Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 72, Issue 7, pp 1799–1819

Development of a Quantitative Model of Pregnane X Receptor (PXR) Mediated Xenobiotic Metabolizing Enzyme Induction

  • Nicholas S. Luke
  • Michael J. DeVito
  • Imran Shah
  • Hisham A. El-Masri
Original Article

Abstract

The pregnane X receptor plays an integral role in the regulation of hepatic metabolism. It has been shown to regulate CYP3A4, which is the most abundant cytochrome P450 in the human liver. With its large and flexible ligand-binding domain, PXR can be activated by an enormous range of relatively small, hydrophobic, exogenous compounds. Upon activation, PXR partners with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) to form a heterodimer. The newly formed heterodimer binds to an appropriate DNA response element, causing increased transcription. This leads to an induction in the level of CYP3A4. These mechanistic steps are included into a biologically-based mathematical model. The quantitative model predicts fold level inductions of CYP3A4 mRNA and protein in response to PXR activation. Model parameter values have been taken from literature when appropriate. Unknown parameter values are estimated by optimizing the model results to published in vivo and in vitro data sets. A sensitivity analysis is performed to evaluate the model structure and identify future data needs which would be critical to revising the model.

Keywords

Nuclear receptors Mathematical model Gene induction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

11538_2010_9508_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (259 kb)
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. (PDF 285KB)

References

  1. Aderem, A., 2005. Systems biology: Its practice and challenges. Cell 121, 511–513. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.020. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, N.A., Calzone, L., Chen, K.C., Ciliberto, A., Ramakrishnan, N., Shaffer, C.A., Sible, J.C., Tyson, J.J., Vass, M.T., Watson, L.T., Zwolak, J.W., 2003. Modeling regulatory networks at Virginia Tech. OMICS 7, 285–299. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, M.E., Krewski, D., 2009. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: Bringing the vision to life. Toxicol. Sci. 107, 324–330. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, R.P., Delp, M.D., Lindstedt, S.L., Rhomberg, L.R., Beliles, R.P., 1997. Physiological parameter values for physiologically based pharmacokinetic models. Toxicol. Ind. Health 13(4), 407–484. Google Scholar
  5. Carnahan, V.E., Redinbo, M.R., 2005. Structure and function of the human nuclear xenobiotic receptor PXR. Curr. Drug Metab. 6, 357–367. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dai, G., He, L., Bu, P., Wan, Y.-J.Y., 2008. Pregnane X receptor is essential for normal progression of liver regeneration. Hepatology 47, 1277–1287. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. David, J.A., 2007. Optimal Control, Estimation, and Shape Design: Analysis and Applications. PhD thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-07262007-194726/unrestricted/etd.pdf.
  8. Dotzlaw, H., Leygue, E., Watson, P., Murphy, L.C., 1999. The human orphan receptor PXR messenger RNA is expressed in both normal and neoplastic breast tissue. Clin. Cancer Res. 5, 2103–2107. Google Scholar
  9. Galetin, A., Burt, H., Gibbons, L., Houston, J.B., 2006. Prediction of time-dependent CYP3A4 drug-drug interactions: Impact of enzyme degradation, parallel elimination pathways, and intestinal inhibition. Drug Metab. Disp. 34(1), 166–175. doi:10.1124/dmd.105.006874. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goodwin, B., Hodgson, E., Liddle, C., 1999. The orphan human pregnane X receptor mediates the transcriptional activation of CYP3A4 by rifampicin through a distal enhancer module. Mol. Pharmacol. 56, 1329–1339. Google Scholar
  11. Handschin, C., Meyer, U.A., 2003. Induction of drug metabolism: The role of nuclear receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 55(4), 649–673. doi:10.1124/pr.55.4.2. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hargrove, J.L., 1993. Microcomputer-assisted kinetic modeling of mammailian gene expression. FASEB J. 7, 1163–1170. Google Scholar
  13. Jackson, D.A., Pombo, A., Iborra, F., 2000. The balance sheet for transcription: an analysis of nuclear RNA metabolism in mammalian cells. FASEB J. 14, 242–254. Google Scholar
  14. Kavlock, R.J., Ankley, G., Blancato, J., Breen, M., Conolly, R., Dix, D., Houck, K., Hubal, E., Judson, R., Rabinowitz, J., Richard, A., Setzer, R.W., Shah, I., Villeneuve, D., Weber, E., 2008. Computational toxicology—a state of the science mini review. Toxicol. Sci. 103, 14–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knudsen, T., Kavlock, R., Shah, I., Dix, D., Judson, R., Singh, A., Lau, C., Hunter, E., 2008. The virtual embryo project (v-Embryo). Google Scholar
  16. Kobayashi, K., Yamagami, S., Higuchi, T., Hosokawa, M., Chiba, K., 2004. Key structural features of ligands for activation of human pregnane X receptor. Drug Metab. Dispos. 32(4), 468–472. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kohn, M.C., Lucier, G.W., Clark, G.C., Sewall, C., Tritscher, A.M., Portier, C.J., 1993. A mechanistic model of effects of dioxin on gene expression in the rat liver. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 120, 138–154. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kohn, M.C., Walker, N.J., Kim, A.H., Portier, C.J., 2001. Physiological modeling of a proposed mechanism of enzyme inductino by TCDD. Toxicology 162, 193–208. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kretschmer, X.C., Baldwin, W.S., 2005. CAR and PXR: xenosensors of endocrine disrupters? Chem. Biol. Interact. 155, 111–128. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lehmann, J.M., Mckee, D.D., Watson, M.A., Willson, T.M., Moore, J.T., Kliewer, S.A., 1998. The human orphan nuclear receptor PXR is activated by compounds that regulate CYP3A4 gene expression and cause drug interactions. J. Clin. Invest. 102(5), 1016–1023. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lodish, H., Berk, A., Zipursky, L.S., Matsudaira, P., Baltimore, D., Darnell, J., 2000. Molecular Cell Biology, 4th edn. Freeman, New York. Google Scholar
  22. Loos, U., Musch, E., Jensen, J.C., Mikus, G., Schwabe, H.K., Eichelbaum, M., 1985. Pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous rifampicin during chronic administration. Klin. Wochenschr. 63, 1205–1211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moore, L.B., Parks, D.J., Jones, S.A., Bledsoe, R.K., Consler, T.G., Stimmel, J.B., Goodwin, B., Liddle, C., Blanchards, S.G., Willson, T.M., Collins, J.L., Kliewer, S.A., 2000. Orphan nuclear receptors constitutive androstane receptor and pregnane x receptor share xenobiotic and steroid ligands. J. Biol. Chem. 275(20), 15122–15127. doi:10.1074/jbc.M001215200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Novak, B., Tyson, J.J., 1997. Modeling the control of DNA replication in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 9147–9152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pascussi, J.M., Rober, A., Nguyen, M., Walrant-Debray, O., Garabedian, M., Martin, P., Pineau, T., Saric, J., Navarro, F., Maurel, P., Vilarem, M.J., 2005. Possible involvement of pregnane X receptor-enhanced CYP24 expression in drug-induced osteomalacia. J. Clin. Invest. 115(1), 177–186. doi:10.1175/JCI200521867. Google Scholar
  26. Pirone, J.R., Elston, T.C., 2004. Fluctuations in transcription factor binding can explain the graded and binary responses observed in inducible gene expression. J. Theor. Biol. 226, 111–121. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Sheiner, L.B., Beal, S.L., 1985. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates from several least squares procedures: Superiority of extended least squares. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 13(2), 185–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Slatter, J., Templeton, I.E., Castle, J., Kulkarni, A., Rushmore, T., Richards, K., He, Y., Dai, X., Cheng, O., 2006. Compendium of gene expression profiles comprising a baseline model of the human liver drug metabolism transcriptome. Xenobiotica 36(10–11), 938–962. doi:10.1080/00498250600861728. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stelling, J., Gilles, E.D., 2004. Mathematical modeling of complex regulatory networks. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 3(3), 172–179. doi:10.1109/TNB.2004.833688. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Svecova, L., Vrzal, R., Burysek, L., Anzenbacherova, E., Cerveny, L., Grim, J., Trejtnar, F., Kunes, J., Pour, M., Staud, F., Anzenbacher, P., Dvorak, Z., Pavek, P., 2008. Azone antimycotics differentially affect rifampicin-induced pregnane X receptor-mediated CYP3A4 gene expression. Drug Metab. Dispos. 36(2), 339–348. doi:10.1124/dmd.107.018341. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tan, Y.-M., Butterworth, B.E., Gargas, M.L., Conolly, R.B., 2003. Biologically motivated computational modeling of chloroform cytolethality and regenerative cellular proliferation. Toxicol. Sci. 75, 192–200. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfg152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tien, E., Negishi, M., 2006. Nuclear receptors CAR and PXR in the regulation of hepatic metabolism. Xenobiotica 36(10–11), 1152–1163. doi:10.1080/00498250600861827. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Timchalk, C., Walker, N.J., Mann, R.C., Metting, F.B., 2001. The virtual body workshop: current and future application of human biology models in environmental health research. Environ. Health Perspect. 109, 421–423. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tyson, J.J., Chen, K.C., Novak, B., 2003. Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 221–231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tyson, J.J., Novak, B., 2001. Regulation of the eukaryotic cell cycle: molecular antagonism, hysteresis, and irreversible transitions. J. Theor. Biol. 210, 249–263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Urquhart, B.L., Tirona, R.G., Kim, R.B., 2007. Nuclear receptors and the regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters: Implications for interindividual variability in response to drugs. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 47, 566–578. doi:10.1177/0091270007299930. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Watkins, R.E., Maglich, J.M., Moore, L.B., Wisely, G.B., Noble, S.M., Davis-Searles, P.R., Lambert, M.H., Kliewer, S.A., Redinbo, M.R., 2003. A crystal structure of human PXR in complex with the St. John’s wort compound hyperforin. Biochemistry 42, 1430–1438. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watkins, R.E., Wisely, G.B., Moore, L.B., Collins, J.L., Lambert, M.G., Williams, S.P., Willson, T.M., Kliewer, S.A., Redinbo, M.R., 2001. The human nuclear xenobiotic receptor PXR: structural determinants of directed promiscuity. Science 292, 2329–2333. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson, Z.E., Rostami-Hodjegan, A., Burn, J.L., Tooley, A., Boyle, J., Ellis, S.W., Tucker, G.T., 2003. Inter-individual variability in levels of human microsomal protein and hepatocellularity per gram of liver. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 56, 433–440. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang, Q., Andersen, M.E., 2007. Dose response relationship in anti-stress gene regulatory networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3(3), e24. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030024. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. Zheng, Z., Stewart, P.S., 2002. Penetration of rifampin through staphylococcus epidermis biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemoter. 46(3), 900–903. doi:10.1128/AAC.46.3.900-903.2002. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas S. Luke
    • 1
  • Michael J. DeVito
    • 2
  • Imran Shah
    • 4
  • Hisham A. El-Masri
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsNorth Carolina Agricultural and Technical State UniversityGreensboroUSA
  2. 2.National Toxicology ProgramNational Institute for Environmental Health SciencesRTPUSA
  3. 3.Integrated Systems Toxicology DivisionNHEERL, ORD, U.S. EPARTPUSA
  4. 4.National Center for Computational ToxicologyORD, U.S. EPARTPUSA

Personalised recommendations