Advertisement

TechTrends

, Volume 62, Issue 2, pp 146–151 | Cite as

A Case Study of the Implementation of Social Models of Teaching in e-Learning: “The Social Networks in Education”, Online Course of the Inter-Orthodox Centre of the Church of Greece

  • Ioanna Komninou
Original Paper

Abstract

The development of e-learning has caused a growing interest in learning models that may have the best results. We believe that it is good practice to implement social learning models in the field of online education. In this case, the implementation of complex instruction in online training courses for teachers, on “Social Networks in Education” from the Inter-Orthodox Center of the Church of Greece is examined. To study the effectiveness of this model we gathered qualitative and quantitative data from learner participation in forums and wikis, and in additional social networks in which they chose to practice. Important data also was collected from the evaluation made by the learners themselves.

Keywords

Instructional design Social learning models Teachers training Web based training 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank my partners, the team of e-learning experts: Mary Frentzou, Christos Nassios, Eleni Athanassiou, Georgia Tsiga, Zacharoula Charpantidou and John Bakas.

References

  1. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  2. Aragon, S. R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bofiliou, A. (2013). Interactions in online environments. Patra: Hellenic Open University.Google Scholar
  4. Bouhnik, D., & Marcus, T. (2006). Interaction in distance-learning courses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, E. (1986). Designing group work strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gagne, R., Briggs, L., & Wager, W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth: HBJ College Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Gunawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2004). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 355–395). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Hedley, S. (2005). Five roles I play in online courses. Innovate: Journal of online education. Retrieved February 11, 2016, from, http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol2_issue1/Five_Roles_I_Play_in_Online_Courses.pdf.
  9. Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner – Interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holmes, K. (2005). Analysis of asynchronous online discussion using the solo taxonomy. Australian Journal of Educational & Development Psychology, 5, 117–127.Google Scholar
  11. Nisbet, D. (2004). Measuring the quantity and quality of online discussion group interaction. Journal of eLiteracy, 1, 122–139.Google Scholar
  12. Picciano, A. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
  13. Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.Google Scholar
  14. Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  15. Tu, C.-H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Uzumer, S. (2007). Educationally valuable talk: A new concept for determining the quality of online conversations. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 400–410.Google Scholar
  17. Waterhouse, S., & Rogers, R. O. (2004). The importance of policies in E-learning instruction. Educause Quarterly, 3, 28–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioanna Komninou
    • 1
  1. 1.AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations