Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automated Robust Image Segmentation: Level Set Method Using Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Application to Brain MRI

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We address the problem of fully automated region discovery and robust image segmentation by devising a new deformable model based on the level set method (LSM) and the probabilistic nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF). We describe the use of NMF to calculate the number of distinct regions in the image and to derive the local distribution of the regions, which is incorporated into the energy functional of the LSM. The results demonstrate that our NMF–LSM method is superior to other approaches when applied to synthetic binary and gray-scale images and to clinical magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the human brain with and without a malignant brain tumor, glioblastoma multiforme. In particular, the NMF–LSM method is fully automated, highly accurate, less sensitive to the initial selection of the contour(s) or initial conditions, more robust to noise and model parameters, and able to detect as small distinct regions as desired. These advantages stem from the fact that the proposed method relies on histogram information instead of intensity values and does not introduce nuisance model parameters. These properties provide a general approach for automated robust region discovery and segmentation in heterogeneous images. Compared with the retrospective radiological diagnoses of two patients with non-enhancing grade 2 and 3 oligodendroglioma, the NMF–LSM detects earlier progression times and appears suitable for monitoring tumor response. The NMF–LSM method fills an important need of automated segmentation of clinical MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babalola KO, Patenaude B, Aljabar P, Schnabel J, Kennedy D, Crum W, Smith S, Cootes TF, Jenkinson M, Rueckert D (2008) Comparison and evaluation of segmentation techniques for subcortical structures in brain MRI. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 5241:409–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayar B, Bouaynaya N, Shterenberg R (2014) Probabilistic non-negative matrix factorization: theory and application to microarray data analysis. J Bioinform Comput Biol 12:25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G (1997) Geodesic active contours. Int J Comput Vis 22(1):61–79

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chan T, Vese L (2001) Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Image Process 10:266–277

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhang J, Mishra A, Yang J (2011) Image segmentation and bias correction via an improved level set method. Neurocomputing 74(17):3520–3530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chena Y, Zhanga J, Macioneb J (2009) An improved level set method for brain mr images segmentation and bias correction. Comput Med Imaging Graph 33:510–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang KS, Tzeng HL, Chen S, Wu J, Chen TJ (2006) Fuzzy c-means clustering with spatial information for image segmentation. Comput Med Imaging Graph 30:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen LD, Cohen I (1993) Finite-element methods for active contour models and balloons for 2-D and 3-D images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 15(11):1131–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith C, Poline JB, Heather JD, Frackowiak RS (1995) Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp 2:165–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Lorenzo D, Francis S, Narayanan S, Arnold DL, Collins DL (2013) Review of automatic segmentation methods of multiple sclerosis white matter lesions on conventional magnetic resonance imaging. Med Image Anal 17(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain S, Sima DM, Ribbens A, Cambron M, Maertens A, Van Hecke W, De Mey J, Barkhof F, Steenwijk MD, Daams M, Maes F, Van Huffel S, Vrenken H, Smeets D (2015) Automatic segmentation and volumetry of multiple sclerosis brain lesions from MR images. Neuroimage Clin 8:367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D (1987) Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vis 1:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klauschen F, Goldman A, Barra V, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Lundervold A (2009) Evaluation of automated brain MR image segmentation and volumetry methods. Hum Brain Mapp 30(4):1310–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Kao CY, Gore JC, Ding Z (2008) Minimization of region-scalable fitting energy for image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process 17(10):1940–1949

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Xu C, Gui C, Fox MD (2010) Distance regularized level set evolution and its application to image segmentation. IEEE Trans Image Process 19:3242–3254

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Huang R, Ding Z, Gatenby JC, Metaxas DN, Gore JC (2011) A level set method for image segmentation in the presence of intensity inhomogeneities with application to MRI. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(7):2007–2016

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pagnozzi AM, Gal Y, Boyd RN, Fiori S, Fripp J, Rose S, Dowson N (2015) The need for improved brain lesion segmentation techniques for children with cerebral palsy: a review. Int J Dev Neurosci 47:229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-berg H, Bannister PR, Luca MD, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, Stefano ND, Brady JM, Matthews PM (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 23:208–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai A, Yezzi A, Willsky AS (2001) Curve evolution implementation of the Mumford–Shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation and magnification. IEEE Trans Image Process 10:1169–1186

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Valverde S, Oliver A, Diez Y, Cabezas M, Vilanova JC, Ramio-Torrenta L, Rovira A, Llado X (2015) Evaluating the effects of white matter multiple sclerosis lesions on the volume estimation of 6 brain tissue segmentation methods. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(6):1109–1115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vovk U, Pernus F, Likar B (2007) A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26:405–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, He L, Mishra A, Li C (2009) Active contours driven by local Gaussian distribution fitting energy. Signal Process 89(12):2435–2447

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Award Number ACI-1429467. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan M. Fathallah-Shaykh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dera, D., Bouaynaya, N. & Fathallah-Shaykh, H.M. Automated Robust Image Segmentation: Level Set Method Using Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Application to Brain MRI. Bull Math Biol 78, 1450–1476 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-016-0190-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-016-0190-0

Keywords

Navigation