Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 69, Issue 8, pp 2447–2466

To Cut or Not to Cut: A Modeling Approach for Assessing the Role of Male Circumcision in HIV Control

Original Article

Abstract

A recent randomized controlled trial shows a significant reduction in women-to-men transmission of HIV due to male circumcision. Such development calls for a rigorous mathematical study to ascertain the full impact of male circumcision in reducing HIV burden, especially in resource-poor nations where access to anti-retroviral drugs is limited. First of all, this paper presents a compartmental model for the transmission dynamics of HIV in a community where male circumcision is practiced. In addition to having a disease-free equilibrium, which is locally-asymptotically stable whenever a certain epidemiological threshold is less than unity, the model exhibits the phenomenon of backward bifurcation, where the disease-free equilibrium coexists with a stable endemic equilibrium when the threshold is less than unity. The implication of this result is that HIV may persist in the population even when the reproduction threshold is less than unity. Using partial data from South Africa, the study shows that male circumcision at 60% efficacy level can prevent up to 220,000 cases and 8,200 deaths in the country within a year. Further, it is shown that male circumcision can significantly reduce, but not eliminate, HIV burden in a community. However, disease elimination is feasible if male circumcision is combined with other interventions such as ARVs and condom use. It is shown that the combined use of male circumcision and ARVs is more effective in reducing disease burden than the combined use of male circumcision and condoms for a moderate condom compliance rate.

Keywords

HIV/AIDS Male circumcision Reproduction number Backward bifurcation Condoms ARVs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aubert, B., Taljaard, D., Lagrade, E., Sobngwi-Tambekou, J., Sitta, R. et al., 2005. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med. 2, e298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, R., Neema, S., Otheno, R., 1999. Sexual behaviors and other HIV risk factors in circumcised and uncircumcised men in Uganda. J. Acquir Immune Defic. Syndr. 22, 294–301. Google Scholar
  3. Blower, S., Koelle, K., Mills, J., 2002. Health policy modeling: epidemic control, HIV vaccines, and risky behavior. In: Kaplan, Brookmeyer (Eds.) Qualitative Evaluation of HIV Prevention Programs, pp. 260–289. Yale University Press. Google Scholar
  4. Brian, G. Williams, Lioyd-Smith, J.O., Gouws, E., Hankins, C., Getz, W.M., Hargrove, J., de Zoysa, I., Dye, C., Auvert, B., 2006. The potential impact of male circumcision on HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS Med. 3(7), e262. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. David, K.R., Weller, S.C., 1999. The effectiveness of condoms in reducing heterosexual transmision of HIV. Fam. Plann. Perspect 31(6), 272–279. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elbasha, E.H., Gumel, A.B., 2006. Theoretical assessment of public health impact of imperfect prophylactic HIV-1 vaccines with therapeutic benefits. Bull. Math. Biol. 68, 577–614. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fink, A., 1986. A possible explanation for heterosexual male infection with AIDS. N. Engl. J. Med. 314, 1167. Google Scholar
  8. Gumel, A.B., McCluskey, C.C. et al., 2006. Mathematical study of a staged-progression HIV model with imperfect vaccine. Bull. Math. Biol. 68(8), 2105–2128. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Hutchinson, J., 1885. On the influence of circumcision in preventing syphilis. Med. Times Gazette 1, 542–543. Google Scholar
  10. Lansky, A., Nakashima, A., Jones, J., 2000. Risk behaviors related to heterosexual transmission from HIV-infected persons. Sex. Transm. Dis. 27, 483–489. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moses, S., Bailey, R.C., Ronald, A.R., 1998. Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks. Sex. Transm. Infect. 74, 368–373. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Perelson, A.S., Nelson, P.W., 1999. Mathematical analysis of HIV-1 dynamics in vivo. SIAM Rev. 41(1), 3–44. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Robert, C.B., Francis, A.P., Stephen, M., 2001. Male circumcision and HIV prevention: current knowledge and future research directions. Lancet Infect. Dis. 1, 223–231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Report on the global AIDS epidemic: Executive summary, 2006. A UNAIDS 10th anniversary special edition. Google Scholar
  15. Siegfried, N., Muller, M., Deeks, J., Volmink, J., Egger, M. et al., 2005. HIV and male circumcision—a systematic review with assessment of the quality of studies. Lancer Infect. Dis. 5, 165–173. Google Scholar
  16. USAID 2004. The President’s emergency plan for AIDS relief: US five-year Global HIV/AIDS strategy. Available: http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/global_health/aids/pepfar.html, accessed 25 May 2006.
  17. van den Driessche, P., Watmough, J., 2002. Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. Math. Biosci. 180, 29–48. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Weiss, H.A., Quigley, M.A., Hayes, R.J., 2000. Male circumcision and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS 14, 2361–2370. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. WHO, UNAIDS, 2005. Progress on access to anti-retroviral therapy: an update on “3 by 5”, p. 34 World Health Organization, Geneva. Google Scholar
  20. Wilson, P.A., Binagwaho, A., Ruxin, J., 2005. Combating AIDS in the developing world, p. 276 Earthscan, London. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. N. Podder
    • 1
  • O. Sharomi
    • 1
  • A. B. Gumel
    • 1
  • S. Moses
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Department of Medical Microbiology and MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations