The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) Model: a Critical Review and Suggestions for its Use
The Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) model is a four-level, taxonomy-based approach for selecting, using, and evaluating technology in K-12 settings (Puentedura 2006). Despite its increasing popularity among practitioners, the SAMR model is not currently represented in the extant literature. To focus the ongoing conversation regarding K-12 educators’ understanding and implementation of technology, we provide a critical review of the SAMR model using theory and prior research. We focus on the absence of context, its hierarchical structure, and the emphasis placed on product over process and conclude with suggestions to guide educators’ and researchers’ technology integration efforts.
KeywordsSAMR Technology integration k-12 technology School technology implementation
- Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition. White Plains: Longman.Google Scholar
- Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives (Vol. 1). New York: McKay.Google Scholar
- Branch, R. M., & Merrill, M. D. (2012). Characteristics of instructional design models. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed., pp. 8–16). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Brubaker, J. (2013). SAMR: Model, metaphor, mistakes. Retrieved from http://techtipsedu.blogspot.com/2013/11/samr-model-metaphor-mistakes.html.
- Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (2005). The compensatory effectiveness of the Quicktionary Reading Pen II® on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(1), 31–40.Google Scholar
- Hooker, C. (2014). SAMR swimming lessons. Retrieved from http://hookedoninnovation.com/2014/08/01/samr-swimming-lessons/.
- Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 277–302.Google Scholar
- Inserra, A., & Short, T. (2012). An analysis of high school math, science, social studies, English, and foreign language teachers’ implementation of one-to-one computing and their pedagogical practices. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 41, 145–169. doi: 10.2190/et.41.2.d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Society for Technology in Education. (2015). ISTE standards. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards.
- Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Technology and Innovation (Ed.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3–29). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Koehler, M., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101–111). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lei, J., Conway, P. F., & Zhao, Y. (2008). The digital pencil: One-to-one computing for children. Mawhaw: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Ligas, M. R. (2002). Evaluation of broward county alliance of quality schools project. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 7(2), 117–139. doi: 10.1207/S15327671ESPR0702_2.
- Linderoth, J. (2013). Open letter to Dr. Ruben Puentedura [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://spelvetenskap.blogspot.com/2013/10/open-letter-to-dr-ruben-puentedura.html.
- Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., & Kalman, H. (2010). Designing effective instruction. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Morsink, P. M., Hagerman, M. S., Heintz, A., Boyer, M. D., Harris, R., Kereluik, K., et al. (2011). Professional development to support TPACK technology integration: the initial learning trajectories of thirteen fifth and sixth grade educators. Journal of Education, 191(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Pearson, P. D., Ferdig, R. E., Blomeyer, R. L., Jr., & Moran, J. (2005). The effects of technology on reading performance in the middle-school grades: A meta-analysis with recommendations for policy. Naperville: Learning Point Associates.Google Scholar
- Pepe, C. [Device Smashing Diva]. (2014). SAMR Wheel of Fortune [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1s0quYx53PI.
- Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/.
- Puentedura, R. (2014a). Building transformation: An introduction to the SAMR model [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/08/22/BuildingTransformation_AnIntroductionToSAMR.pdf.
- Puentedura, R. (2014b). Learning, technology, and the SAMR model: Goals, processes, and practice [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/06/29/LearningTechnologySAMRModel.pdf.
- Reiser, R. A. (2012). What field did you say you were in? Defining and naming our field. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed., pp. 1–7). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2012). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Russell, J. D., Sorge, D., & Brickner, D. (1994). Improving technology implementation in grades5-12 with the ASSURE model. The Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 21(9), 66–70. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/p1140/t-h-e-journaltechnological-horizons-in-education.Google Scholar
- Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. (2005). Do technologies make us smarter? Intellectual amplification with, of, and through technology. In R. J. Sternberg & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 69–86). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Sherin, M., & van Es, E. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 475–491.Google Scholar
- Tabak, I. (2013). Lights, camera, learn: When the set is as important as the actors. In R. Luckin, S. Puntambekar, P. Goodyear, B. L. Grabowski, J. Underwood, & N. Winters (Eds.), Handbook of design in educational technology (pp. 397–405). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Urdan, T. (1999). The role of context. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
- Xin, J. F., & Rieth, H. (2001). Video-assisted vocabulary instruction for elementary school students with learning disabilities. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 87–104.Google Scholar