Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 69, Issue 5, pp 1727–1746 | Cite as

A Quasistationary Analysis of a Stochastic Chemical Reaction: Keizer’s Paradox

Original Article

Abstract

For a system of biochemical reactions, it is known from the work of T.G. Kurtz [J. Appl. Prob. 8, 344 (1971)] that the chemical master equation model based on a stochastic formulation approaches the deterministic model based on the Law of Mass Action in the infinite system-size limit in finite time. The two models, however, often show distinctly different steady-state behavior. To further investigate this “paradox,” a comparative study of the deterministic and stochastic models of a simple autocatalytic biochemical reaction, taken from a text by the late J. Keizer, is carried out. We compute the expected time to extinction, the true stochastic steady state, and a quasistationary probability distribution in the stochastic model. We show that the stochastic model predicts the deterministic behavior on a reasonable time scale, which can be consistently obtained from both models. The transition time to the extinction, however, grows exponentially with the system size. Mathematically, we identify that exchanging the limits of infinite system size and infinite time is problematic. The appropriate system size that can be considered sufficiently large, an important parameter in numerical computation, is also discussed.

Keywords

Stochastic models Nonlinear Chemical kinetics Quasistationary Uniform convergence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, L.J.S., 2003. An Introduction to Stochastic Processes with Applications to Biology. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  2. Ashih, A.C.W., 2001. Spatial and stochastic models for population growth with sexual and asexual reproduction, Ph.D. Thesis, Duke University.Google Scholar
  3. Baras, F., Mansour, M.M., Pearson, J.E., 1996. Microscopic simulation of chemical bistability in homogeneous systems. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 8257–8261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chung, K.-L., 1967. Markov Chains with Stationary Transition Probabilities. Springer-Verlag, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Courant R., Hilbert, D., 1952. Methods of Mathematical Physics. Interscience Pub., New York.Google Scholar
  6. Epstein, I.R., Pojman, J.A., 1998. An Introduction to Nonlinear Chemical Dynamics: Oscillations, Waves, Patterns, and Chaos. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ethier, S.N., Kurtz, T.G., 1986. Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence, John Wiley & Sons, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Érdi, P., Tóth, J., 1989. Mathematical Models of Chemical Reactions: Theory and Applications of Deterministic and Stochastic Models. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gillespie, D., 1976. General method for numerically simulating stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J. Comput. Phys. 22, 403–434.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Gillespie, D., 1977. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2340–2361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grasman, J., van Herwaarden, O.A., 1999. Asymptotic Methods for the Fokker-Planck equation and the Exit Problem in Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Hänggi, H.G., Talkner, P., Thomas, H., 1984. Bistable systems: master equation versus Fokker-Planck modeling. Phys. Rev. A. 29, 371–378.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Heuett, W.J., Qian, H., 2006. Grand canonical Markov model: a stochastic theory for open nonequilibrium biochemical networks. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 044110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keizer, J., 1987. Statistical Thermodynamics of Nonequilibrium Processes. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Kurtz, T.G., 1971. Limit theorems for sequences of jump Markov processes approximating ordinary differential equations. J. Appl. Prob. 8, 344–356.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurtz, T.G. (1972. The relationship between stochastic and deterministic models for chemical reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 57, 2976–2978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leontovich, M.A., 1935. Basic equations of the kinetic gas theory from the point of view of the theory of random processes (in Russian). Zh. Teoret. Ehksper. Fiz. 5, 211–231.Google Scholar
  18. Luo, J.-L., Van der Broeck, C., Nicolis, G., 1984. Stability criteria and fluctuations around nonequilibrium states. Z. Phys. B. Cond. Matt. 56, 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McAdams, H.H., Arkin, A., 1999. It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. Trends Genet. 15, 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McQuarrie, D.A., 1967. Stochastic approach to chemical kinetics. J. Appl. Prob. 4, 413–478.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Murray, J.D., 2002. Mathematical Biology I: An Introduction, 3rd Ed. Springer, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Nasell, I., 2001. Extinction and quasi-stationarity in the Verhulst logistic model, J. Theor. Biol. 211, 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Noyes, R.M., Field, R.J., 1974. Oscillatory chemical reactions. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 25, 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paulsson, J., Berg, O.G., Ehrenberg, M., 2000. Stochastic focusing: Fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7148–7153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qian, H., Reluga, T.C., 2005. Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and nonlinear kinetics in a cellular signaling switch. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 028101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Qian, H., Saffarian, S., Elson, E. L., 2002, Concentration fluctuations in a mesoscopic oscillation chemical reaction system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10376–10381.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Reddy, V.T.N., 1975. On the existence of the steady state in the stochastic Volterra-Lotka model. J. Stat. Phys. 13, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Samoilov, M., Plyasunov, S., Arkin, A.P., 2005, Stochastic amplification and signaling in enzymatic futile cycles through noise-induced bistability with oscillations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2310–2315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schnakenberg, J., 1976. Network theory of microscopic and macroscopic behavior of master equation systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 48, 571–585.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. Sipos, T., Tóth, J., Érdi, P., 1974a. Stochastic simulation of complex chemical reactions by digital computer, I. The model. Reaction Kinetics Catalysis Lett. 1, 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sipos, T., Tóth, J., Érdi, P., 1974b. Stochastic simulation of complex chemical reactions by digital computer, II. Applications. Reaction Kinetics Catalysis Lett. 1, 209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smolen, P., Baxter, D.A., Byrne, J.H., 2000. Modeling transcriptional control in gene networks — methods, recent results, and future directions. Bull. Math. Biol. 62, 247–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Srivastava, R., You, L., Summers, J., Yin, J., 2002. Stochastic vs. deterministic modeling of intracellular viral kinetics. J. Theor. Biol. 218, 309–321.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor, H.M., Karlin, S., 1998. An Introduction to Stochastic Modeling, 3rd Ed. Academic Press, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Turner, T.E., Schnell, S., Burrage, K., 2004. Stochastic approaches for modeling in vivo reactions. Comput. Biol. Chem. 28, 165–178.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsUniversity of Washington SeattleSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations