Choosing an Appropriate Modelling Framework for Analysing Multispecies Co-culture Cell Biology Experiments
- 255 Downloads
In vitro cell biology assays play a crucial role in informing our understanding of the migratory, proliferative and invasive properties of many cell types in different biological contexts. While mono-culture assays involve the study of a population of cells composed of a single cell type, co-culture assays study a population of cells composed of multiple cell types (or subpopulations of cells). Such co-culture assays can provide more realistic insights into many biological processes including tissue repair, tissue regeneration and malignant spreading. Typically, system parameters, such as motility and proliferation rates, are estimated by calibrating a mathematical or computational model to the observed experimental data. However, parameter estimates can be highly sensitive to the choice of model and modelling framework. This observation motivates us to consider the fundamental question of how we can best choose a model to facilitate accurate parameter estimation for a particular assay. In this work we describe three mathematical models of mono-culture and co-culture assays that include different levels of spatial detail. We study various spatial summary statistics to explore if they can be used to distinguish between the suitability of each model over a range of parameter space. Our results for mono-culture experiments are promising, in that we suggest two spatial statistics that can be used to direct model choice. However, co-culture experiments are far more challenging: we show that these same spatial statistics which provide useful insight into mono-culture systems are insufficient for co-culture systems. Therefore, we conclude that great care ought to be exercised when estimating the parameters of co-culture assays.
KeywordsCell migration Cell proliferation Monolayer development Multispecies Co-culture assay
We appreciate experimental support from Parvathi Haridas. This research is supported by the Australian Research Council (FT130100148) and the 2011 International Exchange Scheme funded by the Royal Society.
- Chapra SC, Canale RP (1998) Numerical methods for engineers. McGraw Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- Dieckmann U, Law R (1999) Relaxation projections and the method of moments. In: The geometry of ecological interactions: simplifying spatial complexity, simplifying spatial complexity. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Diggle PJ (1983) Statistical analysis of spatial and spatio-temporal point patterns. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Phelps JH, Tucker CL III (2006) Lagrangian particle calculations of distributive mixing: limitations and applications. Chem Eng Sci 61:6826–6836Google Scholar
- Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (2007) Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Sharkey KJ, Fernandez C, Morgan KL, Peeler E, Thrush M, Turnbull JF, Bowers RG (2006) Pairlevelapproximations to the spatio-temporal dynamics of epidemics on asymmetric contact networks. J MathBiol 53, 61–85Google Scholar
- Van Kilsdonk JWJ, Bergers M, Van Kempen LCLT, Schalkwijk J, Swart GWM (2010) Keratinocytes drive melanoma invasion in a reconstructed skin model. Melanoma Res 20:372–380Google Scholar
- Zheng C, Bennett GD (2002) Applied contaminant transport modeling. Wiley-Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar