pp 1–2 | Cite as

Leadership Best Practices: How Far We Have Come and How Far We Need To Go (Part I)

  • Emily D. CampionEmail author
  • Linda L. Campion
Column: Leading Matters

Our understanding of leadership has come a long way. As an area of research with one of the richest histories, we are fortunate enough to be able to look back and see how far we have come. One hundred years ago, we submitted to the “Great Man” theory of leadership, accepting good leadership as only attributable to the more Herculean of us (Borgatta et al. 1954; Rost 1991). Now, in business schools across the globe, we see leadership development programs transform undergraduate students into decisive, confident, and approachable leaders—at least that is the hope. In this two-part column, we examine how far we have come in leadership research and discuss where we need to go. In the current part (Part I), we provide a bite-sized overview of leadership principles, plucking tried-and-true best practices and also presenting more nuanced findings from the leadership research. In Part II, we will discuss leadership in a context that challenges some of our current approaches: virtual...


Leadership Leader effectiveness Best practices 



  1. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1995). Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgatta, E. F., Bales, R. F., & Couch, A. S. (1954). Some findings relevant to the great man theory of leadership. American Sociological Review, 19(6), 755–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Day, D. V. (2011). Integrative perspectives on longitudinal investigations of leader development: From childhood through adulthood. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 561–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Day, D. V., & Sin, H.-P. (2011). Longitudinal tests of an integrative model of leader development: Charting and understanding developmental trajectories. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 627–647.Google Scholar
  6. Dong, Y., Liao, H., Chuang, A., Zhou, J., & Campbell, E. M. (2015). Fostering employee service creativity: Joint effects of customer empowering behaviors and supervisory empowering leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1364–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erez, A., Misangyi, V. F., Johnson, D. E., LePine, M. A., & Halverson, K. C. (2008). Stirring the hearts of followers: Charismatic leadership as the transferal of affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 602–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Perfromance, 22, 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1434–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Podolny, J. M., Khurana, R., & Hill-Popper, M. (2004). Revisiting the meaning of leadership. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermier’s substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 380–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rost, J. C. (1991). Leadership in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  15. Schaumberg, R. L., & Flynn, F. J. (2012). Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown: The link between guilt proneness and leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Scott, B. A., Colquitt, J. A., Paddock, E. L., & Judge, T. A. (2010). A daily investigation of the role of manager empathy on employee well-being. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Strome College of BusinessOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA
  2. 2.East Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations