Advertisement

TechTrends

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Maker’s Workshop: a Framework to Support Learning through Making

  • Rachel Kaminski Sanders
  • Theodore J. Kopcha
  • Kalianne L. Neumann
  • Kristin Brynteson
  • Carrie Bishop
Original Paper

Abstract

Making and makerspaces are currently an exciting topic in education. The constructionist nature of learning through making, however, creates an inherent tension for teachers – one where the need to meet specific standards must be balanced with the open-ended, creative problem-solving that making supports. Unlike the traditional teacher-centered approach to English Language Arts instruction, the Writer’s Workshop is a process-oriented approach to writing nationally recognized as a student-centered environment that balances that tension. This paper draws on the research around the existing framework of Writer’s Workshop to create a new framework for supporting the learning that takes place in a makerspace environment. The framework, called Maker’s Workshop, offers a process for upholding constructionist approaches to learning while meeting Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) standards. To demonstrate the framework in action, we present the case of STEM Read at Northern Illinois University (NIU). The paper provides scholars and practitioners a guide for teaching and learning while also suggesting opportunities for research.

Keywords

Interdisciplinary instruction Makerspaces STEM education Writer’s workshop 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning through STEM-rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Science Education, 99(1), 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowler, L. (2014). Creativity through “maker” experiences and design thinking in the education of librarians. Knowledge Quest, 42(5), 59–61.Google Scholar
  4. Calkins, L. (1987). The writing workshop: A world of difference. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
  5. Calkins, L. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  6. Chu, S. L., Quek, F., Bhangaonkar, S., Ging, A. B., & Sridharamurthy, K. (2015). Making the maker: A means-to-an-ends approach to nurturing the maker mindset in elementary-aged children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clapp, E. P., Ross, J., Ryan, J. O., & Tishman, S. (2017). Maker-centered learning: Empowering young people to shape their worlds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Clippard, D., & Nicaise, M. (1998). Efficacy of writers' workshop for students with significant writing deficits. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13(1), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J., Jones, W. M., Smith, S., & Calandra, B. (2016). Makification: Towards a framework for leveraging the maker movement in formal education. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (pp. 129–135). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  10. Culham, R. (2010). Traits of writing: The complete guide for middle school. New York: Scholastic Inc..Google Scholar
  11. De Bono, E. (2002). Tactics: The art and science of success. London: Profile Books Limited.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, L., & Marsh, J. (2007). Getting started: The reading-writing workshop, grades 4–8. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  13. Fletcher, R., & Portalupi, J. (2001). Writing workshop: The essential guide. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  14. Gallagher, K. (2006). Teaching adolescent writers. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
  16. Graves, D. H., & Kittle, P. (2005). My quick writes: For inside writing. Portsmouth: Heinemann Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Graves, D. H., Tuyay, S., & Green, J. (2004). What I've learned from teachers of writing. Language Arts, 82(2), 88–94.Google Scholar
  18. Hachem, A., Nabhani, M., & Bahous, R. (2008). “We can write!” the writing workshop for young learners. Education 3–13, 36(4), 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamel, F. L. (2017). Choice and agency in the writing workshop: Developing engaged writers, grades 4–6. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  21. He changed how children are taught to write: Tom Newkirk publishes book on pioneering work of Donald Graves. (2013, May 23). UNH Today. Retrieved from https://www.unh.edu/unhtoday/2013/05/he-changed-how-children-are-taught-write
  22. Honey, M., & Kanter, D. E. (Eds.). (2013). Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hsu, Y. C., Baldwin, S., & Ching, Y. H. (2017). Learning through making and maker education. TechTrends, 61(2), 589–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jasmine, J., & Weiner, W. (2007). The effects of writing workshop on abilities of first grade students to become confident and independent writers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(2), 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaminski, R., Hunt-Barron, S., Hawkins, D., & Williams, H. (2010). Evaluating project WRITE: Determining the impact of a professional development program focusing on a writing workshop approach and the traits of quality writing. Retrieved from https://www.nwp.org/cs/public/download/nwp_file/15445/LSRI_Evaluating_Project_Write_2008_2009_Upstate_Report.pdf?x-r=pcfile_d
  26. Kittle, P. (2008). Write beside them: Risk, voice, and clarity in high school writing. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
  27. Kurti, R. S., Kurti, D. L., & Fleming, L. (2014a). The philosophy of educational makerspaces: Part 1 of making an educational makerspace. Teacher Librarian, 41(5), 8–11.Google Scholar
  28. Kurti, R. S., Kurti, D., & Fleming, L. (2014b). The environment and tools of great educational makerspaces: Part 2 of making an educational makerspace. Teacher Librarian, 42(1), 8–12.Google Scholar
  29. Lensmire, T. (1994). When children write: Critical re-visions of the writing workshop. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lensmire, T. (1997). The teacher as Dostoevskian novelist. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(3), 367–392.Google Scholar
  31. Lysaker, J. T., Wheat, J., & Benson, E. (2010). Children’s spontaneous play in writer’s workshop. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(2), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maloy, R., Trust, T., Kommers, S., Malinowski, A., & LaRoche, I. (2017). 3D modeling and printing in history/social studies classrooms: Initial lessons and insights. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(2), 229–249.Google Scholar
  33. Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1).Google Scholar
  34. Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. S. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.Google Scholar
  35. McCarthey, S. J. (2002). Students' identities and literacy learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core state standards English language arts. Washington: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
  37. National Writing Project, & Nagin, C. (2003). Because writing matters: Improving student writing in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  39. Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Preface. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism: Research reports and essays, 1985–1990 (p. 1). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  40. Peyton, J. K., Jones, C., Vincent, A., & Greenblatt, L. (1994). Implementing writing workshop with ESOL students: Visions and realities. TESOL Quarterly, 28(3), 469–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pollington, M. F., Wilcox, B., & Morrison, T. G. (2001). Self-perception in writing: The effects of writing workshop and traditional instruction on intermediate grade students. Reading Psychology, 22(4), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ray, K. W. (2002). What you know by heart: How to develop curriculum for your writing workshop. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  43. Rogers, M. A. P., Cross, D. I., Gresalfi, M. S., Trauth-Nare, A. E., & Buck, G. A. (2011). First-year implementation of a project-based learning approach: The need for addressing teachers’ orientations in the era of reform. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(4), 893–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spandel, V. (2005). The 9 rights of every writer: A guide for teachers. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  46. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  47. Stockman, A. (2016). Make writing: 5 teaching strategies that turn writer’s workshop into a maker space. Cleveland: Times 10 Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Tamim, S. R., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Definitions and uses: Case study of teachers implementing project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 72–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tekkumru-Kisa, M., Stein, M. K., & Schunn, C. (2015). A framework for analyzing cognitive demand and content-practices integration: Task analysis guide in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 659–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wallace, S., Banks, T., Sedas, M., Glazweski, K., Brush, T. A., & McKay, C. (2017). What will keep the fish alive? Exploring intersections of designing, making, and inquiry among middle school learners. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 8(1), 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel Kaminski Sanders
    • 1
  • Theodore J. Kopcha
    • 2
  • Kalianne L. Neumann
    • 3
  • Kristin Brynteson
    • 4
  • Carrie Bishop
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of South Carolina UpstateSpartanburgUSA
  2. 2.Learning, Design, and TechnologyThe University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  3. 3.Educational TechnologyOklahoma State UniversityStillwaterUSA
  4. 4.Center for P-20 EngagementNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalbUSA

Personalised recommendations