pp 1–9 | Cite as

Student Perceptions on the Role of the Classroom Environment on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning

  • Tutaleni I. AsinoEmail author
  • Alana Pulay
Original Paper


The physical classroom remains the one constant space where most schooling takes place and where everyday Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) practices in formal educational settings occur. While educational advocates have championed the need for a change to schooling, pedagogy and various teaching and learning practices, the learning environment where these activities are taking place especially at the university level remain the same year after year, creating challenges for those attempting to implement CSCL. In this paper we argue that we cannot improve learning without looking at how the physical classroom space and furniture layout is designed and its impact on learning. Given that the CSCL research emphasizes social interactions, collaboration and knowledge growth, all of which should be occurring in the classroom, it seems appropriate to look at classroom space and changing pedagogies.


Classroom furniture Collaborative technology use Learning environments Physical classroom space 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that he/she has no conflict of interest.


  1. Baeta, P. & Pedro,N. (2017). Future Classrooms: Analysis of Educational Activities Developed by Teachers And Students. In ICERI2017 Proceedings 10th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (pp. 130–139).Google Scholar
  2. Brown, M., & Long, P. (2006). Trends in learning space design. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces (9.19.11). Boulder, CO: Educase.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chism, N. (2006). Challenging Traditional Assumptions and Rethinking Learning Spaces. In D.G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces, EDUCAUSE,
  5. Chism, N., & Bickford, D. (2002). Improving the environment for learning: an expanded agenda. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(92), 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cinar, I. (2010). Classroom geography: who sit where in the traditional classrooms? Journal of International Social Research, 3(10), 201–212.Google Scholar
  7. Çubukçu, Z. (2012). Teachers’ evaluation of student-centered learning environments. Education, 133(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  8. Eiland, L. S. (2018). Student perceptions of active-learning strategies utilized in a drugs in pregnancy elective delivered synchronously across multiple campuses. TechTrends, 1–7.Google Scholar
  9. Espey, M. (2008). Does space matter? Classroom design and team-based learning. Review of agricultural Economics, 30(4), 764–775.Google Scholar
  10. Fernandes, A. C., Huang, J., & Rinaldo, V. (2011). Does Where A Student Sits Really Matter?-The Impact of Seating Locations on Student Classroom Learning. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 10(1).Google Scholar
  11. Folkins, J., Friberg, J., & Cesarini, P. (2015). University classroom design principles to facilitate learning: the instructor as advocate. Planning for Higher Education Journal, 43(2), 45–62.Google Scholar
  12. Fraser, B. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. Springer international handbooks of education (Vol. 24). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fraser, B., Anderson, G., & Walber, H. (1982). Assessment of learning environments: manual or learning environment inventory (LEI) and my class inventory (MCI). Third Version. US Department of Education, 63.Google Scholar
  14. Haghighi, M., & Jusan, M. (2015). The impact of classroom settings on students’ seat-selection and academic performance. Indoor and Built Environment, 24(2), 280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hannafin, M. J. (2012). Student-centered learning. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 3211–3214). Springer US.Google Scholar
  16. Hansen, E. J., & Stephens, J. A. (2000). The ethics of learner-centered education: dynamics that impede the process. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(5), 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  18. Izuagba, A. C., Afurobi, A., Nwigwe, N. V., & Okonkwo, A. (2018). Effects of creating physical learning spaces on the reading comprehension skills performance of primary four pupils. AFRREV LALIGENS: An International Journal of Language, Literature and Gender Studies, 7(1), 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jonassen, D.H., & Easter, M.A. (2012). Conceptual change and student-centered learning environments. Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, 95–113.Google Scholar
  20. Jover, J. M. N., & Ramírez, J. A. M. (2018). Academic performance, class attendance and seating location of university students in practical lectures. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaya, N., & Burgess, B. (2007). Territoriality: Seat preferences in different types of classroom arrangements. Environment and Behavior, 39(6), 859–876.Google Scholar
  22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Matsushita, K., Matsushita, K., & Hasebe. (2018). Deep Active Learning. Springer.Google Scholar
  24. McGowan, A., Hanna, P., Greer, D., & Busch, J. (2017). Learning to Program: Choose Your Lecture Seat Carefully!. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 4-9). ACM.Google Scholar
  25. Mcvay, G. J., Murphy, P. R., & Wook Yoon, S. (2008). Good practices in accounting education: classroom configuration and technological tools for enhancing the learning environment. Accounting Education: an International Journal, 17(1), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murthy, S., Warriem, J. M., & Iyer, S. (2017). Technology integration for student-centered learning: A model for teacher professional development programs. In Emerging practices in scholarship of learning and teaching in a digital era (pp. 55–74). Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar
  27. Neuman, W. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson Eeducation, Inc..Google Scholar
  28. P21. (2007). P21 Framework for 21st Century Learning [Online image]. Retrieved from
  29. Park, E., & Choi, B. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: traditional versus active learning classrooms in college. Higher Education, 68, 749–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parker, T., Hoopes, O., & Eggett, D. (2011). The effect of seat location and movement or permanence on student-initiated participation. College teaching, 59(2), 79–84.Google Scholar
  31. Sanders, M. J. (2013). Classroom design and student engagement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 496–500). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Sawant, S. P., & Rizvi, S. (2015). Study of passive didactic teacher centered approach and an active student centered approach in teaching anatomy. International Journal of Anatomy and Research, 3, 1192–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shapiro, W. L., Roskos, K., & Cartwright, G. P. (1995). Technology: technology-enhanced learning environments. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 67–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, S. A. (2004). Designing collaborative learning experiences for library computer classrooms. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 11(2), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steelcase. (2016). Technology-empowered learning: Six spatial insights. White Papers, 1–6.Google Scholar
  36. Thomas, C. L., Pavlechko, G. M., & Cassady, J. C. (2018). An examination of the mediating role of learning space design on the relation between instructor effectiveness and student engagement. Learning Environments Research, 1–15.Google Scholar
  37. Van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. (2007). Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 175–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wesch, M. (2008). A Vision of Students Today (& What Teachers Must Do) Retrieved from
  39. Yang, Z., Becerik-Gerber, B., & Mino, L. (2013). A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms: impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance. Building and Environment, 70, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Technology, School of Educational Foundations, Leadership and Aviation, College of Education, Health and AviationOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Design, Housing and MerchandisingOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA

Personalised recommendations