Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 77, Issue 6, pp 927–952 | Cite as

Modelling Dominance Hierarchies Under Winner and Loser Effects

Original Article

Abstract

Animals that live in groups commonly form themselves into dominance hierarchies which are used to allocate important resources such as access to mating opportunities and food. In this paper, we develop a model of dominance hierarchy formation based upon the concept of winner and loser effects using a simulation-based model and consider the linearity of our hierarchy using existing and new statistical measures. Two models are analysed: when each individual in a group does not know the real ability of their opponents to win a fight and when they can estimate their opponents’ ability every time they fight. This estimation may be accurate or fall within an error bound. For both models, we investigate if we can achieve hierarchy linearity, and if so, when it is established. We are particularly interested in the question of how many fights are necessary to establish a dominance hierarchy.

Keywords

Dominance hierarchy Winner and loser effects Linearity  Resource holding power Kolmogorov distance 

References

  1. Addison WE, Simmel EC (1980) The relationship between dominance and leadership in a flock of ewes. Bull Psychonom Soc 15(5):303–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcock J (1993) Animal behavior: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  3. Allee WC (1951) Cooperation among animals, with human implications: a revised and amplified edition of the social life of animals. Henry Schuman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Appleby MC (1983) The probability of linearity in hierarchies. Anim Behav 31(2):600–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakker TH, Bruijn E, Sevenster P (1989) Asymmetrical effects of prior winning and losing on dominance in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ethology 82(3):224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balakrishnan R, Ranganathan K (2012) A textbook of graph theory. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Beacham JL (1988) The relative importance of body size and aggressive experience as determinants of dominance in pumpkinseed sunfish, lepomis gibbosus. Anim Behav 36(2):621–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beacham JL (2003) Models of dominance hierarchy formation: effects of prior experience and intrinsic traits. Behaviour 140(10):1275–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergman DA, Kozlowski CP, McIntyre JC, Huber R, Daws AG (2003) Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, orconectes rusticus. Behaviour 140:805–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL (1999) Dominance orders in animal societies: the self-organization hypothesis revisited. Bull Math Biol 61(4):727–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Broom M (2002) A unified model of dominance hierarchy formation and maintenance. J Theor Biol 219(1):63–72MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Broom M, Cannings C (2002) Modelling dominance hierarchy formation as a multi-player game. J Theor Biol 219(3):397–413MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown JL, Brown ER, Sedransk J, Ritter SH (1997) Dominance, age, and reproductive success in a complex society: a long-term study of the mexican jay. Auk 114:279–286Google Scholar
  14. de Villiers MS, Richardson PRK, van Jaarsveld AS (2003) Patterns of coalition formation and spatial association in a social carnivore, the african wild dog (Lycaon pictus). J Zool 260(04):377–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Vries H (1995) An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships. Anim Behav 50(5):1375–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dugatkin LA (1995) Formalizing allee’s ideas on dominance hierarchies: an intrademic selection model. Am Nat 146:154–160Google Scholar
  17. Dugatkin LA (1997) Winner and loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies. Behav Ecol 8(6):583–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dugatkin LA, Dugatkin AD (2007) Extrinsic effects, estimating opponents’ RHP, and the structure of dominance hierarchies. Biol Lett 3(6):614–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Early R, Dugatkin LA (2010) Behavior in groups. In: Westneat D, Fox C (eds) Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology. Oxford University Press, pp 285–307Google Scholar
  20. Fero K, Simon JL, Jourdie V, Moore PA (2007) Consequences of social dominance on crayfish resource use. Behaviour 144:61–82Google Scholar
  21. Frank LG (1986) Social organization of the spotted hyaena crocuta crocuta. II. Dominance and reproduction. Anim Behav 34(5):1510–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goessmann C, Hemelrijk C, Huber R (2000) The formation and maintenance of crayfish hierarchies: behavioral and self-structuring properties. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 48(6):418–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hand JL (1986) Resolution of social conflicts: dominance, egalitarianism, spheres of dominance, and game theory. Q Rev Biol 61:201–220Google Scholar
  24. Hemelrijk CK (2000) Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure. Anim Behav 59(5):1035–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoglund J, Alatalo RV (1995) Leks. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hsu Y, Earley RL, Wolf LL (2006) Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev 81(1):33–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hsu Y, Lee IH, Lu CK (2009) Prior contest information: mechanisms underlying winner and loser effects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63(9):1247–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kendall MG (1962) Rank correlation methods. Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Klopfer PH (1973) Behavioral aspects of ecology. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  30. Kokko H, Lindström J, Alatalo RV, Rintamäki PT (1998) Queuing for territory positions in the lekking black grouse (Tetrao tetrix). Behav Ecol 9(4):376–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Landau HG (1951a) On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. effect of inherent characteristics. Bull Math Biophys 13(1):1–19MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Landau HG (1951b) On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: II. Some effects of possible social factors. Bull Math Biophys 13(4):245–262MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindquist WB, Chase ID (2009) Data-based analysis of winner-loser models of hierarchy formation in animals. Bull Math Biol 71(3):556–584MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Marsden HM (1968) Agonistic behaviour of young rhesus monkeys after changes induced in social rank of their mothers. Anim Behav 16(1):38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McDonald DB, Shizuka D (2013) Comparative transitive and temporal orderliness in dominance networks. Behav Ecol 24:511–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mesterton-Gibbons M, Dugatkin LA (1995) Toward a theory of dominance hierarchies: effects of assessment, group size, and variation in fighting ability. Behav Ecol 6(4):416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Molet M, Van Baalen M, Monnin T (2005) Dominance hierarchies reduce the number of hopeful reproductives in polygynous queenless ants. Insectes Soc 52(3):247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Monnin T, Peeters C (1999) Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant. Behav Ecol 10(3):323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47(1):223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rutte C, Taborsky M, Brinkhof MWG (2006) What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends Ecol Evol 21(1):16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schjelderup-Ebbe T (1922) Beiträge zur sozialpsychologie des haushuhns. Z PsycholGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmid F, Schmidt A (2006) Nonparametric estimation of the coefficient of overlapping-theory and empirical application. Comput Stat Data Anal 50(6):1583–1596MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Schuett GW (1997) Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads. Anim Behav 54(1):213–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shimoji H, Abe MS, Tsuji K, Masuda N (2014) Global network structure of dominance hierarchy of ant workers. J R Soc Interface 11(99):20140599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shizuka D, McDonald DB (2012) A social network perspective on measurements of dominance hierarchies. Anim Behav 83(4):925–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Silk JB, Alberts SC, Altmann J (2004) Patterns of coalition formation by adult female baboons in Amboseli, Kenya. Anim Behav 67(3):573–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsCity University LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations