Advertisement

TechTrends

, Volume 60, Issue 4, pp 392–397 | Cite as

Use of Fitness Bands by Teachers in the Classroom

  • Jeff Ertzberger
  • Florence Martin
Original Paper

Abstract

Wearable technologies are increasingly gaining attention. Gadgets such as Smartwatch, Fitband, Google Glass, and similar healthcare devices can be worn by the consumer and have several benefits in various contexts. This study examined teachers perception on fitness bands and if they have any benefits to classroom teachers. 28 classroom teachers were each given a fitness band for 35 days. Prior to giving them the fitness band, a pre-survey was administered. At the end of the 35 day period a post-survey was administered. Ninety-three percent of the teachers completed both the post and pre-survey in which they responded to change in teacher motivation and teaching practices due to wearing the fitness band. There were also four open ended questions that addressed benefits and challenges of using the fitness band in educational contexts. This study has implications for those considering using fitness band in an educational setting.

Keywords

Fitness bands Wearable technology Teachers Motivation Teaching practices 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study was funded by Institute for Emerging Issues, NC State University. Grant Titled “Beginning Teachers Matter”.

References

  1. Adams, C. (2012). Teachers in training. The Scholastic Administrator, 12, 46–49.Google Scholar
  2. Brunsell, E., & Horejsi, M. (2010). GeoEverything: the magic carpet. The Science Teacher, 77(6), 12.Google Scholar
  3. Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web or internet based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eakin, E., Mummery, K., Reeves, M., Lawler, S., Schofield, G., Marshall, A., & Brown, W. (2007). Correlates of pedometer user: results from a community-based physical activity intervention trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4(31).Google Scholar
  5. Ertmer, P. A. (2006). Teacher pedagogical beliefs and classroom technology use: a critical link. Indiana: Purdue University.Google Scholar
  6. Keller, J. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maloy, R. W. (2011). Transforming learning with new technologies. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  8. Merriam-Webster (2015). Motivation definition. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/motivation.
  9. Ogilvie, D., Foster, C., Rothnie, H., Cavill, N., Hamilton, V., Fitzsimons, C., & Mutrie, N. (2007). Interventions to promote walking: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 334(1204).Google Scholar
  10. Reitzes, D. C., & Mutran. (2006). Self and health: factors that encourage self-esteem and functional health. Journal of Gerontology, 61B(1), S44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Risko, E., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Eyes wide shut: implied social presence, eye tracking and attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sharma, S., Gittelsohn, J., Rosol, R., & Beck, L. (2010). Addressing the public health burden caused by the nutrition transition through the healthy foods north nutrition and lifestyle intervention programme. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 23(Suppl 1), 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sheehan, K. B. (2001). Email survey response rates: a review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(0).Google Scholar
  14. Sheingold, K. & Hadley, M. (1990). Accomplished teachers: integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Centre for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  15. Stronge, J. H. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  16. Tomorrow, P. (2006). Speak Up 2006: Snapshot of Selected National Findings from Teachers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Watson College of EducationUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonWilmingtonUSA
  2. 2.Instructional Systems TechnologyUniversity of North Carolina CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations