Collaborative Studio Experiences between South Korean and American Pre-Service Teachers: a Case Study of Designing Culturally-Responsive Virtual Classroom Simulation
Virtual classroom simulations can offer pre-service teachers unlimited opportunities for teaching practice that help them sensitize to classroom diversity. The purpose of this case study was to describe a collaborative simulation design studio initiated between two universities in South Korea and U.S.A. while American pre-service teachers visited South Korea for five days as part of the student exchange program. This paper presents the main components of the design studio program with detailed descriptions of design activities, in which South Korean and American pre-service teachers created four classroom management scenarios and corresponding virtual students/classrooms. We also shared how the design studio experiences helped participants understand different classroom cultures by analyzing their responses to the reflection questions, design outcomes, and the researchers’ observation notes. The results showed that the design studio experiences were beneficial for participants to understand different classroom cultures. The analyses revealed two major themes emerged from participants’ responses to cultural differences and similarities: classroom management and student attitude. In addition, participants shared perceived benefits of the collaborative design studio experiences: social engagement and tangible experiences.
KeywordsCollaborative design experience Culturally-responsive Pre-service teacher training Virtual classroom simulation
This research was supported by the University of South Florida Nexus Initiative Award.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
Sanghoon Park declares that he has no conflict of interest. Jeeheon Ryu declares that he has no conflict of interest. Kristen McChesney declares that she has no conflict of interest.
- Badiee, F., & Kaufman, D. (2014). The effectiveness of an online simulation for teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(2), 167–186.Google Scholar
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cruz, B. C. (2010). Difficult dialogues in the social studies education classroom: A model for diversity awareness and identity development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, Atlanta.Google Scholar
- Dieker, L. A., Rodruiguez, J. A., Lignugaris Kraft, B., Hynes, M. C., & Hughes, C. E. (2014). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: Current and future possibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413512683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Emmer, E. T., & Sabornie, E. J. (2015). Handbook of classroom management (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ferry, B., Kervin, L., Cambourne, B., Turbill, J., Puglisi, S., Jonassen, D., & Hedberg, J. (2004). Online classroom simulation: The “next wave” for pre-service teacher education? In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 294–302). Perth: Australian Society for Computers in learning in tertiary education.Google Scholar
- Ferry, B., Kervin, L., Hedberg, J. G., Turbill, J., Cambourne, B., & Jonassen, D. (2005). In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Communication (EdMedia) (pp. 3096–3103). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of computing in education (AACE).Google Scholar
- Gay, L. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching. Theory Research and Practice, 2, 1–44.Google Scholar
- Gollnick, D., & Chinn, P. (2002). Multicultural education in a pluralistic society (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Press-Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Howard, T. (2010). Why race and culture matter in schools: Closing the achievement gap in America’s classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Jang, I., & Jeon, K. (2013). A case study of elementary teachers’ multicultural education perception and practices. Multicultural Education Studies, 6(1), 73–103.Google Scholar
- Jones, V., & Jones, L. (1995). Comprehensive classroom management: Creating positive learning environments for all students (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Jones, V., & Jones, L. (2013). Comprehensive classroom management: Creating communities of support and solving problems (10th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Kolodner, J. (2006). Case-based reasoning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 225–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). Yes, but how do we do it? Practicing culturally relevant pedagogy. In J. Landsman & C. W. Lewis (Eds.), White teachers/diverse classrooms: A guide to building inclusive schools, promoting high expectations and eliminating racism (pp. 29–42). Sterling: Stylus Publishers.Google Scholar
- Lee, H. (2014). A narrative inquiry of in-service teachers’ perceptions and experiences in multicultural education. Theory and Practice of Education [Kyoyukui Ilonkwa Silcheon], 19(2), 75–95.Google Scholar
- MacSuga-Gage, A. S., Ennis, R. P., Hirsch, S. E., & Evanovich, L. (2018). Understanding and trumping behavioral concerns in the classroom. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(4), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2018.1456398.
- McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R. (2000). Designing learning environments for cultural inclusivity: A case study of indigenous online learning at tertiary level. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 58–72.Google Scholar
- Papert, S. (1991). Preface. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism, Research reports and essays, 1985–1990 (p. 1). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
- Park, S., & Ryu, J. (2019). Exploring preservice teachers’ emotional experiences in an immersive virtual teaching simulation through facial expression recognition. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(6), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1469710.
- Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2002). Scenario-based design. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Silverman, D. (2011). Interpreting qualitative data (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Vavrus, M. (2008). Culturally responsive teaching. In T. L. Good (Ed.), 21 st century education: A reference handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 49–57). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Wu, J. J. (2011). Multicultural awareness curriculum development for educator training with respect to ethnic attitudes toward new immigrants from Southeast Asia. Journal of Taipei Municipal University of Education: Education, 42(2), 157–188.Google Scholar