Fusarium spp. Causing Dry Rot on Potatoes in Norway and Development of a Real-Time PCR Method for Detection of Fusarium coeruleum
- 340 Downloads
The prevalence of Fusarium dry rot in potatoes produced in Norway was investigated in a survey for three consecutive years in the period 2010 to 2012. A total of 238 samples (comprising 23,800 tubers) were collected, representing different cultivars and production regions in Norway. Fusarium spp. were detected in 47% of the samples, with one to three species per sample. In total, 718 isolates of Fusarium spp. were recovered and identified to seven species. The most commonly isolated species was Fusarium coeruleum, comprising 59.6% of the total Fusarium isolates and found in 17.2% of the collected samples, followed by Fusarium avenaceum (27.2% of the isolates and found in 27.7% of the samples). Fusarium sambucinum was the third most prevalent species (6.4% in 8.8% of the samples) and Fusarium culmorum the fourth (5.2% in 6.3% of the samples). Less prevalent species included Fusarium cerealis, Fusarium graminearum, and Fusarium equiseti (<1% in 0.4 to 1.3% of the samples). F. coeruleum was the most prevalent species in northern and southwestern Norway, whereas F. avenaceum was dominating in eastern Norway. The potato cultivars Berber and Rutt were susceptible to all Fusarium spp. A new TaqMan real-time PCR assay specific for F. coeruleum was developed, which successfully identified Norwegian isolates. This and other previously developed real-time PCR assays targeting different Fusarium species were evaluated for their ability to detect latent infections in potatoes at harvest. This study provides new information on the current occurrence of different Fusarium species causing Fusarium dry rot in potatoes in Europe including areas far into the arctic in the north of Norway.
KeywordsFusarium Molecular identification cultivars Potato dry rot Regions
We would like to thank the agronomists and company representatives who supplied the samples investigated in this survey. We would also like to thank Ragnhild Hustveit, Julien Gomez, and Robert Nybråten for technical assistance. This research was funded by the Foundation for Research Levy on Agricultural Products and the Agricultural Agreement Research Fund, together with Norwegian food industry partners.
- Bernhoft A, Eriksen GS, Sundheim L, Berntssen M, Brantsæter AL, Brodal G, Fæste CK, Hofgaard IS, Rafoss T, Sivertsen T, Tronsmo AM (2013) Risk assessment of mycotoxins in cereal grain in Norway, Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet (Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety). www.vkm.no/dav/eee04d10c4.pdf. Accessed 01 May 2016
- Bjor T (1978) Lagringsråter på potet -årsaker og forekomst, VI. Informasjonsmøte i plantevern Ås, 23.-24. januar 1978. pp. D1–D4Google Scholar
- Boyd AEW (1972) Potato storage diseases Review of. Plant Pathol 51:305–308Google Scholar
- Gerlach W, Nirenberg H (1982) The Genus Fusarium - a Pictorial Atlas. Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land-und Forstwirtschaft (Berlin-Dahlem) 209:1–405Google Scholar
- Møllerhagen P (2014) Sorter og sortsprøving i potet 2013. Bioforsk FOKUS 9:292–310Google Scholar
- Olofsson J (1976) Vigtiga sjukdomar i potatislager. Vaxtskyddsnotiser 40:40–55Google Scholar
- Secor GA, Salas B (2001) Fusarium dry rot and Fusarium wilt. In: Stevenson WR, Loria R, Franc GD, Weingartner DP (eds) Compendium of potato diseases, 2nd edn. APS Press, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
- Seppänen E (1983) Fusariums of the potato in Finland VIII. Occurrence of the pathogens causing potato dry rot and gangrene. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae 22:115–119Google Scholar
- White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar