Advertisement

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 75, Issue 11, pp 2289–2303 | Cite as

A Stronger Necessary Condition for the Multistationarity of Chemical Reaction Networks

  • Sylvain SolimanEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Biochemical reaction networks grow bigger and bigger, fed by the high-throughput data provided by biologists and bred in open repositories of models allowing merging and evolution. Nevertheless, since the available data is still very far from permitting the identification of the increasing number of kinetic parameters of such models, the necessity of structural analyses for describing the dynamics of chemical networks appears stronger every day.

Using the structural information, notably from the stoichiometric matrix, of a biochemical reaction system, we state a more strict version of the famous Thomas’ necessary condition for multistationarity. In particular, the obvious cases where Thomas’ condition was trivially satisfied, mutual inhibition due to a multimolecular reaction and mutual activation due to a reversible reaction, can now easily be ruled out.

This more strict condition shall not be seen as some version of Thomas’ circuit functionality for the continuous case but rather as related and complementary to the whole domain of the structural analysis of (bio)chemical reaction systems, as pioneered by the chemical reaction network theory.

Keywords

Jacobian matrix Influence graph Feedback circuit Multistationarity Chemical reaction network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Steven Gay, a Ph.D. student in our team, who was the first to formulate the conjecture proven in this article, as well as its variant on oscillations. We also thank Christophe Soulé for very interesting discussions that have led to Sect. 5. Finally, we thank the whole Contraintes team for numerous and fruitful discussions on this topic.

References

  1. Angeli, D., De Leenheer, P., & Sontag, E. (2010). Graph-theoretic characterizations of monotonicity of chemical networks in reaction coordinates. J. Math. Biol., 61(4), 581–616. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Banaji, M. (2012). Cycle structure in sr and dsr graphs: implications for multiple equilibria and stable oscillation in chemical reaction networks. In Transactions on Petri nets and other models of concurrency V (pp. 1–21). Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banaji, M., & Craciun, G. (2009). Graph-theoretic approaches to injectivity and multiple equilibria in systems of interacting elements. Commun. Math. Sci., 7(4), 867–900. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Banaji, M., Donnell, P., & Baigent, S. (2007). P matrix properties, injectivity, and stability in chemical reaction systems. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 67(6), 1523–1547. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Cinquin, O., & Demongeot, J. (2002). Positive and negative feedback: striking a balance between necessary antagonists. J. Theor. Biol., 216(2), 229–241. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craciun, G., & Feinberg, M. (2005). Multiple equilibria in complex chemical reaction networks: I. The injectivity property. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 65(5), 1526–1546. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Craciun, G., & Feinberg, M. (2006). Multiple equilibria in complex chemical reaction networks: II. The species-reaction graph. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 66(4), 1321–1338. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Craciun, G., Tang, Y., & Feinberg, M. (2006). Understanding bistability in complex enzyme-driven reaction networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103(23), 8697–8702. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Fages, F., & Soliman, S. (2008a). Abstract interpretation and types for systems biology. Theor. Comput. Sci., 403(1), 52–70. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Fages, F., & Soliman, S. (2008b). From reaction models to influence graphs and back: a theorem. In Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 5054. Proceedings of formal methods in systems biology FMSB’08. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  11. Feliu, E., & Wiuf, C. (2012). Preclusion of switch behavior in reaction networks with mass-action kinetics. Appl. Math. Comput., 219(4), 1449–1467. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Gale, D., & Nikaido, H. (1965). The Jacobian matrix and global univalence of mappings. Math. Ann., 159, 81–93. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Gouzé, J.-L. (1998). Positive and negative circuits in dynamical systems. J. Biol. Syst., 6, 11–15. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Hucka, M., Hoops, S., Keating, S. M., Le Novère, N., Sahle, S., & Wilkinson, D. (2008). Systems biology markup language (SBML) level 2: structures and facilities for model definitions. Nat. Preced. doi: 10.1038/npre.2008.2715.1 Google Scholar
  15. Ivanova, A. N. (1979). Conditions for the uniqueness of the stationary states of kinetic systems, connected with the structures of their reaction mechanisms. Kinet. Katal., 20, 1019–1023. Google Scholar
  16. Ivanova, A. N., & Tarnopolskii, B. L. (1979). One approach to the determination of a number of qualitative features in the behavior of kinetic systems, and realization of this approach in a computer (critical conditions, autooscillations). Kinet. Katal., 20, 1541–1548. Google Scholar
  17. Kaltenbach, H.-M. (2012). A unified view on bipartite species-reaction and interaction graphs for chemical reaction networks. arXiv:1210.0320.
  18. Kaufman, M., Soulé, C., & Thomas, R. (2007). A new necessary condition on interaction graphs for multistationarity. J. Theor. Biol., 248, 675–685. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Mincheva, M., & Craciun, G. (2008). Multigraph conditions for multistability, oscillations and pattern formation in biochemical reaction networks. Proc. IEEE, 96(8), 1281–1291. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mincheva, M., & Roussel, M. R. (2007). Graph-theoretic methods for the analysis of chemical and biochemical networks. I. Multistability and oscillations in ordinary differential equation models. J. Math. Biol., 55(1), 61–86. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Plahte, E., Mestl, T., & Omholt, S. W. (1995). Feedback loops, stability and multistationarity in dynamical systems. J. Biol. Syst., 3(02), 409–413. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Remy, E., Ruet, P., & Thieffry, D. (2008). Graphic requirements for multistability and attractive cycles in a boolean dynamical framework. Adv. Appl. Math., 41(3), 335–350. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Richard, A., & Comet, J.-P. (2007). Necessary conditions for multistationarity in discrete dynamical systems. Discrete Appl. Math., 155, 2403–2413. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Richard, A., & Comet, J.-P. (2011). Stable periodicity and negative circuits in differential systems. J. Math. Biol., 63(3), 593–600. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Snoussi, E. H. (1998). Necessary conditions for multistationarity and stable periodicity. J. Biol. Syst., 6, 3–9. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Soliman, S. (2012). Invariants and other structural properties of biochemical models as a constraint satisfaction problem. Algorithms Mol. Biol., 7(15). doi: 10.1186/1748-7188-7-15
  27. Soulé, C. (2003). Graphic requirements for multistationarity. Complexus, 1, 123–133. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomas, R. (1981). On the relation between the logical structure of systems and their ability to generate multiple steady states or sustained oscillations. In Springer Series in Synergetics (Vol. 9, pp. 180–193). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Equipe ContraintesInria Paris-RocquencourtLe Chesnay CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations