Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Cross-cultural Dialogues in an Open Online Course: Navigating National and Organizational Cultural Differences

Abstract

This study examines the interactions of educators and instructional designers during a four-week open online professional development course about using social media in education. Discourse analysis was used to elucidate points where national and organizational cultural differences arose, noting whether and how learners expressed and bridged differences. Findings suggest that the learners first identified with their national culture, and then, if they did not experience any cultural challenges, began to explore topics related to organizational culture. In this course, Chinese students were most likely to experience national cultural challenges, and Western participants were most likely to raise organizational culture issues. Language and national political climate also played a role in how and what learners expressed in an online learning environment. Flexible course design and facilitation can be used to help make learners from all cultural backgrounds feel more comfortable and engage in cross-cultural sharing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Cultural impacts on e-learning systems' success. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.06.003.

  2. Arenas-Gaitán, J., Ramírez-Correa, P. E., & Rondán-Cataluña, F. J. (2011). Cross cultural analysis of the use and perceptions of web based learning systems. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1762–1774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.016.

  3. Boven, D. (2013). The next game changer: The historical antecedents of the MOOC movement in education. E-learning papers, 33, 1–7.

  4. Chen, R. T.-H., & Bennett, S. (2012). When Chinese learners meet constructivist pedagogy online. Higher Education, 64(3), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9520-9.

  5. Cronjé, J. C. (2011). Using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions to interpret cross-cultural blended teaching and learning. Computers & Education, 56(3), 596–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.021.

  6. Dennen, V., & Bong, J. (2015). Behind the scenes of an independent MOOC: Instructional design problems and solutions. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 9(1), 25–31.

  7. Fernandez, D. R., Carlson, D. S., Stepina, L. P., & Nicholson, J. D. (1997). Hofstede's country classification 25 years later. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595412.

  8. de Freitas, S. I., Morgan, J., & Gibson, D. (2015). Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 455–471.

  9. Gover, L., Halinski, M., & Duxbury, L. (2016). Is it just me? Exploring perceptions of organizational culture change. British Journal of Management, 27(3), 567–582.

  10. Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13(1–2), 46–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1983.11656358.

  11. Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5.

  12. Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286–316.

  13. Jackson, S. (2011). Organizational culture and information systems adoption: A three-perspective approach. Information and Organization, 21, 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.03.003.

  14. Jasimuddin, S. M., & Hasan, I. (2015). Organizational culture, structure, technology infrastructure and knowledge sharing. Vine, 45(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/VINE-05-2014-0037.

  15. Kang, H., & Chang, B. (2016). Examining culture's impact on the learning behaviors of international students from Confucius culture studying in Western online learning context. Journal of International Students, 6(3), 779–797.

  16. Kim, Y., Sohn, D., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 365–372.

  17. Leidner, D. E., & Kayworth, T. (2006). A review of culture in information systems research. Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 357–399.

  18. Lewin, T. (2012). Instruction for masses knocks down campus walls. New York Times.

  19. Milheim, K. L. (2014). Facilitation across cultures in the online classroom. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 5(1). Available online at: https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/66.

  20. Phirangee, K., & Malec, A. (2017). Othering in online learning: an examination of social presence, identity, and sense of community. Distance Education, 38(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322457.

  21. Psathas, G. (1999). Studying the organization in action: Membership categorization and interaction analysis. Human Studies, 22(2/4), 139–162.

  22. Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2015). Digital equity and intercultural education. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 743–756.

  23. Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007.

  24. Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2012). Networked participatory scholarship: Emergent techno-cultural pressures toward open and digital scholarship in online networks. Computers & Education, 58, 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.001.

  25. Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2013). Scholars and faculty members’ lived experiences in online social networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 43–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.01.004.

  26. Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Cross-cultural analysis of users' attitudes toward the use of mobile devices in second and foreign language learning in higher education: A case from Sweden and China. Computers & Education, 69, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.014.

  27. Yuen, A. H., Park, J. H., Chen, L., & Cheng, M. (2017). Digital equity in cultural context: exploring the influence of Confucian heritage culture on Hong Kong families. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 481–501.

  28. Zhang, J. (2010). Technology-supported learning innovation in cultural contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9137-6.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Vanessa P. Dennen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the researchers’ Institutional Review Board, and all procedures involving human participants were in accordance with these ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

Vanessa Dennen declares that she has no conflicts of interest. Jiyae Bong declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dennen, V.P., Bong, J. Cross-cultural Dialogues in an Open Online Course: Navigating National and Organizational Cultural Differences. TechTrends 62, 383–392 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0276-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • online discussion
  • online learning
  • MOOC
  • national culture
  • organizational culture
  • social media