Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 72, Issue 6, pp 1334–1360 | Cite as

Modeling the Effects of Developmental Variation on Insect Phenology

Original Article

Abstract

Phenology, the timing of developmental events such as oviposition or pupation, is highly dependent on temperature; since insects are ectotherms, the time it takes them to complete a life stage (development time) depends on the temperatures they experience. This dependence varies within and between populations due to variation among individuals that is fixed within a life stage (giving rise to what we call persistent variation) and variation from random effects within a life stage (giving rise to what we call random variation). It is important to understand how both types of variation affect phenology if we are to predict the effects of climate change on insect populations.

We present three nested phenology models incorporating increasing levels of variation. First, we derive an advection equation to describe the temperature-dependent development of a population with no variation in development time. This model is extended to incorporate persistent variation by introducing a developmental phenotype that varies within a population, yielding a phenotype-dependent advection equation. This is further extended by including a diffusion term describing random variation in a phenotype-dependent Fokker–Planck development equation. These models are also novel because they are formulated in terms of development time rather than developmental rate; development time can be measured directly in the laboratory, whereas developmental rate is calculated by transforming laboratory data. We fit the phenology models to development time data for mountain pine beetles (MPB) (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins [Coleoptera: Scolytidae]) held at constant temperatures in laboratory experiments. The nested models are parameterized using a maximum likelihood approach. The results of the parameterization show that the phenotype-dependent advection model provides the best fit to laboratory data, suggesting that MPB phenology may be adequately described in terms of persistent variation alone. MPB phenology is simulated using phloem temperatures and attack time distributions measured in central Idaho. The resulting emergence time distributions compare favorably to field observations.

Keywords

Phenology Mountain pine beetle Fokker–Planck equation Mathematical model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amman, G.D., 1972. Some factors affecting oviposition behavior of the mountain pine beetle. Environ. Entomol. 1(6), 691–695. Google Scholar
  2. Bentz, B.J., 2006. Mountain pine beetle population sampling: inferences from Lindgren pheremone traps and tree emergence cages. Can. J. For. Res. 36, 351–360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentz, B.J., Mullins, D.E., 1999. Ecology of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) cold hardening in the intermountain west. Environ. Entomol. 28(4), 577–587. Google Scholar
  4. Bentz, B.J., Logan, J.A., Amman, G.D., 1991. Temperature-dependent development of the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and simulation of its phenology. Can. Entomol. 123, 1083–1094. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentz, B.J., Logan, J.A., Vandygriff, J., 2001. Latitudinal variation in Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) development time and adult size. Can. Entomol. 133, 375–387. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berryman, A.A., Dennis, B., Raffa, K.F., Stenseth, N.C., 1985. Evolution of optimal group attack, with particular reference to bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecology 66(3), 898–903. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, A., Taylor, S., Régnière, J., Safranyik, L., 2003. Effects of climate change on range expansion by the mountain pine beetle in British Columbia. In: Shore, T., Brooks, J., Stone, J. (Eds.), Mountain Pine Beetle Symposium: Challenges and Solutions. Information Report BC-X-399, pp. 223–232, Klowna, British Columbia, October 2003. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC. Google Scholar
  8. Cole, W.E., 1981. Some risks and causes of mortality in mountain pine beetle populations: a long-term analysis. Res. Popul. Ecol. 23(1), 116–144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danks, H.V., 1987. Insect Dormancy: An Ecological Prospective. Monograph Series, vol. 1. Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods), Ottawa. Google Scholar
  10. Eubank, W., Atmar, J., Ellington, J., 1973. The significance and thermodynamics of fluctuating versus static thermal environments on Helios zea egg development rates. Environ. Entomol. 2(4), 491–496. Google Scholar
  11. Fokker, A.D., 1914. Die mittlere energie rotierender elektrischer dipole im strahlungsfeld. Ann. Phys. 43, 810–820. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilbert, E., Powell, J.A., Logan, J.A., 2004. Comparison of three models predicting developmental milestones given environmental and individual variation. Bull. Math. Biol. 66, 1821–1850. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenkins, J.L., Powell, J.A., Logan, J.A., Bentz, B.J., 2001. Low seasonal temperatures promote life cycle synchronization. Bull. Math. Biol. 63(3), 573–595. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kramers, H.A., 1940. Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions. Physica 7, 284–304. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Logan, J.A., 1988. Toward an expert system for development of pest simulation models. Environ. Entomol. 17(2), 359–376. MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Logan, J.A., Amman, G.D., 1986. A distribution model for egg development in mountain pine beetle. Can. Entomol. 118, 361–372. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Logan, J.A., Powell, J.A., 2001. Ghost forests, global warming and the mountain pine beetle. Am. Entomol. 47, 160–173. Google Scholar
  18. Logan, J.A., Wollkind, D.J., Hoyt, S.C., Tanigoshi, L.K., 1976. An analytic model for description of temperature dependent rate phenomena in arthropods. Environ. Entomol. 5(6), 1133–1140. Google Scholar
  19. Logan, J., Bolstad, P., Bentz, B., Perkins, D., 1995. Assessing the effects of changing climate on mountain pine beetle dynamics. In: Interior West Global Change Workshop. General Technical Report RM-GTR-262, pp. 92–105, Fort Collins, Colorado, April 1995. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Google Scholar
  20. Memmott, J., Craze, P.G., Waser, N.M., Price, M.V., 2007. Global warming and the disruption of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecol. Lett. 10, 710–717. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moyal, J.E., 1949. Stochastic processes and statistical physics. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 11(2), 150–210. MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Parmesan, C., Yohe, G., 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Planck, M., 1917. Ueber einen satz der statistichen dynamik und eine erweiterung in der quantumtheorie. Sitzungsber. Konigl. Preuß. Akad. Wiss. 324–341. Google Scholar
  24. Powell, J.A., Logan, J.A., 2005. Insect seasonality: circle map analysis of temperature-driven life cycles. Theor. Popul. Biol. 67, 161–179. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Powell, J.A., Jenkins, J.L., Logan, J.A., Bentz, B.J., 2000. Seasonal temperature alone can synchronize life cycles. Bull. Math. Biol. 62(5), 977–998. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raffa, K.F., Berryman, A.A., 1983. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecol. Monogr. 53(1), 27–49. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Risken, H., 1996. The Fokker–Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin. MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Safranyik, L., Carrol, A.L., 2006. The biology and epidemiology of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests. In: The Mountain Pine Beetle: A Synthesis of Biology, Management, and Impacts on Lodgepole Pine, pp. 3–66. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, British Columbia Google Scholar
  29. Sharpe, P., DeMichele, D., 1977. Reaction kinetics of poikilotherm development. J. Theor. Biol. 64, 649–670. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharpe, P., Curry, G., DeMichele, D., Cole, C., 1977. Distribution model of organism development times. J. Theor. Biol. 66, 21–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stinner, R.E., Butler, J.G.D., Bacheler, J.S., Tuttle, C., 1975. Simulation of temperature-dependent development in population dynamics models. Can. Entomol. 107, 1167–1174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor, F., 1981. Ecology and the evolution of physiological time in insects. Am. Nat. 117(1), 1–23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Visser, M.E., Holleman, L.J.M., 2001. Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 268, 289–294. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yurk, B.P., 2009. Modeling the evolution of insect phenology with particular reference to mountain pine beetle. PhD thesis, Utah State University. Google Scholar
  35. Yurk, B.P., Powell, J.A., 2009. Modeling the evolution of insect phenology. Bull. Math. Biol. 71, 952–979. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. Zaslavski, V., 1988. Insect Development: Photoperiodic and Temperature Control. Springer, Berlin. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsHope CollegeHollandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations