Evolution of Density-Dependent Cooperation
- 319 Downloads
Cooperation is surprisingly common in life despite of its vulnerability to selfish cheating, i.e. defecting. Defectors do not contribute to common resources but take the advantage of cooperators’ investments. Therefore, the emergence and maintenance of cooperation have been considered irrational phenomena. In this study, we focus on plastic, quantitative cooperation behaviour, especially on its evolution. We assume that individuals are capable to sense the population density in their neighbourhood and adjust their real-valued investments on public goods based on that information. The ecological setting is described with stochastic demographic events, e.g. birth and death, occurring at individual level. Individuals form small populations, which further constitute a structured metapopulation. For evolutionary investigations, we apply the adaptive dynamics framework. The cost of cooperative investment is incorporated into the model in two ways, by decreasing the birth rate or by increasing the death rate. In the first case, density-dependent cooperation evolves to be a decreasing function of population size as expected. In the latter case, however, the density-dependent cooperative investment can have a qualitatively different form as it may evolve to be highest in intermediate-sized populations. Indeed, we emphasize that some details in modelling may have a significant impact on the results obtained.
KeywordsAdaptive dynamics Structured metapopulation Public-goods cooperation
This study was funded by the Academy of Finland, project number 128323 to K.P., and by the Kone Foundation, a grant to A.S. The authors wish to thank Samuel Alizon and anonymous reviewers for comments.
- Ferrière R. (2000) Adaptive responses to environmental threats: evolutionary suicide, insurance, and rescue. Options Spring, 2000, IIASA. Laxenburg, Austria, pp 12–16Google Scholar
- Leimar O (2009) Multidimensional convergence stability. Evol Ecol Res 11(2):191–208Google Scholar
- Maynard Smith J (1976) Evolution and the theory of games. Am Sci 64:41–45Google Scholar
- Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Metz JAJ, Geritz SAH, Meszéna G, Jacobs FJA, van Heerwaarden JS (1996) Adaptive dynamics, a geometrical study of the consequenses of nearly faithful reproduction. In: Van Strien SJ, Verduyn Lunel SM (eds) Stochastic and spatial structures of dynamical systems. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 183–231Google Scholar
- West SA, Griffin AS, Gardner A, Diggie SP (2006) Social evolution theory for microorganism. Nature 4:597–607Google Scholar