Advertisement

Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 72, Issue 1, pp 230–257 | Cite as

Leading Students to Investigate Diffusion as a Model of Brine Shrimp Movement

  • Brynja R. Kohler
  • Rebecca J. Swank
  • James W. Haefner
  • James A. Powell
Education Article

Abstract

Integrating experimental biology laboratory exercises with mathematical modeling can be an effective tool to enhance mathematical relevance for biologists and to emphasize biological realism for mathematicians. This paper describes a lab project designed for and tested in an undergraduate biomathematics course. In the lab, students follow and track the paths of individual brine shrimp confined in shallow salt water in a Petri dish. Students investigate the question, “Is the movement well characterized as a 2-dimensional random walk?” Through open, but directed discussions, students derive the corresponding partial differential equation, gain an understanding of the solution behavior, and model brine shrimp dispersal under the experimental conditions developed in class. Students use data they collect to estimate a diffusion coefficient, and perform additional experiments of their own design tracking shrimp migration for model validation. We present our teaching philosophy, lecture notes, instructional and lab procedures, and the results of our class-tested experiments so that others can implement this exercise in their classes. Our own experience has led us to appreciate the pedagogical value of allowing students and faculty to grapple with open-ended questions, imperfect data, and the various issues of modeling biological phenomena.

Keywords

Project-based learning Undergraduate education Brine shrimp Artemia franciscana Diffusion Random walks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berg, H.C., 1993. Random Walks in Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Google Scholar
  2. Cangelosi, J.S., 2003. Teaching Mathematics in Secondary and Middle School: An Interactive Approach, 3rd edn. Merrill/Prentice Hall, Columbus/New York. Google Scholar
  3. Erickson, D.K., 1999. A problem-based approach to mathematics education. Math. Teach. 92(6), 516–521. MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Fisher, R., 1937. The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Ann. Eugen. 7, 335–369. Google Scholar
  5. Goos, M., 2004. Learning mathematics in a community of inquiry. J. Res. Math. Educ. 35(4), 258–291. MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., 2004. Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ. Psychol. Rev. 16(3), 235–266. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Soloway, E., 1994. A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. Elem. Sch. J. 94(5), 483–497. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krantz, S.G., 1999. How to Teach Mathematics, 2nd edn. American Mathematical Society, Providence. Google Scholar
  9. Lay, D.C., 2003. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River. Google Scholar
  10. Ledder, G. (ed.), 2008. PRIMUS Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, vol. 18. Taylor & Francis, London. Google Scholar
  11. Miller, L.N. (ed.), 1994. Ecology, vol. 75. Ecological Society of America, Ithaca. Google Scholar
  12. Pollatsek, H., Barker, W., Bressoud, D., Epp, S., Ganter, S., Haver, B., 2004. Undergraduate Programs and Courses in the Mathematical Sciences: CUPM Curriculum Guide 2004. The Mathematical Association of America, Washington. Google Scholar
  13. Powell, J.A., Cangelosi, J.S., Harris, A.M., 1998. Games to teach mathematical modeling. SIAM Rev. 40, 87–95. zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Rassmussen, C., Marrongelle, K., 2006. Pedagogical content tools: integrating student reasoning and mathematics in instruction. J. Res. Math. Educ. 37(5), 388–420. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rogers, E.C., Reynolds, B.E., Davidson, N.A., Thomas, A.D. (eds.), 2001. Cooperative Learning in Undergraduate Mathematics: Issues that Matter & Strategies that Work. The Mathematical Association of America, Washington. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Skellam, J., 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38, 196–218. zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Solomon, G., 2003. Project-based learning: A primer. Technol. Learn. 23(6), 20–30. Google Scholar
  18. Steen, L.A. (ed.), 2005. Math & Bio 2010: Linking Undergraduate Disciplines. The Mathematical Association of America, Washington. zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomas, J.W., 2000. A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. The Autodesk Foundation, San Rafael. Google Scholar
  20. Turchin, P., 1998. Quantitative Analysis of Movement: Measuring and Modeling Population Redistribution in Animals and Plants. Sinauer, Sunderland. Google Scholar
  21. Turing, A., 1952. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 237(641), 37–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. USGS, 2009, Brine shrimp and ecology of great salt lake. http://ut.water.usgs.gov/greatsaltlake/shrimp/. Accessed 25 March 2009.

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brynja R. Kohler
    • 1
  • Rebecca J. Swank
    • 1
  • James W. Haefner
    • 2
  • James A. Powell
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations