Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 75, Issue 11, pp 2003–2027 | Cite as

The Common Ancestor Process Revisited

Original Article

Abstract

We consider the Moran model in continuous time with two types, mutation, and selection. We concentrate on the ancestral line and its stationary type distribution. Building on work by Fearnhead (J. Appl. Probab. 39 (2002), 38–54) and Taylor (Electron. J. Probab. 12 (2007), 808–847), we characterise this distribution via the fixation probability of the offspring of all individuals of favourable type (regardless of the offspring’s types). We concentrate on a finite population and stay with the resulting discrete setting all the way through. This way, we extend previous results and gain new insight into the underlying particle picture.

Keywords

Moran model Ancestral process with selection Ancestral line Common ancestor process Fixation probabilities 

References

  1. Baake, E., & Bialowons, R. (2008). Ancestral processes with selection: branching and Moran models. Banach Cent. Publ., 80, 33–52. MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton, N. H., Etheridge, A. M., & Sturm, A. K. (2004). Coalescence in a random background. Ann. Appl. Probab., 14, 754–785. MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Birkhoff, G., & Rota, G. (1969). Ordinary differential equations (2nd ed.). Lexington: Xerox College Publ. MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Durrett, R. (2002). Probability models for DNA sequence evolution. New York: Springer. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Durrett, R. (2008). Probability models for DNA sequence evolution (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Etheridge, A. M., & Griffiths, R. C. (2009). A coalescent dual process in a Moran model with genic selection. Theor. Popul. Biol., 75, 320–330. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Etheridge, A. M., Griffiths, R. C., & Taylor, J. E. (2010). A coalescent dual process in a Moran model with genic selection, and the Lambda coalescent limit. Theor. Popul. Biol., 78, 77–92. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ewens, W. J. (2004). Mathematical population genetics. I. Theoretical introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Fearnhead, P. (2002). The common ancestor at a nonneutral locus. J. Appl. Probab., 39, 38–54. MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford, L. R. (1955). Differential equations (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Karlin, S., & Taylor, H. M. (1981). A second course in stochastic processes. San Diego: Academic Press. MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Kingman, J. F. C. (1982a). The coalescent. Stoch. Process. Appl., 13, 235–248. MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Kingman, J. F. C. (1982b). On the genealogy of large populations. J. Appl. Probab., 19A, 27–43. MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Krone, S. M., & Neuhauser, C. (1997). Ancestral processes with selection. Theor. Popul. Biol., 51, 210–237. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Mano, S. (2009). Duality, ancestral and diffusion processes in models with selection. Theor. Popul. Biol., 75, 164–175. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Neuhauser, C., & Krone, S. M. (1997). The genealogy of samples in models with selection. Genetics, 145, 519–534. Google Scholar
  17. Norris, J. R. (1999). Markov chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. MATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Pokalyuk, C., & Pfaffelhuber, P. (2013). The ancestral selection graph under strong directional selection. Theor. Popul. Biol. 87, 25–33. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2003). Ancestral inference in population genetics models with selection. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat., 45, 901–931. MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Taylor, J. E. (2007). The common ancestor process for a Wright-Fisher diffusion. Electron. J. Probab., 12, 808–847. MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Vogl, C., & Clemente, F. (2012). The allele-frequency spectrum in a decoupled Moran model with mutation, drift, and directional selection, assuming small mutation rates. Theor. Popul. Biol., 81, 197–209. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Wakeley, J. (2008). Conditional gene genealogies under strong purifying selection. Mol. Biol. Evol., 25, 2615–2626. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wakeley, J., & Sargsyan, O. (2009). The conditional ancestral selection graph with strong balancing selection. Theor. Popul. Biol., 75, 355–364. CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technische FakultätUniversität BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations