Advertisement

TechTrends

pp 1–6 | Cite as

Questioning the Myth of Ideation: Tatiana Chemi and the Hard Work of Creativity

  • Carmen Richardson
  • Danah HenriksenEmail author
  • The Deep-Play Research Group
Column: Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21st Century

Professional artists, professional creators, can’t just sit there and wait for a good idea to come.

~ Tatiana Chemi

Creativity is a by-product of hard work. If I never have another really new idea, it won’t matter.

~ Andy Rooney

Inspiration exists but it has to find you working.

~ Pablo Picasso

Introduction

In our current series of articles we have highlighted the scholarship of various creativity experts. Most recently we shared the work of Drs. Paula Thomson and Victoria Jacque who provided insight into the relationship between creativity, movement, and the physical body, with an eye toward creativity and wellness. In this article we extend our line of inquiry via a conversation with Dr. Tatiana Chemi, an associate professor at Aalborg University in Denmark. Originally from Italy, Dr. Chemi first began thinking about creativity as a theatre studies student at the University of Naples. She considers herself fortunate as an undergraduate to have belonged to a group that conducted...

Notes

References

  1. Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for" mini-c" creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chemi, T. (2018). A laboratory theatre approach to pedagogy and creativity: Odin Teatret and group learning. London: Palgrave/Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62788-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eckert, C., & Stacey, M. (1998). Fortune favours only the prepared mind: Why sources of inspiration are essential for continuing creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 7(1), 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glück, J., Ernst, R., & Unger, F. (2002). How creatives define creativity: Definitions reflect different types of creativity. Communication Research Journal, 14(1), 55–67.Google Scholar
  5. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.Google Scholar
  6. Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Deep-Play Research Group. (2017). Between structure and improvisation: A conversation on creativity as a social and collaborative behavior with Dr. Keith Sawyer. TechTrends, 61(1), 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Deep-Play Research Group. (2018). Creativity as invention, discovery, innovation and intuition: An interview with Dr. Richard Buchanan. TechTrends, 62(3), 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lebuda, I., Zabelina, D. L., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Mind full of ideas: A meta-analysis of the mindfulness–creativity link. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levin, R. A. (1991). The debate over schooling: Influences of Dewey and Thorndike. Childhood Education, 68(2), 71–75.Google Scholar
  10. Meyer, J. W., Rowan, B., & Meyer, M. W. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Nguyen, T. A., & Zeng, Y. (2012). A theoretical model of design creativity: Nonlinear design dynamics and mental stress-creativity relation. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 16(3), 65–88.Google Scholar
  12. Richards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity and the arts. World Futures, 63(7), 500–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Richardson, C., Henriksen, D., & Deep-Play Research Group. (2018). It’s not ‘hippies running barefoot through a field of daisies’ and other contemplations on creativity with Dr. Jonathan Plucker. TechTrends, 62(5), 432–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sarooghi, H., Libaers, D., & Birkemper, A. (2015). Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(2015), 714–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2011). Structure and improvisation in creative teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Simonton, D. K. (2012). Combinatorial creativity and sightedness: Monte Carlo simulations using three-criterion definitions. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 22(2), 5–18.Google Scholar
  18. Wagner, T. (2010). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don't teach the new survival skills our children need--and what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmen Richardson
    • 1
  • Danah Henriksen
    • 2
    Email author
  • The Deep-Play Research Group
  1. 1.Kamehameha SchoolsKeaʻauUSA
  2. 2.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations