Advertisement

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 81, Issue 3, pp 919–935 | Cite as

The “Memory” Effect in a Chain of Biochemical Reactions with a Positive Feedback is Enhanced by Substrate Saturation Described by Michaelis–Menten Kinetics

  • Pranas Katauskis
  • Feliksas Ivanauskas
  • Aidas AlaburdaEmail author
Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

Information in the brain is stored in a form of an altered synaptic strength between neurons. The long-term potentiation (LTP), a phenomenon when a short-term increase in neural activity is transformed into a long-lasting increase in strengths of synaptic connectivity, provides an experimental substrate of memory. Using reaction–diffusion equations, we established an LTP model, describing the dynamics of glutamate (Glu), calcium (Ca2+) and nitric oxide (NO) in response to the stimulus—a presynaptic action potential. NO can diffuse to the presynaptic terminal and facilitate the Glu release forming a positive feedback loop. Therefore, the LTP can be considered as a chain of biochemical reactions with a positive feedback loop. In this study, we investigated numerically the role of interactions in a chain of biochemical reactions with a positive feedback on the bistable behavior or memory. We conclude that the positive feedback system with the linear interaction between substances does not exhibit a bistable behavior. However, introduction of substrate saturation described by Michaelis–Menten kinetics for NO decay can lead to an increase in synaptic strength lasting for dozens or even hundreds of seconds. Our finding extends a possible role of NO in LTP: a short high intensity stimulus is “memorized” as a long-lasting elevation of NO concentration.

Keywords

Memory Positive feedback Modeling Long-term potentiation Reaction–diffusion equations Michaelis–Menten kinetics 

References

  1. Baronas R, Ivanauskas F, Kulys J (2010) The difference schemes for the reaction–diffusion equations. Mathematical modeling of biosensors. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 293–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blitzer RD (2005) Long-term potentiation: mechanisms of induction and maintenance. Sci Signal 2005:tr26Google Scholar
  3. Bon CL, Garthwaite J (2001) Nitric oxide-induced potentiation of CA1 hippocampal synaptic transmission during baseline stimulation is strictly frequency-dependent. Neuropharmacology 40:501–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley SA, Steinert JR (2016) Nitric oxide-mediated posttranslational modifications: impacts at the synapse. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016:5681036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronner F (2001) Extracellular and intracellular regulation of calcium homeostasis. Sci World J 1:919–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castillo PE (2012) Presynaptic LTP and LTD of excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4(2):a005728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chater TE, Goda Y (2014) The role of AMPA receptors in postsynaptic mechanisms of synaptic plasticity. Front Cell Neurosci 8:401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clements JD, Lester RA, Tong G, Jahr CE, Westbrook GL (1992) The time course of glutamate in the synaptic cleft. Science 258:1498–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frade JG, Barbosa RM, Laranjinha J (2009) Stimulation of NMDA and AMPA glutamate receptors elicits distinct concentration dynamics of nitric oxide in rat hippocampal slices. Hippocampus 19:603–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garthwaite J (2008) Concepts of neural nitric oxide-mediated transmission. Eur J Neurosci 27:2783–2802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garthwaite J (2016) From synaptically localized to volume transmission by nitric oxide. J Physiol 594:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garthwaite J, Charles SL, Chess-Williams R (1988) Endothelium-derived relaxing factor release on activation of NMDA receptors suggests role as intercellular messenger in the brain. Nature 336:385–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haley JE, Wilcox GL, Chapman PF (1992) The role of nitric oxide in hippocampal long-term potentiation. Neuron 8:211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall CN, Garthwaite J (2009) What is the real physiological NO concentration in vivo? Nitric Oxide 21:92–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardingham N, Dachtler J, Fox K (2013) The role of nitric oxide in pre-synaptic plasticity and homeostasis. Front Cell Neurosci 7:190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herring BE, Nicoll RA (2016) Long-term potentiation: from CaMKII to AMPA receptor trafficking. Annu Rev Physiol 78:351–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hopper RA, Garthwaite J (2006) Tonic and phasic nitric oxide signals in hippocampal long-term potentiation. J Neurosci 26:11513–11521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang EP (1997) Synaptic plasticity: a role for nitric oxide in LTP. Curr Biol 7:R141–R143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Izaki Y, Takita M, Nomura M, Akema T (2003) Differences between paired-pulse facilitation and long-term potentiation in the dorsal and ventral hippocampal CA1-prefrontal pathways of rats. Brain Res 992:142–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim HY, Jun J, Wang J, Bittar A, Chung K, Chung JM (2015) Induction of long-term potentiation and long-term depression is cell-type specific in the spinal cord. Pain 156:618–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kovalchuk Y, Eilers J, Lisman J, Konnerth A (2000) NMDA receptor-mediated subthreshold Ca2+ signals in spines of hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 20:1791–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laranjinha J, Santos RM, Lourenço CF, Ledo A, Barbosa RM (2012) Nitric oxide signaling in the brain: translation of dynamics into respiration control and neurovascular coupling. Ann NY Acad Sci 1259:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lomo T (1966) Frequency potentiation of excitatory synaptic activity in the dentate area of the hippocampal formation. Acta Physiol Scand 68(277):128Google Scholar
  24. Lüscher C, Malenka RC (2012) NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation and long-term depression (LTP/LTD). Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4(6):a005710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Manninen T, Hituri K, Kotaleski JH, Blackwell KT, Linne ML (2010) Postsynaptic signal transduction models for long-term potentiation and depression. Front Comput Neurosci 4:152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayford M, Siegelbaum SA, Kandel ER (2012) Synapses and memory storage. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4(6):a005751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mazzoni A, Broccard FD, Garcia-Perez E, Bonifazi P, Ruaro ME, Torre V (2007) On the dynamics of the spontaneous activity in neuronal networks. PLoS ONE 2:e439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCormick DA (2005) Neuronal networks: flip-flops in the brain. Curr Biol 15:R294–R296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mincheva M, Craciun G (2008) Multigraph conditions for multistability, oscillations and pattern formation in biochemical reaction networks. Proc IEEE 96:1281–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muñoz FJ, Godoy JA, Cerpa W, Poblete IM, Huidobro-Toro JP, Inestrosa NC (2014) Wnt-5a increases NO and modulates NMDA receptor in rat hippocampal neurons. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 444:189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neitz A, Mergia E, Imbrosci B, Petrasch-Parwez E, Eysel UT, Koesling D, Mittmann T (2014) Postsynaptic NO/cGMP increases NMDA receptor currents via hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels in the hippocampus. Cereb Cortex 24(7):1923–1936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parodi J, Montecinos-Oliva C, Varas R, Alfaro IE, Serrano FG, Varas-Godoy M, Muñoz FJ, Cerpa W, Godoy JA, Inestrosa NC (2015) Wnt5a inhibits K(+) currents in hippocampal synapses through nitric oxide production. Mol Cell Neurosci 68:314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Penn Y, Segal M, Moses E (2016) Network synchronization in hippocampal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:3341–3346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pigott BM, Garthwaite J (2016) Nitric oxide is required for L-Type Ca(2+) channel-dependent long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Front Synaptic Neurosci 8:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prinz AA, Bucher D, Marder E (2004) Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters. Nat Neurosci 7(12):1345–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sala F, Hernández-Cruz A (1990) Calcium diffusion modeling in a spherical neuron. Relevance of buffering properties. Biophys J 57:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Samarskii AA (2001) The theory of difference schemes. CRC Press, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Susswein AJ, Katzoff A, Miller N, Hurwitz I (2004) Nitric oxide and memory. The Neuroscientist 10:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ventriglia F, Di Maio V (2000) A Brownian model of glutamate diffusion in excitatory synapses of hippocampus. Biosystems 58:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Volgushev M, Balaban P, Chistiakova M, Eysel UT (2000) Retrograde signalling with nitric oxide at neocortical synapses. Eur J Neurosci 12:4255–4267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang Q, Mergia E, Koesling D, Mittmann T (2017) Nitric oxide/cGMP signaling via guanylyl cyclase isoform 1 modulates glutamate and GABA release in somatosensory cortex of mice. Neuroscience 360:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zacharia IG, Deen WM (2005) Diffusivity and solubility of nitric oxide in water and saline. Ann Biomed Eng 33:214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and InformaticsVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
  2. 2.Institute of Biosciences, Life Sciences CenterVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations