pp 1–31Google Scholar
  20. Luo P, Han X, WangY HM, Shi H, Ning L (2014) Influence of long-term fertilization on soil microbial biomass, dehydrogenase activity, and bacterial and fungal community structure in a brown soil of northeast China. Ann Microbiol 65:533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manna MC, Ghosh PK, Ganguly TK (2003) Comparative performance of four sources of enriched phosphocompost and inorganic fertilizer application on yield, uptake of nutrients and biological activity of soil under soybean–wheat rotation. Food Agric Environ 1(2):203–208Google Scholar
  22. Martin JP (1950) Use of acid rose Bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Sci 69:215–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meena O, Khafi HR, Shekh MA, Mehta AC, Davda BK (2007) Effect of vermicompost and nitrogen on content, uptake and yield of rabi maize. Crop Res Hisar 1–3(33):53–54Google Scholar
  24. Meena BP, Kumar A, Dotaniya ML, Jat NK, Lal B (2014) Effect of organic sources of nutrients on tuber bulking rate, grades and specific gravity of potato tubers. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci 86:47–53.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0398-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mondal SS, Sarkar B (2005) Effect of integrated nutrient management on the growth and productivity of potato. Environ Econ 235:387–391Google Scholar
  26. Nagar RK, Goud VV, Rajesh K, Kumar R (2016) Effect of organic manures and crop residue management on physical, chemical and biological properties of soil under pigeonpea based intercropping system. Int J Farm Sci 1(6):101–113Google Scholar
  27. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USSDA Circ. No.939, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Parthasarathi K, Gunasekaran G, Ranganathan LS (2006) Efficiency of mono and polycultured earthworms in humification of organic wastes. J Annals Uni Sci 42:127–134Google Scholar
  29. Purakayastha TJ, Rudrappa L, Singh D, Swarup A, Bhadraray S (2008) Long-term impact of fertilizers on soil organic carbon pools and sequestration rates in maize–wheat–cowpea cropping system. Geoderma 144:370–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramamurthy VK, Shivashankar (1996) Residual effect of organic matter and phosphorus on growth, yield and quality of maize. Indian J Agron 41:247–251Google Scholar
  31. Roy SK, Sharma RC, Trehan SP (2001) Integrated nutrient management by using farmyard manure and fertilizers in potato–sunflower–rice rotation. Punjab. J Agric Sci 137:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanwal SK, Lakminarayana K, Yadav RK, Rai N, Yadav DS, Mousumi B (2007) Effect of organic manures on soil fertility, growth, physiology, yield and quality of turmeric. Indian J Hort 64(4):444–449Google Scholar
  33. Sarangthem I, Misra ADD, Chakraborty Y (2011) Cabbage productivity, nutrient uptake and soil fertility as affected by organic and biosources. Agric Sci Dig 4(31):260Google Scholar
  34. Shirale AO, Kharche VK, Zadode RS, Meena BP, Rajendiran S (2017) Soil biological properties and carbon dynamics subsequent to organic amendments addition in sodic black soils. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63:2023–2034.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1322194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh JP, Trehan SP (1998) Balanced fertilization to increase the yield of potato. Proceeding of the IPI–PRII–PAU Work shop on: Balanced fertilization in Punjab Agriculture, 1997 Dec. 15–16, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India pp129–139Google Scholar
  36. Singh RN, Sutaliya R, Ghatak R, Sarangi SK (2003) Effect of higher application of nitrogen and potassium over recommended level on growth, yield and yield attributes of late sown winter maize. Crop Res 1(26):71–74Google Scholar
  37. Singh MK, Singh RN, Yadav MK, Singh VK (2010) Integrated nutrient management for higher yield, quality and profitability of baby corn. Indian J Agron 2(55):100–104Google Scholar
  38. Singh RJ, Ghosh BN, Sharma NK, Patra S, Dadhwal KS, Meena VS, Deshwal JS, Mishra PK (2017) Effect of seven years of nutrient supplementation through organic and inorganic sources on productivity soil and water conservation, and soil fertility changes of maize-wheat rotation in north-western Indian Himalayas. Agric Ecosyst Environ 249:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for assessment of available nitrogen in rice soils. Curr Sci 25:259–260Google Scholar
  40. Venkatesh MS, Hazra KK, Ghosh PK, Khuswah BL, Ganeshamurthy AN, Ali M, Singh J, Mathur RS (2017) Long-term effect of crop rotation and nutrient management on soil–plant nutrient cycling and nutrient budgeting in Indo–Gangetic plains of India. Arch Agron Soil Sci 14(63):2007–2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Verma A, Nepalia V, Kanthaliya PC (2006) Effect of integrated nutrient supply on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by maize-wheat cropping system. Indian J Agro 1(15):3–5Google Scholar
  42. Walkley AJ, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjaneff method for determination of soil organic matter and a proposed medication of chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zaman A, Sarkar A, Sarkar S, Dev WP (2011) Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on productivity, specific gravity and processing quality of potato. Indian J Agric Sci 12(81):1137–1142Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association for Potato Research 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bharat Prakash Meena
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ashok Kumar
    • 2
  • B. Lal
    • 3
  • Rang Lal Meena
    • 3
  • A. O. Shirale
    • 1
  • M. L. Dotaniya
    • 1
  • Kuldeep Kumar
    • 4
  • N. K. Sinha
    • 1
  • S. N. Meena
    • 5
  • Asha Ram
    • 6
  • Priyanka Gautam
    • 7
  1. 1.ICAR–Indian Institute of Soil ScienceBhopalIndia
  2. 2.ICAR–National Agricultural Science FundNew DelhiIndia
  3. 3.ICAR–Central Sheep and Wool Research InstituteAvikanagarIndia
  4. 4.ICAR– Indian Institute of Soil and Water ConservationRegional Station CentreKotaIndia
  5. 5.Agriculture University, Kota Agriculture Research StationKotaIndia
  6. 6.ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research InstituteJhansiIndia
  7. 7.ICAR-National Research Centre on CamelBikanerIndia

Personalised recommendations