Advertisement

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 80, Issue 10, pp 2761–2786 | Cite as

The Persistence of a Local Dialect When a National Standard Language is Present: An Evolutionary Dynamics Model of Cultural Diversity

  • Cinthia M. Tanaka
  • Joung-Hun Lee
  • Yoh Iwasa
Original Article

Abstract

In recent decades, cultural diversity loss has been a growing issue, which can be analyzed mathematically through the use of the formalism of the theory of cultural evolution. We here study the evolutionary dynamics of dialects in order to find the key processes for mitigating the loss of language diversity. We define dialects as different speech systems of the same language which are mutually intelligible. Specifically, we focus on the survival of a local dialect when competing against a national standard language, with the latter giving an advantage in occupational and economic contexts. We assume individuals may use different dialects, in response to two different situations: they may use the national language in a formal workplace, while they may use a local dialect in family or close friend meetings. We consider the choice of a dialect is guided by two forces: (1) differential attractiveness of the local/standard language and (2) willingness to speak the same dialect (conformity factor) inside a private group. We found that the evolutionary outcome critically depends on how conformity works. Conformity enhances the effect of differential attractiveness between the local dialect and the standard language if conformity works favoring only those states in which all speakers use the same dialect (unanimity pressure model), but conformity has no effect at all if it works in proportion to the fraction among peers (peer pressure model).

Keywords

Language evolution Cultural evolution Standard language Dialect preservation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mayuko Nakamaru, Hisashi Ohtsuki and the members of the Kyushu University Mathematical Biology Laboratory for their comments and suggestions. This work was carried out during C.M.T. visit to Kyushu University, Japan, supported by Kyushu University, under the program Kyushu University Friendship Scholarship, and CAPES. J.H.L. received financial support from Leading Graduate School Program for Decision Science to Kyushu University of MEXT, Japan. JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Basic Scientific Research (B) No. 15H04423 to Y.I. is also acknowledged.

References

  1. Abrams DM, Strogatz SH (2003) Linguistics: modelling the dynamics of language death. Nature 424(6951):900-900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Advani A, Reich B (2015) Melting pot or salad bowl: the formation of heterogeneous communities. Technical report, IFS Working PapersGoogle Scholar
  3. Aizawa M (2012) Research on present-day dialect consciousness: nationalwide survery in 2010 and its statistical analysis (in Japanese). NINJAL Project Rev 3(1):26–37Google Scholar
  4. Amano T, Sandel B, Eager H, Bulteau E, Svenning JC, Dalsgaard B, Rahbek C, Davies RG, Sutherland WJ (2014) Global distribution and drivers of language extinction risk. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 281(1793):20141574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asch SE (1955) Opinions and social pressure. Sci Am 193(5):31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asch SE (1956) Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychol Monogr Gen Appl 70(9):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Axelrod R (1997) The dissemination of culture a model with local convergence and global polarization. J Confl Resolut 41(2):203–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bai J (1994) Language attitude and the spread of standard Chinese in China. Lang Probl Lang Plan 18(2):128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1988) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution: a quantitative approach, vol 16. Princeton University Press, PrincetonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Clingingsmith D (2017) Are the world’s languages consolidating? The dynamics and distribution of language populations. Econ J 127(599):143–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crystal D (2007) How language works. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Haugen E (1966) Dialect, language, nation. Am Anthropol 68(4):922–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Inoue F (1991) New dialect and standard language. Style shift in tokyo. Area Cult Stud 42:49–68Google Scholar
  15. Inoue F (1993) The significance of new dialects. Dialectol Geolinguist 1:3–27Google Scholar
  16. Minett JW, Wang WS (2008) Modelling endangered languages: the effects of bilingualism and social structure. Lingua 118(1):19–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mira J, Seoane LF, Nieto JJ (2011) The importance of interlinguistic similarity and stable bilingualism when two languages compete. New J Phys 13(3):033007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moseley C (2010) Atlas of the world’s languages in danger. http://www.unesco.org/culture/en/endangeredlanguages/atlas. Accessed 26 Aug 2016
  19. Neary PR et al (2012) Competing conventions. Games Econ Behav 76(1):301–328MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nowak MA, Krakauer DC (1999) The evolution of language. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96(14):8028–8033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sekiguchi T, Nakamaru M (2011) How inconsistency between attitude and behavior persists through cultural transmission. J Theor Biol 271(1):124–135MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sekiguchi T, Nakamaru M (2014) How intergenerational interaction affects attitude-behavior inconsistency. J Theor Biol 346:54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shibatani M (1990) The languages of Japan. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Szathmáry E, Smith JM (1995) The major transitions in evolution. WH Freeman Spektrum, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Tang C (2014) The use of Chinese dialects: increasing or decreasing? In: Caspers J, Chen Y, Heeren W, Pacilly J, Schiller NO & van Zanten E (eds) Above and beyond the segments: experimental linguistics and phonetics. John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp 302–310Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsInstitute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Center for Decision ScienceKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Faculty of SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations