Advertisement

TechTrends

, Volume 63, Issue 4, pp 408–419 | Cite as

Social Presence in an Online Professional Conference

  • Luisa F. Castro
Original Paper

Abstract

This article is a report of a transcript content analysis of participants in six presentation sessions at the 21st Annual Teaching Colleges and Community Worldwide Online Conference. The study was conducted in order to examine the role of social presence in an online professional conference. How participants conveyed social presence and how it influenced their conference experience were explored. The results suggest that social presence can be established in a shorter time frame than previously thought possible compared to online courses conducted over a semester or term. Participants participating in online presentations lasting 20 to 45 min were able to project observable instances of social presence with two new indicators being manifested that were not previously in the literature.

Keywords

Professional online conference Community of Inquiry Social presence Online learning 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Human and Animal Studies

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Anderson, S. (2011). Seductive Interaction Design: Creating Playful, Fun, and Effective User Experiences (1st ed.). New Riders. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Seductive-Interaction-Design-Effective-Experiences/dp/0321725522
  2. Anderson, L., & Anderson, T. (2009). Online professional development conferences: An effective, economical and eco-friendly option. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La Revue Canadienne de L’apprentissage et de La Technologie, 35(2) Retrieved from http://cjlt.csj.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/521. Accessed 20 April 2013
  3. Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 73–85.Google Scholar
  4. Arbaugh, B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2).Google Scholar
  5. Beach, M., Coates, S., Hinton, C., & Montoya, D. (2013). By design: Building Trust in Virtual Teams. Shared Knowledge Conference Journal, 1(1) Retrieved from https://ejournals.unm.edu/index.php/nmskc/article/view/3028. Accessed 2 Sept 2016.
  6. Bell, S. (2011). A conference wherever you are. Retrieved from http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2011/10/featured/a-conference-wherever-you-are/#_. Accessed 24 Oct 2015.
  7. Boyle, J. (2013). Are virtual education conferences worth the time and effort? Retrieved from http://www.emergingedtech.com/2013/09/are-virtual-education-conferences-worth-the-time-and-effort/
  8. Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1–32.Google Scholar
  9. Cherrstrom, C. A. (2012). Making connections: Attending professional conferences. Adult Learning, 23(3), 148–152.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159512452263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Covey, S. R. (2004). The 7 habits of highly effective people: Powerful lessons in personal change. New York: Free Press Retrieved from https://www.stephencovey.com/7habits/7habits.php. Accessed 5 Sept 2016.
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Dikkers, A. G., Whiteside, A., & Lewis, S. (2012). Get present: Build community and connectedness online. Learning & Leading with Technology, 40(2), 22–25.Google Scholar
  13. Dumitru, D. (2012). Communities of inquiry. A method to teach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 238–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Futris, T. G., Adler-Baeder, F., & Dean, K. J. (2004). Using technology to link researchers and educators: Evaluation of electronic conferencing. Journal of Extension, 42(1) Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/2004february/rb1.php. Accessed 24 Aug 2015.
  15. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105 Retrieved from http://cde.athabascau.ca/coi_site/documents/Garrison_Anderson_Archer_Critical_Inquiry_model.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2015.
  16. Gunawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2003). Distance education. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook for research on educational communications and technology (pp. 355–396). New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1998). Transcript analysis of computer-mediated conferences as a tool for testing constructivist and social-constructivist learning theories. In Distance Learning 1998 (pp. 139–145). Madison, WI. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED422854. Accessed 26 June 2014
  19. Gunawardena, C., Carabajal, K. & Lowe, C.A. (2001). Critical analysis of models and methods used to evaluate online learning networks. Presented at American Educational Research Association annual meeting 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 117–136). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-642-77684-7_8. Accessed 13 Sept 2015.
  21. Heuer, B. P., & King, K. P. (2004). Leading the band: The role of the instructor in online learning for educators. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(1).Google Scholar
  22. Ho, C. P., Kimura, B., & Narita, S. (2006). Evolution of a virtual worldwide conference on online teaching. Proceedings from Distance Learning and the Internet 2006, annual conference for the Association for Pacific Rim Universities, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  23. Kanuka, H., Rourke, L., & Laflamme, E. (2007). The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 260–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim, I., & Kuljis, J. (2011). Applying content analysis to web-based content. CIT. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 18(4), 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimura, B., & Ho, C. (2008). Online conferences and workshops: Affordable & ubiquitous learning opportunities for faculty development. Proceedings from distance learning and the internet conference 2008 (pp. 61–65). Retrieved from http://www.waseda.jp/DLI2008/program/proceedings/pdf/session3-1.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2015.
  26. Kimura, B., & Shimabukuro, J. (2001). The teaching in the community colleges (TCC) online conference. LeagueTLC Innovation Express. Retrieved from http://www.league.org/leaguetlc/express/inn0107.htm. Accessed 27 Aug 2015.
  27. Lin, G. Y., Laffey, J. M. (2004). Effects of different activity types and time on online social presence (Vol. 2004, pp. 1996–2000). Presented at the E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/11615/. Accessed 5 Sept 2016.
  28. Lowenthal, P. R. (2012). Social presence: What is it? How do we measure it? University of Colorado at Denver Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/35/06/3506428.html. Accessed 15 Nov 2015.
  29. Lowenthal, P. R., & Lowenthal, A. (2010). A mixed methods examination of instructor social presence in accelerated online courses. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  30. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Retrieved from http://npu.edu.ua/!e-book/book/djvu/A/iif_kgpm_Mackey_Second%20Language%20Methodology%20and%20Design.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2016.
  31. Malik, K. (2011). Virtual research conferences: A case based analysis. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking, 3(4), 32–45.  https://doi.org/10.4018/jvcsn.2011100103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mancuso, D., Chlup, D., & McWhorter, R. R. (2010). A study of adult learning in a virtual world. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12(6), 681–699.Google Scholar
  33. Mayne, L. A., & Wu, Q. (2011). Creating and measuring social presence in online graduate nursing courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 110–114.  https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-32.2.110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McWhorter, R., Mancuso, D., & Roberts, P. B. (2014). Exploring professional online conferences for the adult learner. In J. K. Holtz, S. B. Springer, & C. J. Boden-McGill (Eds.), Developing and sustaining adult learners (pp. 267–281). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Mehrabian, A. (1968). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1(6), 203–207.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Minshull, G. (2006). Evaluation report highlights, innovating e-learning 2006 online conference. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/evaluation%20highlights%20innovating%20e-learning%202006.doc. Accessed 19 Nov 2015.
  37. Murphrey, T. P., & Coppernoll, S. (2006). Facilitating the adoption of an online conferencing system--a recipe for success. Journal of Extension, 44(3) Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/2006june/iw1.php. Accessed 24 Aug 2015.
  38. Murray, D. L. (2002). Keeping pace: The dance of online conferencing. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 16(4), 22–25.Google Scholar
  39. Newman, D. R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 3(2), 56–11 Retrieved from http://www.helsinki.fi/science/optek/1995/n2/newman.txt. Accessed 25 Sept 2015.
  40. Oualha, L., & Matula, T. (2009). The potential of online academic conferences to increase faculty interaction in a networked world. European Journal of Management, 9(4), N/A.Google Scholar
  41. Pollard, H., Minor, M., & Swanson, A. (2014). Instructor social presence within the community of inquiry framework and its impact on classroom community and the learning environment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 17(2), N/A.Google Scholar
  42. Ravn, I. (2007). The learning conference. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(3), 212–222.  https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590710739287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Richardson, J. C., Koehler, A. A., Besser, E. D., Caskurlu, S., Lim, J., & Mueller, C. M. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3) Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2123. Accessed 4 Sept 2016.
  44. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education / Revue de L’ducation Distance, 14(2), 50–71.Google Scholar
  45. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14. Retrieved from http://auspace.athabascau.ca/bitstream/2149/732/1/Assessing%20Social%20Presence%20In%20Asynchronous%20Text-based%20Computer%20Conferencing.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2015.
  46. Ruedenberg, L., Danet, B., & Rosenbaum-Tamari, Y. (1995). Virtual virtuosos: Play and performance at the computer keyboard. Electronic Journal of Communication, 4(4) Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v4n23494.htm. Accessed 1 Sept 2016.
  47. Shea, P., Hayes, S., & Vickers, J. (2010). Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: A re-examination of measures and approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Siemens, G., Tittenberger, P., & Anderson, T. (2008). Conference connections: Rewiring the circuit. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0820.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2013.
  49. Stone, S. J., & Chapman, D. D. (2006). Instructor Presence in the Online Classroom. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED492845. Accessed 10 Jan 2016.
  50. Suter, V., Alexander, B., & Kaplan, P. (2005). Social software and the future of conferences right now. Educause Review, 40(1), 46–59 Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0513.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2013.
  51. Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2(1), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.Google Scholar
  53. Swan, K., Garrison, D. R., & Richardson, J. (2009). A constructivist approach to online learning: The community of inquiry framework. In C. R. Payne (Ed.), Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 43–57). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tu, C. H. (2000). On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23(1), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tu, C. H., & Corry, M. (2004). Online discussion durations impact online social presence (Vol. 2004, pp. 3073–3077). Presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/13320/. Accessed 5 Sept 2016.
  56. Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. S. (2002). An examination of social presence to increase interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang, Y. (1999). Online conference: A participant’s perspective. The Journal, 26(8), 70.Google Scholar
  58. Whiteside, A. L. (2007). Exploring social presence in communities of practice within a hybrid learning environment: A longitudinal examination of two case studies within the school technology leadership graduate -level certificate program. University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/32/75/3275052.html. Accessed 17 Nov 2015.
  59. Whiteside, A. L. (2015). Introducing the social presence model to explore online and blended learning experiences. Online Learning Journal, 19(2). Retrieved from http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/453. Accessed 2 Sept 2015.
  60. Wickersham, L. E., & Dooley, K. E. (2006). A content analysis of critical thinking skills as an indicator of quality of online discussion in virtual learning communities. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(2), 185–193.Google Scholar
  61. Wolcott, L. L. (1996) Distant, but not distanced: A learner-centered approach to distance education. TechTrends, 41(5), 23–27Google Scholar
  62. Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts Retrieved from https://books.google.com. Accessed 18 Nov 2015.

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HiloUSA

Personalised recommendations