A Needs Analysis to Inform Global Humanitarian Capacity Building
This article describes a needs analysis case study to inform the instructional design of a multinational capacity building project in humanitarian logistics. Survey responses from 106 foreign partner non-governmental organizations (NGOs) of international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) were collected to gain insights into organizations’ access to technology, levels of confidence in five logistics process areas, the strengths of previous capacity building projects, and organizational strategies and methods for capacity building. Results show that staff have access to mobile phones and computers and prefer to use the latter for learning. It was also found that not all NGOs implemented all the common logistics processes of an emergency response. Further, respondents preferred participatory approaches to scenario-based training over lecture-style presentations. Instructional design recommendations based on these results are shared as well as lessons learned which may help instructional designers working for multinational organizations design their needs analysis projects.
KeywordsNeeds analysis Cross-cultural design Non-governmental organizations Workplace learning Performance improvement Capacity building Humanitarian logistics
This project was funded by a consortium of ten INGOs and the European Union office for civil protection and humanitarian aid operations (ECHO). The consortium members were: Concern Worldwide, MercyCorps US, Save the Children International, Tearfund, World Vision International, and five Oxfam affiliates—Oxfam Great Britain, Oxfam Novib, Intermon Oxfam, Oxfam US, and Oxfam Australia.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
All authors were involved in an instructional design role in this project as employees of the Supply and Logistics Department of Oxfam Great Britain.
- Agg, C. (2006). Trends in government support for non-governmental organizations. “Golden age” of the NGO behind us. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
- Burde, D. (2004). International NGOs and best practices: The art of educational lending. In G. Steiner-Khamsi (Ed.), The global politics of educational borrowing and lending (pp. 173–187). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Cacciattolo, K. (2015). Defining workplace learning. European Scientific Journal, (May Special Edition), 1, 243–250.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, T. F. (1978). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Gitau, S., Marsden, G., & Donner, J. (2010, April). After access: Challenges facing mobile-only internet users in the developing world. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2603–2606). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
- Howard, C. D., Boling, E., Rowland, G., & Smith, K. M. (2012). Instructional design cases and why we need them. Educational Technology, 52(3), 34–38.Google Scholar
- Stolovitch, H. D., & Keeps, E. J. (2006). Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, and potential. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Thomas, A. S. & Kopczak, L. R. (2005). From logistics to supply chain management: The Path forward in the humanitarian sector. [White paper]. San Francisco: Fritz Institute. Retrieved from http://www.fritzinstitute.org/pdfs/whitepaper/fromlogisticsto.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2018.
- UNISDR. (2017). Terminology. Retrieved from https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology. Accessed 2 July 2018.
- Van Tiem, D., Moseley, J. L., & Dessinger, J. C. (2005). Fundamentals of performance improvement: Optimizing results through people, process, and organizations (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Van Tiem, D., Moseley, J. L., & Dessinger, J. C. (2012). Fundamentals of performance improvement: Optimizing results through people, process, and organizations (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Young, P. A. (2008). The culture based model: Constructing a model of culture. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 107–118.Google Scholar