The Evolution of Conditional Dispersal Strategies in Spatially Heterogeneous Habitats
- 296 Downloads
- 33 Citations
Abstract
To understand the evolution of dispersal, we study a Lotka–Volterra reaction–diffusion–advection model for two competing species in a heterogeneous environment. The two species are assumed to be identical except for their dispersal strategies: both species disperse by random diffusion and advection along environmental gradients, but with slightly different random dispersal or advection rates. Two new phenomena are found for one-dimensional habitats and monotone intrinsic growth rates: (i) If both species disperse only by random diffusion, i.e., no advection, it was well known that the slower diffuser always wins. We show that if both species have the same advection rate which is suitably large, the faster dispersal will evolve; (ii) If both species have the same random dispersal rate, it was known that the species with a little advection along the resource gradient always wins, provided that the other species is a pure random disperser and the habitat is convex. We show that if both species have the same random dispersal rate and both also have suitably large advection rates, the species with a little smaller advection rate always wins. Implications of these results for the habitat choices of species will be discussed. Some future directions and open problems will be addressed.
Keywords
Evolution of dispersal Reaction Advection CompetitionReferences
- Amarasekare, P., 2008. Spatial dynamics of foodwebs. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 479–500. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Armsworth, P.R., Roughgarden, J.E., 2005a. The impact of directed versus random movement on population dynamics and biodiversity patterns. Am. Nat. 165, 449–465. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Armsworth, P.R., Roughgarden, J.E., 2005b. Disturbance induces the contrasting evolution of reinforcement and dispersiveness in directed and random movers. Evolution 59, 2083–2096. Google Scholar
- Aronson, D.G., 1985. The role of diffusion in mathematical population biology: Skellam revisited. In: Capasso, V., Grosso, E., Paveri-Fontana, S.L. (Eds.), Mathematics in Biology and Medicine, Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol. 57, pp. 2–6. Springer, Berlin. Google Scholar
- Baskett, M.L., Micheli, F., Levin, S.A., 2007. Designing marine reserves for interacting species: Insights from theory. Biol. Conserv. 137, 163–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Belgacem, F., 1997. Elliptic Boundary Value Problems with Indefinite Weights: Variational Formulations of the Principal Eigenvalue and Applications, Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics, vol. 368. Longman, Harlow. MATHGoogle Scholar
- Belgacem, F., Cosner, C., 1995. The effects of dispersal along environmental gradients on the dynamics of populations in heterogeneous environment. Can. Appl. Math. Q. 3, 379–397. MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Bowler, D.E., Benten, T.G., 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behavior to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. 80, 205–225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cantrell, R.S., Cosner, C., 2003. Spatial Ecology via Reaction-Diffusion Equations, Series in Mathematical and Computational Biology. Wiley, New York. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cantrell, R.S., Cosner, C., Lou, Y., 2006. Movement towards better environments and the evolution of rapid diffusion. Math. Biosci. 204, 199–214. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Cantrell, R.S., Cosner, C., DeAngelis, D.L., Padrón, V., 2007a. The ideal free distribution as an evolutionarily stable strategy. J. Biol. Dyn. 1, 249–271. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Cantrell, R.S., Cosner, C., Lou, Y., 2007b. Advection mediated coexistence of competing species. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. A 137, 497–518. MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Cantrell, R.S., Cosner, C., Lou, Y., 2008. Approximating the ideal free distribution via reaction–diffusion–advection equations. J. Differ. Equ. 245, 3687–3703. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Chen, X.F., Lou, Y., 2008. Principal eigenvalue and eigenfunction of elliptic operator with large convection and its application to a competition model. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 57, 627–658. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Chen, X.F., Hambrock, R., Lou, Y., 2008. Evolution of conditional dispersal: a reaction–diffusion–advection model. J. Math. Biol. 57, 361–386. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Cosner, C., Lou, Y., 2003. Does movement toward better environments always benefit a population? J. Math. Anal. Appl. 277, 489–503. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Dancer, E.N., 1995. Positivity of maps and applications. Topological nonlinear analysis. In: Matzeu, Vignoli (Eds.), Prog. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., vol.15, pp. 303–340. Birkhauser, Boston. Google Scholar
- Doncaster, C.P., Clobert, J., Doligez, B., Gustafsson, L., Danchin, E., 1997. Balanced dispersal between spatially varying local populations: an alternative to the source-sink model. Am. Nat. 150, 425–445. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dockery, J., Hutson, V., Mischaikow, K., Pernarowski, M., 1998. The evolution of slow dispersal rates: a reaction–diffusion model. J. Math. Biol. 37, 61–83. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Doebeli, M., 1995. Dispersal and dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 47, 82–106. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dieckmann, U., 1997. Can adaptive dynamics invade? Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 128–131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dieckmann, U., Law, R., 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: A derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34, 579–612. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Diekmann, O., 2003. A beginner’s guide to adaptive dynamics. Banach Cent. Publ. 63, 47–86. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Diekmann, O., Jabin, P.-E., Mischler, S., Perthame, B., 2005. The dynamics of adaptation: an illuminating example and a Hamilton–Jacobi approach. Theor. Popul. Biol. 67, 257–271. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Farnsworth, K., Beecham, J., 1999. How do grazers achieve their distribution? A continuum of models from random diffusion to the ideal free distribution using biased random walks. Am. Nat. 153, 509–526. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Farnsworth, K.D., Anderson, A.R.A., 2001. How simple grazing rules can lead to persistent boundaries in vegetation communities. Oikos 95, 15–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Faugeras, B., Maury, O., 2007. Modeling fish population movements: From an individual-based representation to an advection–diffusion equation. J. Theor. Biol. 247, 837–848. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Geritz, S.A.H., Kisdi, E., Meszena, G., Metz, J.A.J., 1998. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12, 35–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gilbarg, D., Trudinger, N., 1983. Elliptic Partial Differential Equation of Second Order, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin. Google Scholar
- Grindrod, P., 1988. Models of individual aggregation or clustering in single and multiple-species communities. J. Math. Biol. 26, 651–660. MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Gyllenberg, M., Parvinen, K., 2001. Necessary and sufficient conditions for evolutionary suicide. Bull. Math. Biol. 63, 981–993. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hastings, A., 1983. Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal? Theor. Popul. Biol. 24, 244–251. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Hess, P., 1991. Periodic Parabolic Boundary Value Problems and Positivity. Longman, Harlow. MATHGoogle Scholar
- Hillen, T., 2003. Transport equations with resting phases. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 14, 613–636. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Hirsch, M.W., 1988. Stability and convergence in strongly monotone dynamical systems. J. Reine Angew. Math. 383, 1–51. MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Holmes, E.E., Lewis, M.A., Banks, J.E., Veit, R.R., 1984. Partial differential equations in ecology: spatial interactions and population dynamics. Ecology 75, 17–29. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holt, R.D., 1985. Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor. Popul. Biol. 28, 181–208. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Holt, R.D., McPeek, M.A., 1996. Chaotic population dynamics favors the evolution of dispersal. Am. Nat. 148, 709–718. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hsu, S., Smith, H., Waltman, P., 1996. Competitive exclusion and coexistence for competitive systems on ordered Banach spaces. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 348, 4083–4094. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Huang, Y., 2005. How do cross-migration models arise. Math. Biosci. 195, 127–140. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Hutson, V., Mischaikow, K., Poláčik, P., 2001. The evolution of dispersal rates in a heterogeneous time-periodic environment. J. Math. Biol. 43, 501–533. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Karim, M.R., Sekine, M., Higuchi, T., Imai, T., Ukida, M., 2003. Simulation of fish behavior and mortality in hypoxic water in an enclosed bay. Ecol. Model. 159, 27–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kirkland, S., Li, C.-K., Schreiber, S.J., 2006. On the evolution of dispersal in patchy environments. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 66, 1366–1382. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Levin, S.A., Muller-Landau, H.C., Nathan, R., Chave, J., 2003. The ecology and evolution of seed dispersal: a theoretical perspective. Annu. Rev. Eco. Evol. Syst. 34, 575–604. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lutscher, F., Pachepsky, E., Lewis, M., 2005. The effect of dispersal patterns on stream populations. SIAM Rev. 47, 749–772. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Lutscher, F., McCauley, E., Lewis, M., 2007. Spatial patterns and coexistence mechanisms in systems with unidirectional flow. Theor. Popul. Biol. 71, 267–277. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matano, H., 1984. Existence of nontrivial unstable sets for equilibriums of strongly order-preserving systems. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 30, 645–673. MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- McPeek, M.A., Holt, R.D., 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am. Nat. 140, 1010–1027. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morris, D.W., Diffendorfer, J.E., Lundberg, P., 2004. Dispersal among habitats varying in fitness: reciprocating migration through ideal habitat selection. Oioks 107, 559–575. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murray, J.D., 1993. Mathematical Biology, 2nd edn. Springer, New York. MATHGoogle Scholar
- Okubo, A., Levin, S.A., 2001. Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives, 2nd edn. Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics, vol. 14. Springer, Berlin. Google Scholar
- Okubo, A., Maini, P.K., Williams, M.H., Murray, J.D., 1989. On the spread of the grey squirrel in Britain. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 238, 113–125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Poláčik, P., 2006. Private communication. Google Scholar
- Potapov, A.B., Lewis, M.A., 2004. Climate and competition: the effect of moving range boundaries on habitat invasibility. Bull. Math. Biol. 66, 975–1008. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Shigesada, N., Kawasaki, K., 1997. Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice, Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar
- Smith, H., 1995. Monotone Dynamical Systems, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 41. American Mathematical Society, Providence. MATHGoogle Scholar
- Travis, J.M.J., Dytham, C., 1999. Habitat persistence, habitat availability and the evolution of dispersal. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 723–728. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Travis, J.M.J., French, D.R., 2000. Dispersal functions and spatial models: expanding our dispersal toolbox. Ecol. Lett. 3, 163–165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yodzis, P., 1989. Introduction to Theoretical Ecology. Harper and Row, New York. MATHGoogle Scholar